- Joined
- May 29, 2025
- Messages
- 929
- Reaction score
- 503
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The company is 'Campus Guardian Angel' of Texas. They claim to have done 10,000 hours of training for operators for this thing, suggesting a substantial monetary force behind it. Split second decisions to break kids' bones - what could go wrong? But it is also terribly illuminating that such drone aeronautics might even be possible within a building. The Russia-Ukraine war has definitely come home now.'Then we escalate to the pepper mechanism so it's hard for them to see,' said Marston. 'Obviously, if we fly around the corner and we see a person with their gun raised, firing at kids, then we're going to immediately escalate to hitting them.' 'If you get hit by a drone at 60 or 70, miles an hour, it really sucks. It'll break ribs. It'll break bones. But our goal is to quickly incapacitate because they're trying to murder people.
Sensible gun control legislation is out of the question.
Because it works. Look at the gun homicide rates in different states and tell me it doesn't.Why do you believe that “gun control” laws would be obeyed by those intent on killing other people?
Because it works. Look at the gun homicide rates in different states and tell me it doesn't.
Apparently not strict enough.Doesn’t California have strict “gun control” laws?
Murders involving firearms by state U.S. 2023| Statista
In 2023, about 1,459 homicides were committed with the use of firearms in Texas.www.statista.com
Apparently not strict enough.
Nonsense.IIRC, the penalty for violating homicide laws is far greater than that for violating “gun control” laws. For the most part, “gun control” laws are simply attempts to convert our 2A rights into mere state issued privileges, thus are said to ‘work’ by reducing the number of folks who (legally) own guns.
Nonsense.
Why do you believe that “gun control” laws would be obeyed by those intent on killing other people?
If your argument is laws are useless because someone will just break them, why even bother to make killing people illegal, then?
My argument is that by definition criminals don’t obey laws.
Okay. So no laws is your answer?
Because it works. Look at the gun homicide rates in different states and tell me it doesn't.
Sensible gun control legislation is out of the question.
The homicide rate in IL is among the highest in the country, and CA and TX are basically the same when you account for demographics.
Perhaps, having strict “gun control” laws and adequately enforcing them are two very different things. See post #17.
That state is a freakin' mess in many ways.The homicide rate in IL is among the highest in the country,
Explain the demographics because the gun crime rate is higher in Texas.and CA and TX are basically the same when you account for demographics.
That's the problem. The gun control zealots believe in the fantasy that gun control laws can be effectively self-enforcing by reducing availability, as if that philosophy has worked for anything else (drugs?).
That state is a freakin' mess in many ways.
Explain the demographics because the gun crime rate is higher in Texas.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?