• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Computer becomes first to pass Turing Test in artificial intelligence...

More sci-fi fantasy But I like it. Its my guilty pleasure that keeps me going on.

Do your thing lil brave AI child.

 
Interesting point. But relating to the average human is still a huge step by my standards. Even if the average human is pretty annoying.
 
I've always thought the Turing test is bollocks. Being indistinguishable from a human to a human in a conversation doesn't prove consciousness.
 
The sole purpose of creating smarter and smarter machines is so they can take on more and more tasks for us.

Slaves? Maybe not technically. 2nd class beings? Inevitable.

well you could make them to create smarter and more talented people
 

humans would be more of a parasite on the ai then the planet in that case no need for it to care much about most species though I guess it might
 
Id like to think that eventually life becomes so efficient that cattle becomes a holographic homage to history. Something to trick the honest witnessing of predatory necessity while causing no undue pain or actual damage.
 
It sounds like the test was pretty rigged. The questioners had only five minutes and only 33% were convinced. I would be more impressed if the questioners were allowed to carry on a dialogue until they were satisfied. I can think of a lot of things I would try that might trip up a computer.
 
Sad how many responses here are silly attempts at humor but then when "Big Bang Theory" is the only source one seeks for science it is understandable. AI is dependent in part on Moore's Law which says computers double in capability every 18 months. Who builds these computers? Micio Kaku states quantum computers are on the not to distant horizon. These compute using seven atoms but again who will build them? If we build anything that is capable of surpassing human intelligence then why would we build it and do not try to say it could build itself. The cut off switch had saved thousands of lives in the past and will continue to do for so for many years to come.
 

Additionally, the "simulation" was of a child whose first language is not english. That adds a layer of doubt for oddly-worded responses.
 
****... sometimes when I chat with cleverbot its hard not to believe im actually talking to a real life philosopher. Until it ****s up.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…