- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 14,012
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Location
- Southern Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
FBI Director James Comey confirmed on Thursday that some of Hillary Clinton's statements and explanations about her email server to the House Benghazi Committee last October were not true, as evidenced by the bureau's investigation into whether she mishandled classified information.
"And my real fear is this, this is what [Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)] touched upon, this double tracked justice system rightly or wrong hey perceived this country, that if you are a private in the Army and you email yourself classified information, you will be kicked out but if you are Hillary Clinton and you seek a promotion to commander-in-chief, you will not be," Gowdy concluded. "So what I hope you can do today is help the average person, the reasonable person you made reference to, the reasonable person understand, why she appears to be treated differently than the rest of us would be."
Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses - POLITICO
Yeah, I guess Comey's just another Republican (and originally a Bush appointee) that's "gone liberal". Funny how the moment that a Republican or a conservative says or does something against conservative dogma, well, ha-RUMPH, he's a traitor, a crook, a corrupted individual, a criminal, whatever...
...but when a Republican or conservative say something against conservative dogma, the one possibility that MUST NOT be considered is...maybe he was right!
Yeah, I guess Comey's just another Republican (and originally a Bush appointee) that's "gone liberal". Funny how the moment that a Republican or a conservative says or does something against conservative dogma, well, ha-RUMPH, he's a traitor, a crook, a corrupted individual, a criminal, whatever...
...but when a Republican or conservative say something against conservative dogma, the one possibility that MUST NOT be considered is...maybe he was right!
FBI Director James Comey confirmed on Thursday that some of Hillary Clinton's statements and explanations about her email server to the House Benghazi Committee last October were not true, as evidenced by the bureau's investigation into whether she mishandled classified information.
"And my real fear is this, this is what [Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)] touched upon, this double tracked justice system rightly or wrong hey perceived this country, that if you are a private in the Army and you email yourself classified information, you will be kicked out but if you are Hillary Clinton and you seek a promotion to commander-in-chief, you will not be," Gowdy concluded. "So what I hope you can do today is help the average person, the reasonable person you made reference to, the reasonable person understand, why she appears to be treated differently than the rest of us would be."
Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses - POLITICO
TrueTurn it around Glen....if this had been Bush, or Trump.....the liberals would have gone ape**** over this FBI decision!
I think it's wrong, I think she's guilty of a multitude of incompetence....and the bottom line here....She Does Not Deserve to be President!....never has!
Anyone who supports her ......is a pathetic sheeple.
Turn it around Glen....if this had been Bush, or Trump.....the liberals would have gone ape**** over this FBI decision!
I think it's wrong, I think she's guilty of a multitude of incompetence....and the bottom line here....She Does Not Deserve to be President!....never has!
Anyone who supports her ......is a pathetic sheeple.
Yeah, I guess Comey's just another Republican (and originally a Bush appointee) that's "gone liberal". Funny how the moment that a Republican or a conservative says or does something against conservative dogma, well, ha-RUMPH, he's a traitor, a crook, a corrupted individual, a criminal, whatever...
...but when a Republican or conservative say something against conservative dogma, the one possibility that MUST NOT be considered is...maybe he was right!
I'm just wondering - Do you feel she did anything wrong? Forget Liberal vs. Conservative - is there anything that you can admit to with regards to this entire event that you feel she did illegally or unethically?
Stay tuned.Would she be liable for lying under oath during the Benghazi hearings? I wonder why they wouldn't charge her in that respect?
Would she be liable for lying under oath during the Benghazi hearings? I wonder why they wouldn't charge her in that respect?
True
Then do not vote for her.
Most people say the same thing about those that support Trump.
Look Mick, when you got Bush Jr., Rumsfeld and Cheney walking around free as a bird, all faith is lost as far as holding our elected officials accountable anymore.
That ship done sailed a long time ago.
I think that she made a stupid mistake concerning her e-mail server - but I've seen people in very senior positions make stupid mistakes, too, particularly when it comes to technology that wasn't even dreamt of when they were young. That doesn't mean that they were bad at their jobs, because their jobs were much complex than this or that one issue. It meant that they were not at the time as conversant with modern technology as they needed to be. The smart ones, once they get a clue about their level of ignorance and its consequences, either learn the new tech or - more often - depend on those they can trust to cover the issues having to do with that new tech.
Here's one example. When I was on the USS Abraham Lincoln, I found out from a junior enlisted that it was easy to break into the MS Outlook folders of just about anyone on board. I checked out what he said, and found that I could very easily break into the e-mail files even of the Intel Officer. Does this mean that our Intel Officer - who as a matter of course would have had access to above-top-secret info - was bad at his job? Of course not! It meant that he was not as conversant with the technology as he needed to be. To make a long story short, it got taken care of.
The failure of our Intel Officer to keep his files secure wasn't a matter of legality or ethics - it was a matter of training, of a lack of technical knowledge. Same thing with Hillary - her failure with the e-mail server wasn't a matter of legality or ethics, but of training, of a lack of technical knowledge. That is what is at the root of the FBI Director's decision.
Turn it around Glen....if this had been Bush, or Trump.....the liberals would have gone ape**** over this FBI decision!
I think it's wrong, I think she's guilty of a multitude of incompetence....and the bottom line here....She Does Not Deserve to be President!....never has!
Anyone who supports her ......is a pathetic sheeple.
Yeah, I guess Comey's just another Republican (and originally a Bush appointee) that's "gone liberal". Funny how the moment that a Republican or a conservative says or does something against conservative dogma, well, ha-RUMPH, he's a traitor, a crook, a corrupted individual, a criminal, whatever...
...but when a Republican or conservative say something against conservative dogma, the one possibility that MUST NOT be considered is...maybe he was right!
I don't believe that for a second! I think she knew full well, everything that she was doing! She is no dummy, she's a cunning, treacherous, Crook...and a consummate Liar!
She's not incompetent...she's a Crook of the First Order and never should hold another public office and her security clearances should be pulled!!
Trump for President!
I think that she made a stupid mistake concerning her e-mail server - but I've seen people in very senior positions make stupid mistakes, too, particularly when it comes to technology that wasn't even dreamt of when they were young. That doesn't mean that they were bad at their jobs, because their jobs were much complex than this or that one issue. It meant that they were not at the time as conversant with modern technology as they needed to be. The smart ones, once they get a clue about their level of ignorance and its consequences, either learn the new tech or - more often - depend on those they can trust to cover the issues having to do with that new tech.
Here's one example. When I was on the USS Abraham Lincoln, I found out from a junior enlisted that it was easy to break into the MS Outlook folders of just about anyone on board. I checked out what he said, and found that I could very easily break into the e-mail files even of the Intel Officer. Does this mean that our Intel Officer - who as a matter of course would have had access to above-top-secret info - was bad at his job? Of course not! It meant that he was not as conversant with the technology as he needed to be. To make a long story short, it got taken care of.
The failure of our Intel Officer to keep his files secure wasn't a matter of legality or ethics - it was a matter of training, of a lack of technical knowledge. Same thing with Hillary - her failure with the e-mail server wasn't a matter of legality or ethics, but of training, of a lack of technical knowledge. That is what is at the root of the FBI Director's decision.
I think that she made a stupid mistake concerning her e-mail server - but I've seen people in very senior positions make stupid mistakes, too, particularly when it comes to technology that wasn't even dreamt of when they were young. That doesn't mean that they were bad at their jobs, because their jobs were much complex than this or that one issue. It meant that they were not at the time as conversant with modern technology as they needed to be. The smart ones, once they get a clue about their level of ignorance and its consequences, either learn the new tech or - more often - depend on those they can trust to cover the issues having to do with that new tech.
Here's one example. When I was on the USS Abraham Lincoln, I found out from a junior enlisted that it was easy to break into the MS Outlook folders of just about anyone on board. I checked out what he said, and found that I could very easily break into the e-mail files even of the Intel Officer. Does this mean that our Intel Officer - who as a matter of course would have had access to above-top-secret info - was bad at his job? Of course not! It meant that he was not as conversant with the technology as he needed to be. To make a long story short, it got taken care of.
The failure of our Intel Officer to keep his files secure wasn't a matter of legality or ethics - it was a matter of training, of a lack of technical knowledge. Same thing with Hillary - her failure with the e-mail server wasn't a matter of legality or ethics, but of training, of a lack of technical knowledge. That is what is at the root of the FBI Director's decision.
I already knew you were not going to vote for her or any other Democrat. Oh wait you support the Democrat Trump. My bad :lamoI wouldn't vote for her if she was the only candidate available.
Trump for President!
Did I read that Hillary was not put under oath by the FBI?
Did I read that Hillary was not put under oath by the FBI?
Yeah, I guess Comey's just another Republican (and originally a Bush appointee) that's "gone liberal". Funny how the moment that a Republican or a conservative says or does something against conservative dogma, well, ha-RUMPH, he's a traitor, a crook, a corrupted individual, a criminal, whatever...
...but when a Republican or conservative say something against conservative dogma, the one possibility that MUST NOT be considered is...maybe he was right!
Look Mick, when you got Bush Jr., Rumsfeld and Cheney walking around free as a bird, all faith is lost as far as holding our elected officials accountable anymore.
That ship done sailed a long time ago.
FBI Director James Comey confirmed on Thursday that some of Hillary Clinton's statements and explanations about her email server to the House Benghazi Committee last October were not true, as evidenced by the bureau's investigation into whether she mishandled classified information.
"And my real fear is this, this is what [Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)] touched upon, this double tracked justice system rightly or wrong hey perceived this country, that if you are a private in the Army and you email yourself classified information, you will be kicked out but if you are Hillary Clinton and you seek a promotion to commander-in-chief, you will not be," Gowdy concluded. "So what I hope you can do today is help the average person, the reasonable person you made reference to, the reasonable person understand, why she appears to be treated differently than the rest of us would be."
Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses - POLITICO
Declaring financial bankruptcy is legal and can be made right through various remedies. Moral indignation about financial bankruptcy is perverse and pathological.
Ethical and moral bankruptcy are forever. There is no remediation. Murder is a crime punishable by death. Hillary Clinton killed Americans. She should pay. To support Hillary Clinton is to admit that you are ethically and morally bankrupt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?