:lol: He's doubling down. Trying to support his statement.
She wasn't talking about condoms, dude. :lamo Oh god you really don't know anything about this do you?
Are you even aware that birth control pills have medical uses other than contraception? Seeing as how you think she was talking about condoms, I suspect not.
Minneapolis-based Target is matching rival Wal-Mart in expanding a discount program that offers dozens of generic medications for $4 each - a change that includes selling a one-month supply of birth control pills for $9.
Who claimed she was specifically talking about condoms? I merely linked birth control that is inexpensive and effective. Nothing more. You're laughably grasping at straws.
You have yet to offer any credible argument why taxpayers are responsible for the slut Sandra Fluke's birth control
Oh and Target matches Wal-Mart drug cuts - TwinCities.com
It's laughably embarrassing that you're even defending that slut
I take it you aren't familiar with ovarian cysts. You know, one of the key points Fluke brought up in that transcript you linked but clearly didn't read? Keep digging, dude! Maybe you'll discover that there's more than one type of birth control pill.
Oh, another thing I should point out: taxpayers wouldn't be funding this. You see, there's these things called insurance premiums...
Even if birth control cured cancer that doesn't justify taxpayers subsidizing that slut's birth control
Try again
So much for the concept of free speech.
Libs declared him dead when he was found to be using oxycodone for one.
Nothing is free here, we are capitalists.
That's part of what this is all about. His crap has crossed the line too many times and he is toxic to too many advertisers.
But under a system of capitalism if you do not have the income to pay for commercial airwaves because you lost all your sponsors and listeners do not actually pay then.......Oh now i get it. Rush fans are socialists who think the government should fund rush and we all should pay to hear his speech. I never knew they were secret commies. better not let rush know because he might go along with it and become socialist and then we would be in a mighty paradox.
I explained how this isn't really relevant 5 months before Glenn Beck was taken off the air.
Hmm...3 days ago Benghazi gains momentum. 3 days ago Rush Limbaugh gets attacked over "ad revenue". Ya, that's a coincidence.
BTW, ad revenue always falls after an election as listeners fall. Here's the direct listener numbers: Rushlimbaugh.com Traffic and Demographic Statistics by Quantcast They fell after the 08 election and stabalized only slightly higher than they did after this election. If WABC/Cumulous isn't happy, they can find someone else with the same revenue draw.
Glen Beck is still on the air, 99.7FM KNZR here in Bakersfield, and has 7 million listeners according to Arbitron.
Who knows if they will actually get rid of Rush or not. beck was one thing, but rush is another. The problem most of the Rush supporters seem to not recognize is that if you lose advertisers listeners don't actually matter. It is a business and listeners are valuable as an audience that allows you to sell exposure through advertising revenue. If the advertisers are going away because you message is so disgusting that they won't buy time then it is time to move on.
there is also another problem with rush and the faux news demographic. Their audience is not the desired demographic. You can argue that rush and faux have an audience but they have a real problem coming around the bend in that their audience is much older, and they are alienating the younger audience who is also the big spending audience. It is not just the age demo either, but faux also tends to attract the lower educated poorer demographic which advertisers are probably well aware of.
It is just a matter of time before Rush leaves and pretends it is his choice to search out a venue on his own. I am sure he will get listeners wherever he goes. However, once he leaves his present umbrella his ratings will never recover, and his power will be gone.
All irrelevant. Advertisers and demographic groups tuning are what matters. Even then, demographic groups aren't all that important if nobody wants to be associated with your message. One advertiser jumps ship, it's not important. 40-50 advertisers jump ship and the rest start getting worried. At the end of his run Glenn Beck was running on gold and fertilizer companies. Quite a far cry from Progressive, Pepsi and McDonald's.
With 14 million listeners Rush aint gona have a problem getting advertisers, he just wont be able to charge quite as confiscatory rates as he does normally. The top 48 advertisers can advertise elsewhere and their slack will be taken up by others.
Not quite correct. Numbers is what attracts advertising, cost effectiveness is what keeps them. Rush will lose advertising from the majors but he will pick up lesser advertisers at a lesser rate. He aint going away not by a long shot. Especially with 14 million listeners in key demographics. His listeners help put Proflowers and the rest on the map. If his advertisers have a good service or product they will have a very good ROI advertising with Rush.
Literally nobody is suggesting that limbaugh doesn't have a right to do what he does. So have fun with your straw man.
I don't buy that. Advertisers promote their products with outlets by audience share. Rush has more than an adequate audience base. Anyone who says they will boycotts such advertisers is probably just full of hot air anyway.That's part of what this is all about. His crap has crossed the line too many times and he is toxic to too many advertisers.
The fact that you'd call her a slut indicates that you listen to Rush Limbaugh too much. What other opinions has he spoon fed you? :lamo
You don't have a constitutional right to advertising dollars, but I see you've retreated from the previous "free speech" argument.
If you don't buy something from MSNBCs advertisers, are you trying to silence MSNBC?
Hell, some of these companies advertise on all sorts of programs. I guess this means I'm trying to silence everyone at one! :lamo
You know, even if the major advertisers pull, Limbaugh will still be #1. The infrastructure around him would just be less profitable. People will lose jobs, but liberal/progressives will celebrate such job losses, out of spite.
Even if birth control cured cancer that doesn't justify taxpayers subsidizing that slut's birth control
Try again
Making vague comments about choice and what not implies censorship and similarly deflects the real issue which is America rejecting Rush and the bigger picture of America rejecting far right propaganda.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?