• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Conservative's NYT op-ed says it all.

Mr Person

A Little Bitter
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
69,690
Reaction score
77,611
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I’m a registered Republican who just watched her party spend much of the summer pushing through new cuts to Medicaid. I’m also here to tell you why I’m an unlikely supporter of the program. My son’s life depends on government assistance. Recent cuts to Medicaid at both the federal and state levels mean millions of families like mine could soon be at a loss for how to care for our disabled loved ones.

In February 2021, during a routine ultrasound appointment when I was 17 weeks pregnant with my third child, David, doctors discovered that he had a set of life-threatening fetal anomalies. Our boy had an excruciatingly rare midline cleft lip and palate and was missing critical portions of his brain. We were told he fit the profile for a baby that had trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, or a disorder called holoprosencephaly, when the brain fails to divide appropriately into separate hemispheres. The first days after David’s diagnosis were otherworldly. Each subsequent day of my pregnancy was a nightmare. I became a person in pain.

Expecting David to be stillborn, we were amazed when he was born at term. {continues}


Sums it up nicely. She sees it. She's an "unlikely" supporter because she is a righty and righties oppose tax dollars helping people in need. But this time *SHE* and *HER SON* are the people in need. So now she's all for it.

Being a righty, she refuses to follow this where it leads: what about all the other programs that other people desperately need? Don't they count? No, of course not. They're not this particular "registered Republican conservative", so **** 'em.

That she's proud of. But don't take the Medicaid that she needs... that's different...

A truly aborrent ideology.




(Extra credit: and I bet if you got her talking about abortion and her son, she'd wax self-righteous about how she served God's will by refusing to abort a fetus that has now turned into a severely permanently damaged individual for whom "quality of life" will be a forever out of reach concept.

That's another thing that disgusts me with the bulk of the right. Basking in sanctimony for having inflicted needless suffering on another creature in the name of one's supposed "values", which somehow only ever apply to and bind others)
 
I’m a registered Republican who just watched her party spend much of the summer pushing through new cuts to Medicaid. I’m also here to tell you why I’m an unlikely supporter of the program. My son’s life depends on government assistance. Recent cuts to Medicaid at both the federal and state levels mean millions of families like mine could soon be at a loss for how to care for our disabled loved ones.

In February 2021, during a routine ultrasound appointment when I was 17 weeks pregnant with my third child, David, doctors discovered that he had a set of life-threatening fetal anomalies. Our boy had an excruciatingly rare midline cleft lip and palate and was missing critical portions of his brain. We were told he fit the profile for a baby that had trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, or a disorder called holoprosencephaly, when the brain fails to divide appropriately into separate hemispheres. The first days after David’s diagnosis were otherworldly. Each subsequent day of my pregnancy was a nightmare. I became a person in pain.

Expecting David to be stillborn, we were amazed when he was born at term. {continues}


Sums it up nicely. She sees it. She's an "unlikely" supporter because she is a righty and righties oppose tax dollars helping people in need. But this time *SHE* and *HER SON* are the people in need. So now she's all for it.

Being a righty, she refuses to follow this where it leads: what about all the other programs that other people desperately need? Don't they count? No, of course not. They're not this particular "registered Republican conservative", so **** 'em.

That she's proud of. But don't take the Medicaid that she needs... that's different...

A truly aborrent ideology.




(Extra credit: and I bet if you got her talking about abortion and her son, she'd wax self-righteous about how she served God's will by refusing to abort a fetus that has now turned into a severely permanently damaged individual for whom "quality of life" will be a forever out of reach concept.

That's another thing that disgusts me with the bulk of the right. Basking in sanctimony for having inflicted needless suffering on another creature in the name of one's supposed "values", which somehow only ever apply to and bind others)

Because conservatism is a form of sociopathy. They don’t care about other people until they are personally affected in some way.

“**** you, I’ve got mine” as an ideology.
 
I’m a registered Republican who just watched her party spend much of the summer pushing through new cuts to Medicaid. I’m also here to tell you why I’m an unlikely supporter of the program. My son’s life depends on government assistance. Recent cuts to Medicaid at both the federal and state levels mean millions of families like mine could soon be at a loss for how to care for our disabled loved ones.

In February 2021, during a routine ultrasound appointment when I was 17 weeks pregnant with my third child, David, doctors discovered that he had a set of life-threatening fetal anomalies. Our boy had an excruciatingly rare midline cleft lip and palate and was missing critical portions of his brain. We were told he fit the profile for a baby that had trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, or a disorder called holoprosencephaly, when the brain fails to divide appropriately into separate hemispheres. The first days after David’s diagnosis were otherworldly. Each subsequent day of my pregnancy was a nightmare. I became a person in pain.

Expecting David to be stillborn, we were amazed when he was born at term. {continues}


Sums it up nicely. She sees it. She's an "unlikely" supporter because she is a righty and righties oppose tax dollars helping people in need. But this time *SHE* and *HER SON* are the people in need. So now she's all for it.

Being a righty, she refuses to follow this where it leads: what about all the other programs that other people desperately need? Don't they count? No, of course not. They're not this particular "registered Republican conservative", so **** 'em.

That she's proud of. But don't take the Medicaid that she needs... that's different...

A truly aborrent ideology.




(Extra credit: and I bet if you got her talking about abortion and her son, she'd wax self-righteous about how she served God's will by refusing to abort a fetus that has now turned into a severely permanently damaged individual for whom "quality of life" will be a forever out of reach concept.

That's another thing that disgusts me with the bulk of the right. Basking in sanctimony for having inflicted needless suffering on another creature in the name of one's supposed "values", which somehow only ever apply to and bind others)
They only care when it affects them directly. She voted for Trump and by doing so gave her silent agreement to accept whatever trump did to others, never stopping to think his decisions could directly hurt her. They just can't see past the hatred their leadership has taught them about the left for decade after decade. Remember reagan's welfare queens?
 
They only care when it affects them directly. She voted for Trump and by doing so gave her silent agreement to accept whatever trump did to others, never stopping to think his decisions could directly hurt her. They just can't see past the hatred their leadership has taught them about the left for decade after decade. Remember reagan's welfare queens?

“I can’t believe the Leopards would eat *my* face?!?”, says woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party.
 
This is true for climate change as well. They figure if it’s going to hurt, it’s going to be those OTHER people living in poorer parts of the world, or at worst maybe their own children and grandchildren.

So who cares, right?
 
This is true for climate change as well. They figure if it’s going to hurt, it’s going to be those OTHER people living in poorer parts of the world, or at worst maybe their own children and grandchildren.

So who cares, right?

“What do you mean my beach house in the Hamptons is at risk of flooding?!?”
 
I have zero pity for folks like her who were willing to inflict this on others.
The problem is you cannot isolate the voters from their own family. I have a lot of pity for the disabled son, in whatever state he happens to reside. MAGA voters in Louisiana, Alabama, Florida have elderly parents, children and disabled loved ones who are dependent on those miserable selfish pieces of rural and small town garbage.
 
I’m a registered Republican who just watched her party spend much of the summer pushing through new cuts to Medicaid. I’m also here to tell you why I’m an unlikely supporter of the program. My son’s life depends on government assistance. Recent cuts to Medicaid at both the federal and state levels mean millions of families like mine could soon be at a loss for how to care for our disabled loved ones.

In February 2021, during a routine ultrasound appointment when I was 17 weeks pregnant with my third child, David, doctors discovered that he had a set of life-threatening fetal anomalies. Our boy had an excruciatingly rare midline cleft lip and palate and was missing critical portions of his brain. We were told he fit the profile for a baby that had trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, or a disorder called holoprosencephaly, when the brain fails to divide appropriately into separate hemispheres. The first days after David’s diagnosis were otherworldly. Each subsequent day of my pregnancy was a nightmare. I became a person in pain.

Expecting David to be stillborn, we were amazed when he was born at term. {continues}


Sums it up nicely. She sees it. She's an "unlikely" supporter because she is a righty and righties oppose tax dollars helping people in need. But this time *SHE* and *HER SON* are the people in need. So now she's all for it.

Being a righty, she refuses to follow this where it leads: what about all the other programs that other people desperately need? Don't they count? No, of course not. They're not this particular "registered Republican conservative", so **** 'em.

That she's proud of. But don't take the Medicaid that she needs... that's different...

A truly aborrent ideology.




(Extra credit: and I bet if you got her talking about abortion and her son, she'd wax self-righteous about how she served God's will by refusing to abort a fetus that has now turned into a severely permanently damaged individual for whom "quality of life" will be a forever out of reach concept.

That's another thing that disgusts me with the bulk of the right. Basking in sanctimony for having inflicted needless suffering on another creature in the name of one's supposed "values", which somehow only ever apply to and bind others)
We are still going to be spending nearly $1 trillion per year on Medicaid. Panicrats are pretending the program is being discontinued. its not
 
“I can’t believe the Leopards would eat *my* face?!?”, says woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party.
Which to this day I don't understand. Your family relies on government programs; a candidate promises to gut those programs, thereby threatening your family's wellbeing; you vote for them anyway, thinking what -"Well, he probably won't do it/He won't cut the programs MY family depends on/But someone has to do something about wokeism?"
 
We are still going to be spending nearly $1 trillion per year on Medicaid. Panicrats are pretending the program is being discontinued. its not
Every tax dollar spent is sacred. Reducing spending by even a single dollar means billions of people will die.
 
We are still going to be spending nearly $1 trillion per year on Medicaid. Panicrats are pretending the program is being discontinued. its not

Pretending Trump hasn’t cut Medicaid access and programs Is dishonest as all hell.

We spend that much because we have to deliver profits to healthcare industry shareholders.
 
Which to this day I don't understand. Your family relies on government programs; a candidate promises to gut those programs, thereby threatening your family's wellbeing; you vote for them anyway, thinking what -"Well, he probably won't do it/He won't cut the programs MY family depends on/But someone has to do something about wokeism?"

“Cutting Medicaid and other government programs is in Project 2025.”

“But Trump said he hasn’t even heard of Project 2025!”
 
Just like with military spending. ANY REDUCTION MEANS WE WON'T BE ABLE TO DEFEND OURSELVES.
I’ve said here before that a good start to reducing spending would be to cut everything back by 10-15%, including the military spending. There are no sacred cows for me in the federal budget.
 
Every tax dollar spent is sacred. Reducing spending by even a single dollar means billions of people will die.

If we cut even a single dollar from police budgets, we will have criminals overrunning the country.
 
Pretending Trump hasn’t cut Medicaid access and programs Is dishonest as all hell.

We spend that much because we have to deliver profits to healthcare industry shareholders.
The woman in the OP has NOT lost her coverage. And spending a trillion every year on Medicaid means that 10s of millions will NOT lose their coverage at all. But why do you support the idea that people who should not be on Medicare continue to get coverage and the woman in the OP not?
 
The woman in the OP has NOT lost her coverage. And spending a trillion every year on Medicaid means that 10s of millions will NOT lose their coverage at all. But why do you support the idea that people who should not be on Medicare continue to get coverage and the woman in the OP not?

Like who? You realize the form of Medicare/medicaid fraud you are talking about is almost non-existent right?

The vast vast majority of fraud comes from capitalist pro-profit healthcare providers.
 
The woman in the OP has NOT lost her coverage. And spending a trillion every year on Medicaid means that 10s of millions will NOT lose their coverage at all. But why do you support the idea that people who should not be on Medicare continue to get coverage and the woman in the OP not?
The actual point is going right over some people's head, ain't it?
 
Back
Top Bottom