- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,813
- Reaction score
- 2,233
- Location
- Huntsville, AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
When I review my words I made no assumption that he is a Muslim extremist. But we both agree that he did attend a Madrassa in Indonesia in his early youth. He is reported to have said that the Muslim call to prayer is the sweetest sound. Does that make him a Muslim extremist? Only if it makes all Muslims extremists.no, we don't agree...as you're trying to make the very dishonest & pathetic insinuation that Obama is a Muslim extremist, like Al Qaeda.
No it wasn't. Media Matters is partisan and unreliable. Not that Fox is better.I'm not arguing the point to be placated, but to demonstrate the fallacy of your claim -- which was successfully accomplished several posts ago.
No it wasn't. Media Matters is partisan and unreliable. Not that Fox is better.
You haven't shown a G-D thing MrV. The link I provided was to a video and there was nothing to read. What Media Matters does is to document what said, they do this with video, audio and very often with transcripts.I have shown where they are wrong. Why should I play our game? You're "target Audience" for that site... of course you think they have good info. It appeals to what you want to read.
Sorry, but partisan does not equate to unreliable. You can be partisan but still tell the truth, Fox can't do that. I don't think many people care that much that they are conservative outlet, it the truth that they worry about.No it wasn't. Media Matters is partisan and unreliable. Not that Fox is better.
Which has zero to do with the accuracy of their reporting. But we already know that you refuse to judge them on their content, so why keep on posting your childishly illogical argument for all to laugh at? Logic that is equally fallacious to the conservative tactic of criticizing Obama simply because of the color of his skin, his parents, or the schools he attended as a child.We've all been to Media Matters, read their "facts", did our own research into "Who are these people, what are they doing this for and why" [...]
That's because the right wing definition of a madrassa is a terrorist training school -- which I have already clearly proven, making your repeated attempt to beat that dead propaganda horse, again, simply dumbfounding. I can only conclude that, in your version of reality, the world actually is flat.[...] His apologists will claim that a Muslim run schools is not a Madrassa [...]
When I review my words I made no assumption that he is a Muslim extremist. But we both agree that he did attend a Madrassa in Indonesia in his early youth. He is reported to have said that the Muslim call to prayer is the sweetest sound. Does that make him a Muslim extremist? Only if it makes all Muslims extremists.
LOL... you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Since your opinion has been challenged, and you have refused to substantiate it (by providing examples of Media Matters unreliability), you are now simply spouting propaganda... making your opinion, and your posts, partisan and unreliable.No it wasn't. Media Matters is partisan and unreliable. [...]
That's because the right wing definition of a madrassa is a terrorist training school -- which I have already clearly proven, making your repeated attempt to beat that dead propaganda horse, again, simply dumbfounding. I can only conclude that, in your version of reality, the world actually is flat.
Amazing.
Which has zero to do with the accuracy of their reporting. But we already know that you refuse to judge them on their content, so why keep on posting your childishly illogical argument for all to laugh at? Logic that is equally fallacious to the conservative tactic of criticizing Obama simply because of the color of his skin, his parents, or the schools he attended as a child.
Were you the one that posted "facts are not as important as the message"? :shock: (as I refer to post #179, I see that you indeed are).
Now I realize that the faulty ad hominem, guilt-by-association logic you have been utilizing in this thread is routinely employed in right wing talk media (where I assume that some copy/parrot it), but am at a loss as to why conservatives on message boards such as this don't understand that is the very reason so many intelligent people laugh at it.
Your argument consists of, if Fox News says the world is flat, and Media Matters attacks Fox News for saying that the world is flat (and provides evidence or rational argument that the world is, indeed, round), then -- according to your logic, that Media Matters cannot be trusted due to their funding or whatever -- the world is, indeed, flat. I wish you many successful debates with that logic
The word 'and' is a wonderful word. It is a conjunctive word, it allows you to tie to words together without having to say that one must follow the other.Sorry, but partisan does not equate to unreliable. You can be partisan but still tell the truth, Fox can't do that. I don't think many people care that much that they are conservative outlet, it the truth that they worry about.
Madrassa is 'right wing' for 'terrorist'. While I would presume you are already aware of that (and question the intellectual honesty of your post on that unproven basis alone), the more important observation is why haven't you been keeping up?[...] Madrassa is Arabic for school. It is frequently a school linked to a mosque. [...]
In his "My Word" segment, [former Fox News host John] Gibson said: "Americans have a visceral reaction to the word 'madrassa.' In our world, a madrassa's where zealots train your Muslim kids to hate America, to hate the West, and to be killers. Saying Obama attended a madrassa is tying Obama's name to terrorism, and that is real political hardball in action, especially when Obama himself said in his own book that he attended a predominantly Muslim school as a youngster in Indonesia."
Fox defense of Gibson's report on Obama smear missed mark | Media Matters for America | January 29, 2007
Your posts are quite boring aren't they.LOL... you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Since your opinion has been challenged, and you have refused to substantiate it (by providing examples of Media Matters unreliability), you are now simply spouting propaganda... making your opinion, and your posts, partisan and unreliable.
Imagine that.
Madrasah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Madrassa or Madrasa - What Is a Madrassa
Madrassa - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Madrassa - definition of Madrassa by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Madrassa: Definition with Madrassa Pictures and Photos
Madrassa is Arabic for school. It is frequently a school linked to a mosque.
Your conclusion? Its a strawman. Not to mention your constant attempt to tag it onto people that disagree with you is a pathetic way to debate.
How do you see conservatives?
Some people are kooks. To the degree it is possible I am done with you.That's because the right wing definition of a madrassa is a terrorist training school -- which I have already clearly proven, making your repeated attempt to beat that dead propaganda horse, again, simply dumbfounding. I can only conclude that, in your version of reality, the world actually is flat.
Amazing.
I have listened twice. To be as polite as possible, I disagree.The call to prayer is magnificent to listen to. I'd question your hearing ability if you denied it. That's from the fingers of a bad Catholic who also enjoys gregorian chants.
I dunno... you seem to be quite infatuated by themYour posts are quite boring aren't they.
Is there something 'non-factual' or erroneous in that link (above)?Though I must say I can understand how you would think they were some prestige Media Think Tank with such stellar reporting as this;
Rachel Maddow Discusses Fox's History Of Fabricating Stories And FOXLEAKS | Media Matters for America
An article reporting on the disuse of a dehumanizing term is stupid?And how courageous of them to hold Fox accountable for using the term illegals, for illegal immigrants. That isn't a bloody stupid article at all;
NY Times Drops "Illegals," As Fox Continues To Cling To Slur | Media Matters for America
Criticizing a Fox reporter for lying somehow upsets you? Why?Or how about this, they made sure the reporter didn't get away with claiming the employment rate only went down in Ohio and a few other states, except of course a lot of the decline was people who stopped looking for work;
Fox's Hemmer Falsely Claims Only A "Few States" Have Seen Unemployment Drop | Media Matters for America
Really? I found it to be a compilation of right wing falsehoods:This is just a campaign piece for Obama;
2011: The Bush Economy Gets A Makeover | Media Matters for America
"In August, Limbaugh claimed that Obama inherited "an unemployment rate of 5.7 percent." A few days later, Hannity claimed Obama inherited an unemployment rate of 5.6 percent. Fox's Brian Kilmeade hearkened back to a time when things were "a lot better" under Bush, when unemployment was 5 percent. All of these figures are "flat out lies." Obama inherited an unemployment rate of 7.8 percent. "
:lamoAll it is is the same tired partisan stuff you get on Fox. No more neutral, no more truthful.
.....but yes, by saying Obama went to a Midrassah, anti-Islamic bigots are trying to associate Obama with Islamic-extremism, for many Westerners connect Midrassahs with extremist schools in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, etc.
I agree with your former statement. As to the latter, does this mean we won't be exchanging Christmas cards next year?Some people are kooks. To the degree it is possible I am done with you.
I love the comments on being "open minded." Someone who is close minded is someone who won't agree with your point of view.
Completely disagree with this. I'm liberal all the way, and my liberal parents and liberal neighbors were some of the most closed minded people I've ever met.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?