• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Completed Wisconsin recount widens Donald Trump's lead by 131 votes

DA60 said:
I don't think so.

It was a very close state in a very close election.

I see nothing wrong with making certain of the results.
Click to expand...

But, it was not close. Not close at all. Trump had 1,404,000 votes to Jill Stein's 31,000 votes. There was no chance for Jill Stein to win with a recount. If Hillary wanted a recount then Hillary should have filed for a recount. Funny though, if Jill Stein hadn't been in the race and most of her votes had gone to Clinton, Hillary would have won the state and now Stein has sour grapes because Trump won so she wanted a recount. Candidates with no chance of winning shouldn't even be allowed to request a recount.
 

You understand why WI was significant and NH wasn't.... come on. Save your outrage for outrageous things..... If PA, MI and WI on recount changed, then NH would be relevant, but otherwise it was not.

yes, I also understand Stein's motives were not all together altrusitic, but in this case, what she wanted done needed to be done for the historic record. It was Clinton's prerogative, but she was going to exit that race with class and would not look so petty, especially when it was unlikely to change anything.

At the end of the day, however, Trump and America needed it done to be certain of the outcome.
 

And you never stopped to ask why they were saying it's racist, did you? You just stopped listening.
 
Deuce said:
And you never stopped to ask why they were saying it's racist, did you? You just stopped listening.
Click to expand...
At least you admit your previous statement is bull****. Props for that.

I KNOW why they claim its racist. Its their mantra. Its literally ALL they know. Racism, Class warfare, the war on women. That is the leftist playbook and they have run every single campaign since the 60s on it.
 

The North Carolina case was out in the open. If you can't see it, you're the problem in this discussion, not "the left."
 
Deuce said:
The North Carolina case was out in the open. If you can't see it, you're the problem in this discussion, not "the left."
Click to expand...
See...the problem when you shriek "wolf!!!' is that the villagers at some point know you are full of ****.
 
upsideguy said:
You understand why WI was significant and NH wasn't.... come on. Save your outrage for outrageous things..... If PA, MI and WI on recount changed, then NH would be relevant, but otherwise it was not.
Click to expand...
It wasn't relevant because Clinton won NH by a really slim margin. had trump won she would have challenged that one as well.


The courts disagreed with her.

At the end of the day, however, Trump and America needed it done to be certain of the outcome.
Click to expand...

It is now certain trump won.
 
ludin said:
It wasn't relevant because Clinton won NH by a really slim margin. had trump won she would have challenged that one as well.



The courts disagreed with her.



It is now certain trump won.
Click to expand...

But, but, but the Russians influenced the election. Surely the CIA will overturn the results!
 

And they have lost many elections since 2010 because of it but they haven't figured that out yet. Please don't tell them. They still think they can keep on saying that and having help from all of their celebrity friends and the mainstream media and the voters won't figure out that they are full of ****.
 
Moderate Right said:
But, but, but the Russians influenced the election. Surely the CIA will overturn the results!
Click to expand...

Ol that is the next depth of lowness from Clinton.

now they are trying to turn over classified data to the electors as some of them have requested
the CIA report.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…