Day 3 of One in, One out: 1072 in, 1 out

[Juin]

.


The Right Dishonourable Sir Keir Starmer's One in, One out policy appears to be a roaring success. It is far faster to cross the Chanel into England in a dinghy than to clear customs at Heathrow Airport. And the benefits do not end there. After clearing customs at Heathrow the dumb sucker still has to pay for his own Uber and hotel lodgings. The dinghy travel gets a free ride to a 5 Star Hotel, hotel expenses paid, and a daily stipend for cigarettes and scotch whiskey.

Today's invasion flotilla dwarfed the flotilla William the Conqueror set sail with to conquer Saxon England. It stood at 13 dinghies with 1072 on board. It was smooth sailing. Departure was smooth from France, there were no gendarmes to complicate departure.


Another thing. The Right Dishonourable Sir Keir Starmer's One in, One out deal appears to be a win win for France. Heads, France wins; tails, France wins. His Britannic Majesty gets the shaft whatever the outcome.

For example, assume the Dishonourable Keir Starmer manages to get today's 1072 VIP arrivals back to France; France gets to select and send back to England another 1072 VIPs! Supposedly the replacements are VIPs with more solid qualifications, like joining family members already VIPs in England. But today's dinghy VIPs can as equally have family members who are already guests of His Britannic Majesty. So, theoretically, a returnee can still qualify as a replacement. Either way France wins. A net of 1072 guests in France have been offloaded to England.

The whole thing is outrageous. A capital farce. A cruel joke on John Bull.

Methinks His Britannic Majesty is ill served by the Dishonourable Keir Starmer

More than 1,000 migrants arrive in small boats in one day - despite returns deal with France

The latest figures show 1,072 people made the journey in 13 boats - averaging more than 82 people per boat.

news.sky.com

 

[PeteEU]

And what is you suggestion? Sink the boats? Machine gun them down when they hit the beaches?

 

[Infinite Chaos]

And what is you suggestion? Sink the boats? Machine gun them down when they hit the beaches?

You've nailed the classic Reform position. Point out a problem but offer no solution.

 

[reinaert]

Brexit, yeah?

 

[Juin]

And what is you suggestion? Sink the boats? Machine gun them down when they hit the beaches?

If its an impossible task Keith Starmer should say so. Right now Lammy has been proclaiming how one in, one out is a first step; is that not misleading the public? It is a colossal failure. The Labour government should tell the citizens that immigration is something not within the powers of the United Kingdom to control

 

[Juin]

.


Another question I have not seen addressed anywhere? What stops an immigrant returned to France under one in, one out from heading back to England on the next dinghy? What does France do with those returned to France? Incarcerate them? Indefinitely? I think not. Does France forward the returnees back to their home countries? If that is the case, why does the UK not do so in the first place?

 

[Peter]

And what is you suggestion? Sink the boats? Machine gun them down when they hit the beaches?

Maybe build a giant wall all around the UK.
50 feet high should do the trick but I do admit it will rather spoil the beaches a bit though.

 

[Juin]

And what is you suggestion? Sink the boats? Machine gun them down when they hit the beaches?

Did Hungary have to machine gun anyone?

 

[bythoughts]

For example, assume the Dishonourable Keir Starmer manages to get today's 1072 VIP arrivals back to France; France gets to select and send back to England another 1072 VIPs! Supposedly the replacements are VIPs with more solid qualifications, like joining family members already VIPs in England. But today's dinghy VIPs can as equally have family members who are already guests of His Britannic Majesty. So, theoretically, a returnee can still qualify as a replacement. Either way France wins. A net of 1072 guests in France have been offloaded to England.

That was beautifully written. But the article you cited does say that people who are let in must not have attempted to enter illegally in the past. Are people really going to pay to get smuggled in a dinghy, just to make one extra place in that William-Conqueror-dwarfing International Migrant Army, knowing that they themselves will never be allowed in?

 

[PeteEU]

Did Hungary have to machine gun anyone?

What exactly are you talking about?

 

[PeteEU]

If its an impossible task Keith Starmer should say so. Right now Lammy has been proclaiming how one in, one out is a first step; is that not misleading the public? It is a colossal failure. The Labour government should tell the citizens that immigration is something not within the powers of the United Kingdom to control

Again.. immigration is easily controllable. The Tories did a piss poor job of it, and labour is finally bringing it down.

Refugees on the other hand is not controllable... unless the UK of course stops brownnosing the US in its many wars around the world, that cause the refugee problem in the first place.