There is no excuse required, she assaulted an officer.
Yes, in the history of mankind it has been demonstrated that at no point can an adult male restrain a 10 year old girl without the use of weapons or tasers.
She was a little girl throwing a tantrum. That's it. Nothing you can say can distract from the facts. A grown man, a cop in fact, has no right tasering an unarmed little girl throwing a tantrum because her mother couldn't be bothered to parent properly.
The facts say otherwise, but you aren't interested in learning them.
You don't know what happened, your making a generalized assumption without the specific knowledge needed to make such an assumption in this particular case.
I'm glad people like you don't run use of force review boards, lacking the knowledge of what things are really like in the world of police work.
The facts? You mean the facts she was a 10 year old girl and some pathetic excuse of an officer couldnt restrain her?
Prove it.
:2wave:
Let's see....she was a little girl. Check. She was throwing a tantrum. Check.
The facts say otherwise, but you aren't interested in learning them.
Age has nothing to do with it, there is no age limit on self-defense statutes. And he restrained her quite nicely, thank you.
Were you there?
Do you know what she was doing?
No and No?
K, good game.. :mrgreen:
Well where morality and ethnical police practices stand, it has everything to do with age and strength. He could have shot her, that would have worked right? I mean, who cares that she was ten? :shrug:
Were you there?
Do you know what she was doing?
No and No?
K, good game.. :mrgreen:
Was she using lethal force?
No?
k, then your suggestion that he could have shot her is about as ignorant as all your posts in this thread.
You have proven you lack any knowledge on the subject to be more than just a troll.
kthnx.
She punched the officer in the balls what do you think she was doing, the salsa?
A 'tantrum' maybe over-simplifying what this girl was doing or trying to do.
I was not there, You were not there, Ikari was not there.
The officer and mother were there and they both agree that the use of the taser was appropriate. Who are we to make assumptions without having been there?
GG.
A 'tantrum' maybe over-simplifying what this girl was doing or trying to do.
I was not there, You were not there, Ikari was not there.
The officer and mother were there and they both agree that the use of the taser was appropriate. Who are we to make assumptions without having been there?
GG.
Considering that the mother called the cops on her 10 year old child because she was throwing a fit over bedtime, I'd say her ability to reason and give logical answers is in question.
If he said "this is your problem" and walked out, he'd be painted as ignoring the safety of the public...especially if the girl hurt herself or someone else after he left.
Considering the mother knows the child better than you, I'd say your ability to reason and give logical answers is in question.
Considering the mother knows the child better than you, I'd say your ability to reason and give logical answers is in question.
What does knowing the child have anything to do with it? A stranger tasered her at the end of the day. :shrug:
Im sorry, this would have been my response to the call after attempting to talk her down and getting no results.
I have little patience for parents who believed 911 is the phone-a-uniformed-parent hotline.
Yeah because the mother is obviously a reliable source of parenting, right?
And the idiot who tasered her, well lets not go there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?