that's why i get away with murdering everybody who steps onto my lawn.
another failed insult and more incivilityyou dont have a clue...
States can pass statuatory law regulating commerce within its' borders. It's a power of a sovereign state.
i have stated you are correct.
however states laws do not override constitutional law...or u.s.code........and the DOI is u.s.code
No. If they do not consent to provide the potential consumer service then no ones rights are violated. The consumer nor the businessman has the right to force the other party into the transaction for their benefit.
The constitution is a limit on the federal govt, not the state.
I understand what you're saying, don't get me wrong.
The simple fact of the matter is that we know what the world looks like when we do it your way, and it is barbaric and stupid and promotes inequality. You argument implies that we should let people create de facto discrimination because they have that right. Discrimination doesn't uphold rights! Don't you see that? It is clear that the goal of this nation was to let all men be born free and let their will and determinations define who they are and who we are as a people. We cannot be born equal if we live in a world where we are denied the services almost everybody else receives simply because we were born black, or a woman, or gay. The people agree with me on this one and for all of my ancestors, I thank god this will never change back to the stupidity it used to be. You lost this one a long time ago, but feel free to waste your breath arguing in favor of prejudice and hatred. Oh, I'm sorry, I mean in favor of the wonderful freedom to be disgusted by gay people and deny them your goods and/or services. What a tragic loss for the homophobes.
wrong, the constitution WAS a limit of the federal government only, however that changed with the civil war, and states were included.
according to you then the first amendment then does not apply to states......is it time for a state religion?
Who is murdering you by not providing you service? You are being ignored, not murdered.
Right, the hospital my great grandfather went to merely ignored him. Then he died from being ignored. It's not murder, it's just letting a person die, totally different. Why should hospitals have to treat Jews? Every time a hospital lets a Jew die, it makes my heart warm because I know that those doctors are truly free. It's totally worth letting a lot of people die for.
No, according to you, the constitution limits the Feds but not the States.
Right, the hospital my great grandfather went to merely ignored him. Then he died from being ignored. It's not murder, it's just letting a person die, totally different. Why should hospitals have to treat Jews? Every time a hospital lets a Jew die, it makes my heart warm because I know that those doctors are truly free. It's totally worth letting a lot of people die for.
i stated to you in the past, that is the way the founders set it up, that it only applied to the federal government, however unfortunately, the USSC changed it and included the states after the civil war.
Unless they refused to sell him cake this post is totally off topic.
You claimed that USSC didn't have the authority to change the constitution. Now you're claiming it does.
Yes, it is totally different. Sorry, if that upsets you.
Unless they refused to sell him cake this post is totally off topic.
i am saying that is what they did,...i dont like it.
are you saying states can set up their own state religions?
No, it doesn't upset me. You want an America where hospitals let people die for being Jewish. I think that's great. I think you should tell everybody you meet that you think hospitals should be allowed to let all their Jewish patients die. It would save me the trouble of having to explain to people why these equal protection laws are so important. Plus, you'd make so many new friends!
No, it's not off topic, it's part of the reason these laws exist. A bakery sells cake and a hospital treats patients.
Seriously, I have to explain that to you?
You want an America where hospitals let people die for being Jewish.
This is quite a serious charge. Can you point out where this was said?
wrong you have NO exercisable rights on another person's property.
The right to force people to associate with you.
The right to get service from other people against their will.
The right to enter property that is not your own.
The right to use resources that are not your own.
wrong!
this is case of discrimination, it is not a crime.
if government states that a one citizen MUST serve another citizen, that is involuntary servitude, and it is unconstitutional
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?