• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Confirmed: Mainstream Media Outlets Working Together To Set Climate Agenda

Steve Case said:
A good book needs to be written that covers all the reasons why there is skepticism about the claims made concerning Climate Change. Predictions that haven’t come true, scenarios that don’t make sense, re- written historical data, silencing of opposing viewpoints, and obvious propaganda.
Click to expand...

True, true. That's why the media should cover the "truth" about Area 51, and 9/11, and the flat earth, and Pizzagate, and QAnon...

Hell, they should go for broke and give this guy coverage:

 
Phys251 said:
True, true. That's why the media should cover the "truth" about Area 51, and 9/11, and the flat earth, and Pizzagate, and QAnon...
Click to expand...

As has become sadly customary, you have replaced discussion with insults.

"When a thing's credentials look most plausible, lay it bare, observe its triviality, and strip it of the cloak of verbiage that dignifies it. Pretentiousness is the arch deceiver, and never more delusive than when you imagine your work is most meritorious." --Marcus Aurelius, The Meditations
 
PoS said:
Science doesnt make predictions based on estimates.
Click to expand...

So how do they predict the path of hurricanes? How about chances and locations of cancer metastases?
 
Jack Hays said:
As has become sadly customary, you have replaced discussion with insults.
Click to expand...

As has become sadly customary, you do not understand satire when you see it. :)
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Facebook Removed False Label After Scientists Said Climate ‘Alarmist’ Fact Checkers Are Targeting Them[/h][FONT=&quot]From The Daily Caller Chris White Tech Reporter September 24, 2019 4:17 PM ET Facebook removed a fact check after climate scientists said a partisan fact-checking group the company uses is defaming them. Another Facebook fact checker came under criticism after nixing an editorial from a pair of climatologists about the problems with climate models.…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
Threegoofs said:
You’ve never heard of confidence intervals?
Click to expand...

Thats fuzzy science, not real science.

ataraxia said:
So how do they predict the path of hurricanes?
Click to expand...
Science cannot predict when clouds form, but it can accurately project the path they take after it appears. so its more of an analysis than a prediction.
 
Last edited:
PoS said:
Thats fuzzy science, not real science.


Science cannot predict when clouds form, but it can accurately project the path they take after it appears. so its more of an analysis than a prediction.
Click to expand...

Use of confidence intervals is not ‘real science?

That’s so fantastically stupid it’s not even funny.
 
[h=1]IPCC breaks its own rules[/h]Posted on 25 Sep 19 by PAUL MATTHEWS • 9 Comments
Another day, another ‘new’ climate report. This one is something about oceans and ice. There’s nothing new in this report (see commentary from Roger Pielke here, here and here) so what’s the point? The answer is, of course, that the constant stream of climate reports is an attempt to keep the climate scare at the … Con
 
Threegoofs said:
Use of confidence intervals is not ‘real science?

That’s so fantastically stupid it’s not even funny.
Click to expand...

If you had any knowledge about them you'd know that they would only work if the stats are accurate- but if theyre estimates too, then youre SOL.
 
[h=2]Climate hysteria is unjustified[/h]
The UK’s key climate indicators have barely changed for 20 years. That’s according to a new paper from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which rebuts claims that the weather is getting worse.
According to author Paul Homewood, the Met Office’s Central England Temperature Record shows that temperatures have barely changed in 20 years and that there has been no increase in extremely hot days either:
“The summer of 2018 had just one day over 30 degrees, while 1976 had six. The Met Office’s data show that hot days are just not becoming more common.”
​
And there seems to be little to worry about on bad weather front either. There has been a gentle decline in storminess, and in most of the UK, there has been no change in either average rainfall or rainfall extremes:
“Only in Scotland has there been a noticeable increase”, says Homewood. “Climate hysteria is entirely overdone.”
​
[h=2]Paul Homewood: Plus Ça Change: The UK Climate in 2018 (pdf)[/h]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom