• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Congressional Hearing On Missel Attack ON UFO With Video

rhinefire said:
BTW why on earth would anyone bother with us?
We are less than a dot within our own solar system. Our solar system is effectively non existent in relationship to the KNOW universe.
So you have the answer to the universe. Too bad Stephan Hawking passed away he would have loved to speak woth you. Give Michio Kaku and Neil deGrasse Tyson a call to let them know what you know.
Click to expand...
I have.

Hawking and I agreed that it best not to send out signals advising other worlds of our existence
Do you know why?


Idiots think it wise and we have.

You recall when Hawking claimed information was lost on the event horizon?
I immediately took issue and eventually after the Susskind war he admitted his mistake.

I know how to think
I see no other posts following suit.
 
Napoleon said:
Use of the Hellfire R9X is so classified that the military doesn’t even acknowledge using it - which is most likely why this video was classified. There have only been a handful of strikes tentatively identified by analysts as having involved the R9X and all of them were against stationary armored vehicles. It doesn’t have any public record of success in intercepting anything airborne, but as we can see in the video it’s not great.

There are several things we can tell from the video. One is that the object and the missile are similar in size. What you’re looking at in that video isn’t some massive object. The R9X has a length of 64 inches, a diameter of 7 inches, and a wingspan of 13 inches. So unless you’re going to spin some woo-woo story that we’re being invaded by micro aliens that are only a few inches tall, I don’t want to hear about aliens.

Dimensions like that do fit the drones used by Houthis and what the military was shooting at in the area when this video was taken.
Click to expand...
So, your hands-on knowledge on intelligent life else ware originates from where, Star Wars? Was Voyager I and II manned? Is their mission to seek out and invade and kidnap inhabitants to return them to Earth?
 
noonereal said:
I have.

Hawking and I agreed that it best not to send out signals advising other worlds of our existence
Do you know why?


Idiots think it wise and we have.

You recall when Hawking claimed information was lost on the event horizon?
I immediately took issue and eventually after the Susskind war he admitted his mistake.

I know how to think
I see no other posts following suit.
Click to expand...
So you admit there is the chance life exists elsewhere thinking they might pick up broadcast signals of I Love Lucy or God forbid radio broadcasts of Gangbusters. Hawkings said "ignorance of nature's ways led people in ancient times to invent gods to lord it over every aspect of life." The same holds true about life elsewhere. He also said, "there is no single theory that is ago representation of observations in all situations." Yet some people need to be kicked in the groin in order to get their attention. I won't go into M-Theory. So, my question is why do some here in this thread and elsewhere on our planet believe this OP is BS when they know nothing outside of the living room walls.
 
rhinefire said:
So, my question is why do some here in this thread and elsewhere on our planet believe this OP is BS when they know nothing outside of the living room walls
Click to expand...

Because it offer no proof of anything.

Do you not understand this?


A wise man requires evidence that is verifiable.

None is presented here. Speculation is not proof.

How can you not understand?

Speculation is not proof.
 
U.S. Air Force veteran Jeffrey Nuccetelli and U.S. Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer Alexandro Wiggins testified that no U.S. technology is capable of surviving such a strike.
When asked if the video frightened them, Nuccetelli, Wiggins, and U.S. Air Force veteran Dylan Borland said, "yes."
 
noonereal said:
Because it offer no proof of anything.

Do you not understand this?


A wise man requires evidence that is verifiable.

None is presented here. Speculation is not proof.

How can you not understand?

Speculation is not proof.
Click to expand...
You are lost. No one is claiming anything not even speculating. The claim is simply something happened that defies explanation. All those that claim this is bogus must learn our laws of physics do not apply throughout the universe. Your statement about a wiseman is disconnected. This is NOT speculation rather investigating. Know the difference. The video proves something happened, nothing more. If we don't know what the object is, we can't say a damn thing about its physical properties much less it's place of origin. We do know if a hellfire missel strikes some flying it usually results in the object falling but not necessarily crashing. The video shows nothing of that sort therefore the investigation. A closed mind is not a mind at all.
 
Chock Full o Nuts said:
Saw yesterday, and surely odd. What could make the missle deflect and not detonate? And what are the three smaller objects that appear trailing the object after the interaction?

If it's Russian or Chinese tech, we're ******!:oops:

But I'm sure the whole thing will remain🤷‍♂️ like it always does. Someone knows something; and if they don't best figure that shit out.
Click to expand...
Maybe it's just me, but it looked like a balloon IMO. A balloon would be unlikely to trigger a missile detonation but would register as a lost target, and the three smaller objects looked like paper or cloth tatters. Plus, the movement of larger object after it was struck by the missile looked like a popped balloon falling out of frame to me. And the apparent high speed of the object could be explained by motion parallax. A camera moving at high speed at altitude focused on a stationary or slow-moving object below but still at high altitude would make the ground or water move quickly in the frame and create the illusion of the object moving high speed, when in reality it is the camera moving at high speed, not the object.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom