• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Contraception Debate Delays Nomination of FDA Chief

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
13,941
Reaction score
8,399
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Source: Washigton Post


Is this abortion with a pill or are the democrats pulling whatever they can out of the air for a political agenda?
 
I think it's more about preventing the FDA from circumventing laws. As it stands now, abortion is legal in the US for the first trimester. The FDA has not given any scientific evidence that this pill isn't consumer ready. The FDA also has no business making ideological stance on drugs, that's what Congress is for.
 
vauge said:
Is this abortion with a pill or are the democrats pulling whatever they can out of the air for a political agenda?

I'm surprised at you Vauge... your question was neither fair, nor balanced :rwbelepha

It is called "Contraception" - against conception. Quite simple actually. It prevents the uterine wall from accepting the floating cell. This happens regularly under natural conditions when for a variety of reasons implantation is not in the best interest (physiologically or biochemically) of the host. What Plan B is an accepted and legal medical treatment.

For a reasonable person living in the 21st Century - Contraception is superior to facing an abortion and the ideologs in government need to stay out of everyones lives.
 
shuamort said:
The FDA also has no business making ideological stance on drugs, that's what Congress is for.

*Quivers* I honestly can't say that Congress has any right, at all to make an ideological stance on anything that involves a persons right to choose. At all. I would almost rather have the FDA do it as a lesser evil because at least they have to know something about the drug to be where they are. *Quivers again*
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…