- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 38,198
- Reaction score
- 15,841
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
The former is BS while the latter is Florida SYG law. There is no Florida statute that allows one to use "non-lethal" force against someone based on paranoid suspicion. WhatIf has been pushing that BS for days.
He's trying to use 776.012 to defend psychotic paranoia.
iLOL
I never said you had to obey. Did I?
And what is actually impotent, is your opinion, as it gets shown to be wrong, over and over and over again.
Duh!
You seem to be confused.Just a heads up.
Saying "Wrong!".
Doesn't prove squat.
Especially when its your opinion.
Your mind was made up before you got here.
Saying Zs statement is evidence and then demanding everybody else to accept it as gospel is as annoying as a Jehovahs Witness interrupting the game to tell you about the "Truth". And about as credible.
You seem to be confused.
That must be because you are wrong.
You don't seem to understand what evidence is and what it says.
When the evidence say 2+2=4, you don't jump in and say I think it equals 7 as you have been doing.
You stick to the evidence and what it tells you.
Sorry you don't understand that. It is one of the main reasons you have been wrong now for over a year on this subject.
I wonder ... If the guy on the right in this picture shot the kid on the left in this picture claiming self defense would the cops have let him go that night?
Well, while you are yawning ... how about honestly answering the question?*Yawn* Race Baiting in this debate is getting so old.....
Ask yourself this ... If the guy on the right in this picture shot the teen-ager on the left, in this picture, claiming self defense would the cops have let him go that night?
View attachment 67149788
Wrong! That is your assumption that he did.Your golden boy lied to the court about his finances.
Just a heads up.
Saying "Wrong!".
Doesn't prove squat.
Especially when its your opinion.
Your mind was made up before you got here.
Saying Zs statement is evidence and then demanding everybody else to accept it as gospel is as annoying as a Jehovahs Witness interrupting the game to tell you about the "Truth". And about as credible.
Well, while you are yawning ... how about honestly answering the question?
It's not insignificant .
Wrong
The state's *A-list witnesses* also corroborate Z's account
Wrong! That is your assumption that he did.
There is no evidence that it was a lie.
As far as you know, he was of the belief that the funds did not need to be reported.
You just do not know. But because of your blinding bias, you can't/wont see, or admit it.
No . What this picture does is the opposite of race baiting.Yes. It is insignificant.
It shows you have already drawn a conclusion, and that no amount of discussing the issue will change your mind.
You are race baiting, plain and simple.
Why not?
No . What this picture does is the opposite of race baiting.
This Photoshop exercise demonstrates all the assumptions we make when we identify someones ethnicity. By swapping the ethnic relationship it it shows how much the race of the primary players weighs in our perceptions of who they are and what they may or may not be capable of.
If you can look at this picture and if you can be honest, you can easily conclude that race has a good deal to do with whose side many people come down on in this case.
Many like to pretend that we are all color-blind. If we truly were, this picture would not upset anyone.
There is no corroboration of the beginning.
Only the word of someone who has proven they will decieve the court if it serves them.
I believe it was clear that I was speaking about your inability to see the the facts because of your blinding bias.Who is the one with the blinding bias again?
Everybody?
Your need to pretend color blindness demonstrates how blind to reality you also wish to be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?