Giving Guantanamo back to the Castroit regime is something that cannot be done by executive order without a new law or approval by the Senate. That doesn't mean that Obama will try to do it.Cuba Expert: Obama Might Give Guantanamo to Russians
Obama Might Give Guantanamo to Russians, Cuba Expert Tells Newsmax TV
By Sean Piccoli
January 29 20125
President Barack Obama's eagerness to cut deals with Cuba at almost any costcould yield a "strategic disaster" in which the Russian military winds up controlling Guantanamo Bay, Cuba scholar Jaime Suchlicki told "MidPoint" host Ed Berliner on Newsmax TV Thursday.
The historic re-start of diplomatic and economic ties with Cuba ordered by Obama does not alter the fact that the communist nation's rulers neither want nor feel they need improved relations with the United States, said Suchlicki, director of the Cuban Institute at the University of Miami.
"Just look at all the demands issued by Cuban leader Raul Castro," said Suchlicki: a handover of Guantanamo Bay; embargo reparations to the tune of $2.5 trillion, and no U.S. "interference" in Cuban policies at home or abroad.
"If they were INTERESTED in helping the Cuban people they would've done a deal with the United States many years ago," said Suchlicki. "Neither [previous Cuban leader] Fidel [Castro] nor Raul are really interested in better relations with the United States."
"The Castros want concessions, not relations," he said, and Raul is "raising the bar so high that he's going to preclude any normalization."
How much Obama will indulge him should be a concern, said Suchlicki, alluding to a prisoner swap that freed Cuban spies — a deal that even Hillary Clinton said she opposed as Obama's Secretary of State.
On reparations, "Raul Castro is talking about $50 billion for the 50 years of the embargo," said Suchlicki, adding, "that's nonsense, and I don't think the U.S. will pay that."
But on another key demand, "giving away Guantanamo — this president is liable to do that," he said of Obama.
Castro, in turn, would "probably" turn the territory over to Russia as a naval base.
Pressed by Berliner on this scenario, with its overtones of the Cuban missile crisis, Suchlicki said, "I don't know what the president can get away with," meaning the political limits, if any, on Obama's willingness to placate Castro.
"My concern is that Guantanamo is one of the deepest bases in the Caribbean — ideal for submarines," he said. "And if Cuba were to turn that base [over] to the Russians, or tell the Russians that they can use that base, it would be a strategic disaster for the United States."
From Cuba's point of view, shunning the U.S. despite the overture from Obama after a half century of mutual hostility is not a tactical mistake, said Suchlicki.
"The point here is that [former Cuban leader] Fidel Castro is an ally of Venezuela, Iran, Russia and China," he said. "So for Cuba, the United States is not important. What is important is the [connection] with those countries that provide significant amounts of aid without any condition and without requesting anything."
Between the money Cuba brings in from tourism, remittances from Cubans working abroad and a thriving export market for Cuba's well-regarded medical professionals, the Castro brothers are convinced they can still CONTINUE on as they please, and maintain absolute political control, no matter what the U.S. says, said Suchlicki.
Click link above for rest of article.
Giving Guantanamo back to the Castroit regime is something that cannot be done by executive order without a new law or approval by the Senate. That doesn't mean that Obama will try to do it.
Obama problem now is that the checksand balances of Congress can work since the Legislative Branch is now control by the Republicans. He will go around Congress and use his Executive Order trying to go as far as he can.
In all seriousness, we should turn Cuba into a US territory for a while, and then into a state.Why in the world would anybody think of turning over Guantanamo to the Cubans? They are a hostile dictatorship, after all.
In all seriousness, we should turn Cuba into a US territory for a while, and then into a state.
In all seriousness, we should turn Cuba into a US territory for a while, and then into a state.
In all seriousness, that's not going to happen.
What are you smoking? :roll:
It's silly of me to expect the government to actually solve a problem, I know.In all seriousness, that's not going to happen.
What are you smoking? :roll:
Obama is determined not only to release the Islamic terrorists but to shut down Guantanamo base. Turning Guantanamo over to the Russian as a naval base by Castro II will be extremely dangerous for the US.The chance of the RUSSIANS taking over Gitmo is zero-point-zero.
We should have allowed it to become a Territory long ago. But think of Puerto Rico. We have not allowed them to enter the Union either.
In all seriousness, we should turn Cuba into a US territory for a while, and then into a state.
We hate them? News to me.Their refusal to let us own them is part of the reason we hate them so much.
We hate them? News to me.
Giving Guantanamo back to the Castroit regime is something that cannot be done by executive order without a new law or approval by the Senate. That doesn't mean that Obama will try to do it.
Obama problem now is that the checksand balances of Congress can work since the Legislative Branch is now control by the Republicans. He will go around Congress and use his Executive Order trying to go as far as he can.
It's silly of me to expect the government to actually solve a problem, I know.
I wouldn't be surprised if that pencil-necked Napoleon would try to bypass Congress to fulfill a campaign promise.
Who made a campaign promise to close the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base?
The promise was to close the prison, not the base.
The thread is giving the base back...so your post was off topic.
And we've always supported it? No.We still have an embargo against them. :lamo
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?