- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 16,763
- Reaction score
- 4,344
- Location
- Melbourne Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
No you just went into how many cops you trained.Typical CON quibble, lose badly and pout the game was changed... No Sir, I showed where you made some very bad statements- trying to of all things claim until now it was OK for cops to shoot at vans full of kids, coz NOW the cops are strapped down by being denied that ability.... :roll:
Fact is I know the use of deadly force was NOT permitted and the Cop is wrong.
Really? And you have been or were an officer for how long?
No you just went into how many cops you trained.
Laughing, more CON quibble, you are sticking with what you don't know! Can't debate the facts so you try to throw some dust to hide your lack of fact.
Facts, you know those things I use. Not non-sense statements like 'clearly aiming', or 'more strapping', or the cop was canned because the citizens demanded it.
Cop broke the rules for the use of deadly force and was canned. Doesn't matter if he was 'clearly' aiming at the tires, the brake light or the radio antenna...
Sort of difficult to train cops or the civilian concealed crowd without knowing a bit about deadly force- something you seem to lack/deny.
Oh FYI, unlike a different self proclaimed expert on all things firearm related- I used the word 'helped' in front of trained. Just for a bit of accuracy in at least one of your statements and a whole lot more accuracy compared to the marksmanship skills of the now fighting for his job New Mexico cop. :2wave:
Nobody needs to have been a cop to see and understand what happened and who is at fault... the cop.
That is the standard non-argument argument. That only cops should decide on police policy and who cops get to shoot. He is rather open that his view is that police are our masters and should make and create whatever law any officer wants to at the moment. The concept that government employees including cops work for us, rather than they are our masters and we their peasants.
It would be like the bizarre claim that no one can credibly discuss rape or murder unless you've raped or murdered someone.
It also is probably lost to him that any person who has driven a carload of kids has just as much "experience" at this topic.
Mostly, police officers and the general public should be on the same page, rather than his it's us-cops vs them-people.
Van. Shot up. Pic? Where is it?
Fortunately he missed. I would think you had already read that.:roll:
So you think a 12 year veteran officer totally missed a van? From about 4 feet away?
Fortunately he missed. I would think you had already read that.:roll:
So you think a 12 year veteran officer totally missed a van? From about 4 feet away?
Again, how about we just disarm all PDs to suit your opinion of cops.From what I read, he completely missed. You read anything different from that? But I do understand your view that he was shooting for a tire, and I think you are right that was his goal. But he missed. If you miss a target the bullet doesn't just disappear. And he continued to fire as the vehicle rapidly pulled away too - not just at a few feet.
Again, how about we just disarm all PDs to suit your opinion of cops.
So you handed out pencils and got coffee. Got ya.
Again, how about we just disarm all PDs to suit your opinion of cops.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?