I think what he's saying is that since Cochran won by about 8000 votes, unless the vast majority of the ~8500 questionable votes are actually thrown out, it won't matter.You clearly are confused, and obviously didn't understand the simple word of "if", because if the 8300 hundred are "actual questionable ballots," then yes it is sufficient number to force another run-off. Or in the alternative, Cochran can concede.
So again, pay attention to what was said and not to what you wanted to have been said.
And that 8300 hundred is only out of what they were allowed to look at.
Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records
[...]
State Sen. Chris McDaniel is trying to prove that some people who voted in the June 24 runoff also voted in the June 3 Democratic primary, which would be illegal. His goal is to force another runoff.
On Monday, he asked the court for an emergency order forcing Harrison County Circuit Clerk Gayle Parker to let him see original copies of poll books.
[...]
Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records
Miss. high court seeks more info from McDaniel
He has a claim that is being entertained, let the courts figure it out.
As for your juvenile "Get on with your life" comment. :doh That clearly is what you need to do.
I provided an update to that which some find interesting.
And while you may want to be (as displayed by your behavior), you are not the arbiter of what gets posted, or of what others find interesting. So yeah, your own words apply more to you than to me.
You do realize that "tea bagger" was actually coined by members of the tea party movement? It was only after members of the liberal press had fun with the name that thae red-faced tea partiers tried deflect and sell us on the notion that the libs made up the name. Want to see a hundred pictures of tea parties wearing tea bags and holding declaring themselves "tea-baggers"?
You clearly are confused, and obviously didn't understand the simple word of "if", because if the 8300 hundred are "actual questionable ballots," then yes it is sufficient number to force another run-off. Or in the alternative, Cochran can concede.
So again, pay attention to what was said and not to what you wanted to have been said.
And that 8300 hundred is only out of what they were allowed to look at.
Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records
[...]
State Sen. Chris McDaniel is trying to prove that some people who voted in the June 24 runoff also voted in the June 3 Democratic primary, which would be illegal. His goal is to force another runoff.
On Monday, he asked the court for an emergency order forcing Harrison County Circuit Clerk Gayle Parker to let him see original copies of poll books.
[...]
Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records
Miss. high court seeks more info from McDaniel
He has a claim that is being entertained, let the courts figure it out.
As for your juvenile "Get on with your life" comment. :doh That clearly is what you need to do.
I provided an update to that which some find interesting.
And while you may want to be (as displayed by your behavior), you are not the arbiter of what gets posted, or of what others find interesting. So yeah, your own words apply more to you than to me.
Even so it should not be swept under the rug. Someone should be investigating the accusations by a black pastor that he and many others were actually paid to go vote for Cochran. Not to mention the Race baiting ads that were perpetrated by Henry Barbour who was doing the Republican establishments bidding here.I understand the word "if".... and, as used in this case, the word "if" is of such low probability as to be almost non-sensical. The chance of ALL 8,300 ballots being of error and being thrown out is almost 'nil" He just doesn't have a enough "questionable" ballots to have any case. In fact, the low number of those "questionable" ballots vis-a-vis the vote differential is a great argument for the validation of the election.
What's a "dirty sanchez"?I don't regard as "naïve" those who aren't up on the trendy sexual references. Speaks to the juvenility of those who seized on the "teabagger" thing. Maybe it's even a virtue not knowing what a donkey punch or dirty sanchez is.
Nothing you want to know about. I know I don't.What's a "dirty sanchez"?
What's a "donkey punch"?
What he is saying is irrelevant to that which he replied.I think what he's saying is that since Cochran won by about 8000 votes, unless the vast majority of the ~8500 questionable votes are actually thrown out, it won't matter.
You obviously didn't understand the "if" as presented. Because if those are "actual questionable ballots," he has more than enough to force another run-off.I understand the word "if".... and, as used in this case, the word "if" is of such low probability as to be almost non-sensical. The chance of ALL 8,300 ballots being of error and being thrown out is almost 'nil" He just doesn't have a enough "questionable" ballots to have any case. In fact, the low number of those "questionable" ballots vis-a-vis the vote differential is a great argument for the validation of the election.You clearly are confused, and obviously didn't understand the simple word of "if", because if the 8300 hundred are "actual questionable ballots," then yes it is sufficient number to force another run-off. Or in the alternative, Cochran can concede.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?