- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,665
- Reaction score
- 75,614
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Not today, because trash as you and I may see it, can no longer be discriminated against because that means we have made a moral judgment. And under the discrimination laws in certain states that isn't allowed.
i didnt think he would but its polite to give a person a opportunity to explain their positions instead of guessing
Do your own searches Critical and as a suggestion you may want to start with "under-aged sex being challenged" or "incest laws being challenged"
Vesper is a woman.
There is no guessing. He slipped up and let it out. He was challenged on it. Directly asked. He play the "I have gay friends" card.
He has had numerous chances to simply say he does not believe homosexuality is comparable to child molestation. He has refused to answer. As such, it is quite clear how he feels about it.
You want to share a gender with her, then feel free.
untied nations is meaningless to the united states of america laws and rights
BUT if you want to talk about the UN who just earliey this year mad a committee to fight against the discrimination of gays you can start that thread and ill provide you with the info
thank you again for proving you dont know what it is and that penis cake does not apply
it is factually not illegal discrimination your post loses and gets destroyed by facts again
Seriously you guys crack me up. And there is a great irony here.
The minute she said she decorated cakes as a business should have been your first clue...as only a GAY man would have that job. LMAO
I'm sorry, I'm just joking about the stereotype but it was still an obvious clue.
1.)Being full of **** and not being able to discern the consequences of laws passed is truly devastating for the rest of us.
2.)Because you were so willing to open the door, over emotion or some political correct thinking
3.), you have paved the way for just about anything to be seen as a discrimination in regard to business owners and how they treat their customers.
4.) If a business owner denies a gay couple a friggin wedding cake on moral conscience
5.) then the asshole that wants a erected penis on his cake has the same rights to file discrimination against anyone who does not want to provide him/her with what they want. Period.
There is no guessing. He slipped up and let it out. He was challenged on it. Directly asked. He play the "I have gay friends" card.
He has had numerous chances to simply say he does not believe homosexuality is comparable to child molestation. He has refused to answer. As such, it is quite clear how he feels about it.
The he you refer to is a "she". And because I brought up pediphiles in the same sentence with homosexuals and incest you find that offensive because you are gay. It wasn't to offend you or any other gay but to point out that since the redefining of marriage, all forms of sexuality will be challenged in the future. And some of them that supported gay marriage will not be willing to support others. And because they found it fitting to go after those who did not support gay marriage, by forcing them under "discrimination laws" to comply, What will they do when some judge decides discrimination of incest is wrong using the same arguments the gay community has used to support their argument?
LOL....so now the bigots are the ones being oppressed? Wow.....nice attempt at turning the tables. Its like the racists who try to claim that those pointing out their racism are really the racists....too funny.
all factually 100% false
they are legally, intellectually and factually not the same thing , this fact will never change
also there is no force
facts prove this post wrong again
There are things that are protected under the anti-discrimination laws. Those are not nearly as extensive as general public taste and individuality.
There's really no support for taking a moral position and hiding it under a religious belief. Because as I pointed out, if you were strictly follow your religious beliefs, you couldnt serve many people....a Catholic baker would not bake a wedding cake for someone getting remarried. You would not bake a cake for a barmitzpha. It's selective....and that's hypocritical IMO.
THere are many people I'd want to turn away, like adulterers. People that beat their kids or animals, goth people. But business isnt about making those moral judgements on your customers. And to hide behind religion to do it is cowardice and hypocritical IMO.
What will they do when some judge decides discrimination of incest is wrong using the same arguments the gay community has used to support their argument?
Being full of **** and not being able to discern the consequences of laws passed is truly devastating for the rest of us. Because you were so willing to open the door, over emotion or some political correct thinking, you have paved the way for just about anything to be seen as a discrimination in regard to business owners and how they treat their customers. If a business owner denies a gay couple a friggin wedding cake on moral conscience, then the asshole that wants a erected penis on his cake has the same rights to file discrimination against anyone who does not want to provide him/her with what they want. Period.
translation: another dodgeSo you keep regurgitating, doesn't make it true either. Put up something or else shut the.........
What will they do when some judge decides discrimination of incest is wrong using the same arguments the gay community has used to support their argument?
What this tells me is...
1. You don't know the arguments for same sex marriage. You assume you do. I can certainly tell you that "consent" is a part of the argument for same sex marriage. Please commit that to memory.
2. Your arguments against incest are so piss poor that the best you can come up with against it is "well the gays cannot get married."
3. You still will not simply state, "I believe homosexuality is not comparable to incest."
Really? Where does it say that? The baker draws the line at wedding cakes for Gays because he supports marriage as being between a man and a woman. This is freedom of religion. They are welcome to go elsewhere to get a cake.You really don't have a clue, do you?The baker had no problem making wedding cakes. If a baker makes wedding cakes for some customers, then he can't refuse to make wedding cakes for others on the basis or race, gender, sexual orientation, etc
Which law are you referring to here? Once he makes a penis cake he's hooked on providing penis cakes for life??With regards to penis cakes, if a baker does not make penis cakes for anyone, then the baker can not be forced to make penis cakes for anyone. If the baker does make penis cakes for some people, then the baker can't refuse to make penis cakes for some people on the basis of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, etc.
Really? My arguments are so piss poor and yours are by all means stellar examples of justice ! Yeah right.
I do not see any form of sexual activity seeking rights that redefines the traditional definition of marriage worthy of violating and at the expense of other's rights, including property and religious freedom and to be in violation of the first amendment.
I don't need to share another thing with you, just stay tuned what will be the aftermath of what you sought in the name of discrimination.and what arguments/precedence factually translate between the two and can only be said of equal rights for gay, please share with us
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I don't need to share another thing with you, just stay tuned what will be the aftermath of what you sought in the name of discrimination.
You really don't have a clue, do you?
The baker had no problem making wedding cakes. If a baker makes wedding cakes for some customers, then he can't refuse to make wedding cakes for others on the basis or race, gender, sexual orientation, etc
With regards to penis cakes, if a baker does not make penis cakes for anyone, then the baker can not be forced to make penis cakes for anyone. If the baker does make penis cakes for some people, then the baker can't refuse to make penis cakes for some people on the basis of race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?