- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 104,071
- Reaction score
- 84,041
- Location
- Biden's 'Murica
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Greetings, tres borrachos. :2wave:
:thumbs: I wonder why that is? :mrgreen:
This is not a problem for Repubs in the slightest.
Electoral wise, not yet. Though with the dynamic that's rising, it could become a bit costly in the mid-term (say, the next decade). Most people are self-interested, but they tend to align with parties that at least appear to be where de facto public dialogue is.
Repubs will adjust appropriately.
Which will require rethinking these kind of events.
Not for the Repubs. They're not involved in this event.
The candidates and advisement from the RNC would be most assuredly affected.
Candidates are candidates. They are not the party.
The candidates and advisement from the RNC would be most assuredly affected.
The candidates are the public profile for the Party and once selected are essentially heir apparent for the Party. The RNC knows this well, which is why they had tried 3 years ago to dramatically alter their image and informational infrastructure, in hopes that it would reverberate throughout the entire Party and their future candidates.
They are, in effect, the Party.
An event as described here is a pre-nomination affair, and not a party event. Candidates go where the votes are; there's nothing to talk about.
It's all connected even though the particulars are not. The national committee has a vested interest in promoting a platform that resonates, finding candidates that fit that profile, and being able to control the public image of its party and its candidates, wherever they are. It's a pr issue even though the event is private.
boasting about ones credential on an anonymous internet forum is only worth the as much as a failed argument.
Right, because the freedom of some and their pursuit of happiness should be subject to mob rule.
It was not a Republican event.
Are you saying that the GOP isn't sponsoring it? That is correct. However, have you seen the list of speakers and invited speakers (those who have not yet confirmed)? :roll: It's Republican, Jack.
If it walks like a duck.
And yet, not a Repub event.
Semantics win. These people are clearly a cross section of political persuasions who are only interested in the far right Republican agenda.
[h=3]New Poll Shows Evangelicals Vote Democrat Too | Religion ...[/h]religiondispatches.org/new-poll-shows-evangelicals-v...
Religion Dispatches
Apr 16, 2009 -...Contrary to the conventional wisdom that the GOP has a lock on white evangelical voters, 1 in 3 evangelicals voted in the Democratic primary,
This isn't a Republican event.
No, not remarkable at all that there is a Log Cabin group in Colorado. The Log Cabins have been around since the 1970s.
That only left 2/3rds to vote for the GOP, eh?
:lamo
Organizers of a conservative conference in Denver this summer have told a gay Republican group it cannot have a booth at the event.
Read the article here: Conservative Group Bars Log Cabin Republicans From Event - US News
What happened to the GOP's big tent? Any ideas on that?
Duh...um...uh the left likes gays, and...um..we..ummm are the other one...um so we don't like...um what they...um...like.
After the GOP gets its butt handed to it next year maybe you can come back and tell us why you think that happened.
I don't think you are following the context.
What scenario? What are you talking about. The op was about something that already occurred in Colorado. no scenario is relevant.Believe whatever you want to believe, but don't be surprised when things don't follow your scenario.
So?Very few of the people who are hated, feared and despised by the GOP will be voting for the GOP next year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?