No, He also skims OTHER junkscience conspiracy blogs for silly cartoon memes and dishonest out-of-context quote mines that he can mindlessy parrot. Not just WUWT.But it's a news article about media coverage, not a scientific study about climate change.
Are you denying that you base your opinion about global warming mostly on what you read in WattsUp?
Covering Climate Now signs on over 170 news outlets - Columbia Journalism Review
So we're looking at an obvious agenda here- to brainwash the uninformed public based on an unproven hypothesis and hyperbolic apocalyptic predictions that the world is somehow going to end if the average temperature goes up by less than 2 degrees. And of course the lemmings are going to lap this up.
Perhaps he has a need to believe he is “smart” and can “think for himself”- by mindlessly swallowing and regurgitating the same old scientifically illiterate crap and conspiracy rubbish from junkscience conspiracy blogs that every other Climate Truther sheep does.Oh FFS; words cannot express how disappointed I am with your utter disregard of decades of scientific research. WTF, do you have a self-published book about how humans affecting climate change are basically destroying the planet is some kind of partisan myth? I see no other reason why an intelligent individual who has survived decades with increasingly polluted oceans and drinking water, along with the massive destruction of global ice, rising sea levels, extinction of thousands of land and sea creatures, and the imminent inundation of thousands of miles of coastal land mass around the globe could possibly pretend that "there's nothing to see here, move along."
Humans are destroying this planet. If you don't care, for whatever reason, your grandchildren's and great-grandchildren's generation certainly will care, because they very well may represent that last generation of human beings on what will eventually be a completely dead planet. What on god's green earth do you personally get out of this utterly indefensible propaganda platitude? The mind boggles. Do you believe that as long as you get what you want during your lifetime that the lives of those who come after you no longer matter, because you won't be around to care? I just can't wrap my mind around something so selfish and narcissistic.
Yes all the links you post are bull****. Its pretty sad if you don’t know the difference between evidence-based science reports and The Onion. And very dishonest if you do.
They’ve already been plenty of crap books written by science deniers making dishonest scientifically illiterate conspiracy claims. Its the same crap found on the junkscience conspiracy blogs you love. Don’t you already have enough bed time reading?A good book needs to be written that covers all the reasons why there is skepticism about the claims made concerning Climate Change. Predictions that haven’t come true, scenarios that don’t make sense, re- written historical data, silencing of opposing viewpoints, and obvious propaganda.
Climate Truther tactic #1 - Create lame dishonest strawmen arguments to attack.Please don't make me think you're really that stupid.
Climate Truther tactic #2- Dishonestly misrepresent an articleCovering Climate Now signs on over 170 news outlets - Columbia Journalism Review
So we're looking at an obvious agenda here- to brainwash the uninformed public based on an unproven hypothesis and hyperbolic apocalyptic predictions that the world is somehow going to end if the average temperature goes up by less than 2 degrees. And of course the lemmings are going to lap this up.
Climate Truther tactic #3 - Projecting their own behaviour/characteristics on to others.Youre basically arguing with a bunch of fanatics who will not listen to reason. Their minds are set (even though they have no idea what it is theyre supposed to believe in) and nothing will sway them, just like Al Qeda.
First off, no one is misleading anyone! There is a large defined range expected ECS from doubling the CO2 level,What's the incentive of scientists to mislead the public about climate change? What would they have to gain?
Climate Truther tactic #3 - Projecting their own behaviour/characteristics on to others.
Climate Truther tactic #4 - making delusional claims that have no basis in realty to try to save face.LMAO 3 straight replies one minute after the other and composed of nothing but childish insults. Thanks for proving my point. :lamo
Looks like a taser event to me!Stupid is as stupid does.
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/23/here-are-the-scenes-from-dcs-climate-protest/"][/URL][/FONT]
[h=1]Here Are The Scenes From DC’s Climate Protest[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]From The Daily Caller Shelby Talcott Reporter September 23, 2019 10:55 AM ET Climate change activists protested on the streets of Washington, D.C., Monday, aiming to shut down the city in an effort to push the government to take action on the climate crisis. Activists blocked key intersections throughout the nation’s capital Monday morning, causing…[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/23/here-are-the-scenes-from-dcs-climate-protest/"]Continue reading →[/URL][/FONT]
[/FONT]
Looks like a taser event to me!
Um, nope.
Highest ever temp recorded was in Death Valley... in 1913. That hasnt been broken.
Highest temperature recorded on Earth - Wikipedia
Major hurricanes are... less frequent:
Don't Believe The Global Warmists, Major Hurricanes Are Less Frequent
So.... it seems you are being lied to since facts are facts. Lemmings get led, while intelligent people look at the facts before passing judgment. Which one are you?
Tens of thousands of scientists that have devoted their career to studying this: "Global hurricane intensity and quantity, as well a precipitation from these storms will rise with climate change."
Conspiracy Theorist Rebuttal: "Well here's a 7 year old opinion article from a magazine about investing showing that you're wrong!"
Seriously?
| Figure: Global Hurricane Frequency (all & major) -- 12-month running sums. The top time series is the number of global tropical cyclones that reached at least hurricane-force (maximum lifetime wind speed exceeds 64-knots). The bottom time series is the number of global tropical cyclones that reached major hurricane strength (96-knots+). Adapted from Maue (2011) GRL. |
|---|
Actually, the rebuttal is the data.
Figure: Global Hurricane Frequency (all & major) -- 12-month running sums. The top time series is the number of global tropical cyclones that reached at least hurricane-force (maximum lifetime wind speed exceeds 64-knots). The bottom time series is the number of global tropical cyclones that reached major hurricane strength (96-knots+). Adapted from Maue (2011) GRL.
Tens of thousands of scientists that have devoted their career to studying this: "Global hurricane intensity and quantity, as well a precipitation from these storms will rise with climate change."
Conspiracy Theorist Rebuttal: "Well here's a 7 year old opinion article from a magazine about investing showing that you're wrong!"
Seriously?
So you didn't post a 7 year old opinion article in your response?
Covering Climate Now signs on over 170 news outlets - Columbia Journalism Review
So we're looking at an obvious agenda here- to brainwash the uninformed public based on an unproven hypothesis and hyperbolic apocalyptic predictions that the world is somehow going to end if the average temperature goes up by less than 2 degrees. And of course the lemmings are going to lap this up.
Covering Climate Now signs on over 170 news outlets - Columbia Journalism Review
So we're looking at an obvious agenda here- to brainwash the uninformed public based on an unproven hypothesis and hyperbolic apocalyptic predictions that the world is somehow going to end if the average temperature goes up by less than 2 degrees. And of course the lemmings are going to lap this up.
Actually no. The science is solid. It's called educating the public. That's their job.
LMAO 3 straight replies one minute after the other and composed of nothing but childish insults. Thanks for proving my point. :lamo
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?