More black on black crime, but of course the problem is with the police.
BLM agenda should read Family, Education and Jobs is the way not criminal activity.
NYC woman, 74, punched in face after teens snatch purse, police say | Fox News
More black on black crime, but of course the problem is with the police.
BLM agenda should read Family, Education and Jobs is the way not criminal activity.
NYC woman, 74, punched in face after teens snatch purse, police say | Fox News
So because crime exists, we have to accept that there sre cops who are going to cross the line? That sounds like a pretty stupid binary choice you are making here.
Its like ignoring the leaking head gasket on your car because the transmission is skipping. Both things are problems and need to be fixed, and one is not inherently more important than the other.
More black on black crime, but of course the problem is with the police.
BLM agenda should read Family, Education and Jobs is the way not criminal activity.
NYC woman, 74, punched in face after teens snatch purse, police say | Fox News
I think we all acknowledge both. the question is emphasis. Eliminating cop abuse completely would be a drop on the bucket of the main issue. I am all for reforming cops. But the incredible lack of focus on the main issues means nothing much is going to change until that changes. And It’s politically driven. Dems will not touch the real problem and most gop will not either for fear of being labeled racist.let's not make it a binary choice:
either cultural inclination against authority and appropriate behavior
or
bad elements within the police departments
why not acknowledge it's some of both?
So your argument is that because we have a few bad cops, they are all bad and we should demonize the entire force. That makes sense.
Anyone who has been the victim of a violent crime (or who has a family member or friend who has been a victim) knows that the lesser of the two evils is the cop, not the violent, conscienceless individual that robbed or sucker punched or looted or raped or murdered.
Cops are no angels, but to whom do you turn to when you are a victim of the many, many, many bad individuals in this country?
And, in fact, the cops often do nothing to help you -- because you're not considered important enough or because they are afraid of being accused of being prejudiced against certain dear, sweet, perfectly innocent "children."
You ain't seen nothing yet! Wait until the 46th President is inaugurated in January. The police will be afraid to say even "Boo!" And the violent mobs will rule the streets.
I think we all acknowledge both. the question is emphasis. Eliminating cop abuse completely would be a drop on the bucket of the main issue. I am all for reforming cops. But the incredible lack of focus on the main issues means nothing much is going to change until that changes. And It’s politically driven. Dems will not touch the real problem and most gop will not either for fear of being labeled racist.
Not all cops are bad, but the bad ones need to be dealt with. You seem to be arguing against that notion, and I can't for the life of me figure out why.
Well I never said not to deal with it. But no reason we can’t do both and emphasis on the tougher problem.So lets not deal with the easier to deal with problem until the one that has been baked into society is dealt with, right?
Solving the problems in police departments is a way easier fix than solving the societal problems that exist in the black community. When the rubber meets the road, you could deal with the problems of the police forces inside of a couple years. You institute new policies and anyone who doesn't want to abide by them can find other employment. Simple. The same can't be said of the ills of the black community. That could take a generation to fix, maybe more.
But to imply that until we fix the generational problem we don't deal with the other is simply foolish and shortsighted. Its almost like people are okay with cops acting like assholes or something.
Who demonized the entire force? I surely didn't. If you think I did, please point me to where you think that happened.
The problem is the culture of the force, however. I don't think a good cop who says nothing is just as bad as a cop who crosses the line, but to say they aren't at least somewhat complicit would be inaccurate as well. The notion that not ratting out your partner is somehow more important than bringing a wrong to light has to change. The idea that you are a bad cop for telling the truth about the bad cops among you has to change as well.
This isn't one of those "if you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem" situations...because its not the job of one officer to be the keeper of another...but it would be fair to say if you aren't part of the solution, you aren't part of the solution...which is to say that if you are a good cop who sees a bad cop do something wrong, it IS incumbent upon you to say something, otherwise you kinda lose the high ground of claiming you do the right thing on the job. You aren't responsible for what the other guy did, but you are DAMN SURE responsible for your lack of action on the matter.
More black on black crime, but of course the problem is with the police.
BLM agenda should read Family, Education and Jobs is the way not criminal activity.
NYC woman, 74, punched in face after teens snatch purse, police say | Fox News
You don’t create a better police force by defunding the department. You need to train and vet the personnel but you will still get bad actors like any occupation.
And when you get those bad actors, standard procedure shouldnt be for the department to bend over backwards to protect those bad actors. Currently, that is exactly what happens.
You dont create a better police force by turning them into a military spec ops force either.
You can blame the democrat backed unions (except this year) for protecting these bad actors just like the democrat backed teachers union protect the bad teachers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?