- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 80,541
- Reaction score
- 85,247
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
"The Georgia chapter of a Confederacy group filed a lawsuit Tuesday against a state park with the largest Confederate monument in the country, arguing officials broke state law by planning an exhibit on ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy.
in 2020, the Stone Mountain Memorial Association, which oversees Stone Mountain Park, voted in 2021 to relocate Confederate flags and build a “truth-telling” exhibit to reflect the site’s role in the rebirth of the Klu Klux Klan, along with the carving’s segregationist roots. ..."The interpretive themes developed for Stone Mountain will explore how the collective memory created by Southerners in response to the real and imagined threats to the very foundation of Southern society, the institution of slavery, by westward expansion, a destructive war, and eventual military defeat, was fertile ground for the development of the Lost Cause movement amidst the social and economic disruptions that followed," the exhibit proposal says.
Other parts of the exhibit would address how the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of Confederate Veterans perpetuated the “Lost Cause” ideology through support for monuments, education programs and racial segregation laws across the South. It would also tell stories of a small Black community that lived near the mountain after the war."
Link
Oddly, this AP article does not cite the law the Confederate group is using to challenge this change. Found it buried in this article:
"Much of this memorial is protected by old Georgia law, which states that the memorial must be maintained as "an appropriate and suitable memorial for the Confederacy.""
Link
Its an odd situation. Slavery was their self-professed cornerstone, but the feel it's representation here isn't a suitable and appropriate memorial.
Slavery would have to shown as a positive good, but I don't think anyone's buying that anymore.
Isn't it funny, we brought immigrants here in chains now we take them out in chains.Slavery would have to shown as a positive good, but I don't think anyone's buying that anymore.
Isn't it funny, we brought immigrants here in chains now we take them out in chains.
"Much of this memorial is protected by old Georgia law, which states that the memorial must be maintained as "an appropriate and suitable memorial for the Confederacy.""
We didn’t go far enough with reconstruction.
Gotta love laws written with vague language that can mean whatever politicians want.
"The Georgia chapter of a Confederacy group filed a lawsuit Tuesday against a state park with the largest Confederate monument in the country, arguing officials broke state law by planning an exhibit on ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy.
in 2020, the Stone Mountain Memorial Association, which oversees Stone Mountain Park, voted in 2021 to relocate Confederate flags and build a “truth-telling” exhibit to reflect the site’s role in the rebirth of the Klu Klux Klan, along with the carving’s segregationist roots. ..."The interpretive themes developed for Stone Mountain will explore how the collective memory created by Southerners in response to the real and imagined threats to the very foundation of Southern society, the institution of slavery, by westward expansion, a destructive war, and eventual military defeat, was fertile ground for the development of the Lost Cause movement amidst the social and economic disruptions that followed," the exhibit proposal says.
Other parts of the exhibit would address how the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of Confederate Veterans perpetuated the “Lost Cause” ideology through support for monuments, education programs and racial segregation laws across the South. It would also tell stories of a small Black community that lived near the mountain after the war."
Link
Oddly, this AP article does not cite the law the Confederate group is using to challenge this change. Found it buried in this article:
"Much of this memorial is protected by old Georgia law, which states that the memorial must be maintained as "an appropriate and suitable memorial for the Confederacy.""
Link
Its an odd situation. Slavery was their self-professed cornerstone, but the feel it's representation here isn't a suitable and appropriate memorial.
Slavery would have to shown as a positive good, but I don't think anyone's buying that anymore.
The Confederate States of America existed for two months before they started a war that led to their annihilation. This kind of stupidity deserves a memorial?"The Georgia chapter of a Confederacy group filed a lawsuit Tuesday against a state park with the largest Confederate monument in the country, arguing officials broke state law by planning an exhibit on ties to slavery, segregation and white supremacy.
in 2020, the Stone Mountain Memorial Association, which oversees Stone Mountain Park, voted in 2021 to relocate Confederate flags and build a “truth-telling” exhibit to reflect the site’s role in the rebirth of the Klu Klux Klan, along with the carving’s segregationist roots. ..."The interpretive themes developed for Stone Mountain will explore how the collective memory created by Southerners in response to the real and imagined threats to the very foundation of Southern society, the institution of slavery, by westward expansion, a destructive war, and eventual military defeat, was fertile ground for the development of the Lost Cause movement amidst the social and economic disruptions that followed," the exhibit proposal says.
Other parts of the exhibit would address how the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of Confederate Veterans perpetuated the “Lost Cause” ideology through support for monuments, education programs and racial segregation laws across the South. It would also tell stories of a small Black community that lived near the mountain after the war."
Link
Oddly, this AP article does not cite the law the Confederate group is using to challenge this change. Found it buried in this article:
"Much of this memorial is protected by old Georgia law, which states that the memorial must be maintained as "an appropriate and suitable memorial for the Confederacy.""
Link
Its an odd situation. Slavery was their self-professed cornerstone, but the feel it's representation here isn't a suitable and appropriate memorial.
Slavery would have to shown as a positive good, but I don't think anyone's buying that anymore.
Gotta love laws written with vague language that can mean whatever politicians want.
I've been to Stone Mountain. The rock relief is breathtaking.
View attachment 67578120
Why isn't this largest-in-the-world bas-relief sculpture of Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, and Stonewall Jackson enough for this particular Confederacy group?
I disagree. "appropriate and suitable" is vague.There's nothing vague about it. This was a Confederate monument, and as such, it can't say anything that in any way dishonors the legacy of Confederate slave-owning heritage.
The Confederate States of America existed for two months before they started a war that led to their annihilation. This kind of stupidity deserves a memorial?
I guess so, to some kinds of minds. When Atlanta got an NHL team they called it the Atlanta Flames, to commemorate the burning of the city by General Sherman. A bit like naming a Japanese baseball team the Hiroshima Mushroom Cloud, I would have thought, but I guess a certain mindset can be nostalgic about disastrous failure.
Sherman wouldn’t have been comfortable with having states named after him tho.We didn’t go far enough with reconstruction. The borders of the Southern states should have been completely unmade and reshaped with new names. “Georgia” and “South Carolina” should be the State of Sherman.
We should have wiped out southern planter culture root and branch.
Sherman wouldn’t have been comfortable with having states named after him tho.
How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of America: Richardson, Heather Cox: 9780190900908: Amazon.com: Books
How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of America [Richardson, Heather Cox] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of Americawww.amazon.com
I disagree. "appropriate and suitable" is vague.
There's far more to the topic, and that book is a great one for it, I recommend it.We have an antebellum Supreme Court that agrees more with Dred Scott and Plessy than it does with the Reconstruction amendments and Brown.
Georgia and Carolina are named for European monarchs.We didn’t go far enough with reconstruction. The borders of the Southern states should have been completely unmade and reshaped with new names. “Georgia” and “South Carolina” should be the State of Sherman.
We should have wiped out southern planter culture root and branch.
I'll try one more time. The language is vague. The fact that SOME politicians, that one political culture, views the language as having one meaning, doesn't change that. Imagine black progressive politicians were elected to run the state. How would they see the phrase? I'm leaving it at that.It's vague to people who have never lived in the former Confederacy, especially in the heart of it, which Georgia is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?