- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,480
- Reaction score
- 17,287
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yes, sure does.
If the Clinton administration only had better policy in place, it might have been prevented.
-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
CNN Poll: 70% see Dem's loss of Supermajority as good thing
- Thread starter Grim17
- Start date
Yes, sure does.
If the Clinton administration only had better policy in place, it might have been prevented.
pugetsoundwa
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2010
- Messages
- 252
- Reaction score
- 67
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
LOL Nice attempt at a duck...One could as easily blame all past Presidents. Hey if reagan this or that..if Nixon this or that. The bottom line is it happened on Bush's watch. 9 months into his first term is roughly 20% of a term. Not a short time by Presidental standards.
ScottD
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2009
- Messages
- 977
- Reaction score
- 412
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
You guys are the ones blaming Obama for Fort Hood and the failed Christmas Day attack, yet they happened around the same time into Obama's presidency as 9-11 happened in Bush's presidency.
Either back off of Obama for Fort Hood and the failed Christmas Bombing, or start blaming Bush for 9-11.