- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If an official chooses to conduct official business via private email then that email becomes an official record.
Again, please show me where it states that private email are to be preserved and the state has the power to acquire those emails....
Im still waiting on you to show me where in the act it states that private emails are to be preserved and the state has the power to acquire them
So you claim that this document is around, and you have seen it but you cannot even tell me how to obtain this document?
which is why she released 55,000 pages of emails upon request.
How do you know this? Because she said she did? What is there to stop her from not sending emails that to state that make her look bad?Right after you cite the section Hillary violated! She has archived her emails, and transferred the relevant records to the State Department. There is no deadline in that statute, or any requirement that they all be transferred.
And there's a reason you didn't mention Colin Powell.
How do you know this? Because she said she did? What is there to stop her from not sending emails that to state that make her look bad?
Do you have any proof she isn't preserving her emails?
Her defenders' focus on the legalities is just an attempt to draw the question as narrowly as possible. The real danger for Hillary is that this episode raises questions of judgment and transparency that can be raised at will by her opponents, Dems as well as Repubs.
Yeah, and my understanding is that FSO Maxwell was fired because he witnessed the separation of documents related to Benghazi into potentially damaging ones and those that were not. Those that were not considered damaging were forwarded to the ARB. Nice, huh? What a set up. She will have to answer questions - most likely until she withdraws from public life, at the very least. That's my hope, anyway. Ethics have become a short sell commodity.
No you havent. You just made a claim. I asked you to provide the sources..I already showed you.
No you underlined and bolded 2 words.I underlined and bolded the relevant parts even.
Nothing in here.. Pretty much just states, the clinton administration is committed to keeping openness and that all federal agencies need to keep the openness, and then something about speeding up FOI requests..
Again nothing here that backs up your claim. Something about repealing the defense departments 1981 guidelins, doing a review of the FOI process, and addressing teh "backlog" of FOI requets..
Nope still didnt break this act either.
She still didnt violate this... Its the same act you linked above.
This act actually shows she didnt break the law, because the revised portion wasnt passed until she was out of office in 2014, and she left office in 2013. Lets say this bill was enacted before she left office, then yes she would of broke the law. But since this revised bill passed after she left office she didnt break the law.
Absolutely not. Some of you are waxing eloquently about legalities within the 2014 law and at the same time claiming she did nothing to violate the law in force at the time. Go read the 1950 Act and tell me about the penalties. Have you read any of the hacked emails? Doesn't sound like it.
Are you kidding? Was it not you that used a "Banter" web site, with a far leftests opinion on the subject to reply to me earlier? Oh I see, your own standards don't apply to you though do they?
Oh brother! :roll: First, it is noted that you choose to use a highly biased site, and a snarky little troll on that site to refute what is absolutely a scandal, and a problem for Clinton's trustworthiness for 2016.
Clinton is the same person that gave us:
"Benghazi was about a video"
"At this point what does it matter?!"
"I consider myself an early 20th Century progressive"
"My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. You know, I just, I don't understand it." --on why she is staying in the race
"I'm not going to put my lot in with economists." --after being asked by George Stephanopoulos about economists' claims that her gas tax holiday proposal would not bring down gas prices
"I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base." --on visiting Bosnia in 1996, contradicting other accounts that said there was no threat of gunfire. Clinton later said she "misspoke"
"Aww don't feel noways tired. I've come too faarrr from where I started frum." --adopting a Southern drawl while speaking at a church...
Come on man, this is just another in the long line of red flags that tell us that Hillary is just not an honest person, or trustworthy enough to be the President of the United States....I mean look what happens when we elect a liar....We get Obama, or even Bush if you prefer....It isn't good for the nation....But maybe that is your goal, it isn't mine.
Her defenders' focus on the legalities is just an attempt to draw the question as narrowly as possible. The real danger for Hillary is that this episode raises questions of judgment and transparency that can be raised at will by her opponents, Dems as well as Repubs.
Not when the email server was at the Clinton residence where she or one of her goons could simply delete any email she would consider harmful to her.
Perhaps some defenders are, but the reason the some of us are discussing 'legalities' is the articles and now you guys are making allegations of law breaking and keep getting stumped on what section of any law that she did violate.
Perhaps some defenders are, but the reason the some of us are discussing 'legalities' is the articles and now you guys are making allegations of law breaking and keep getting stumped on what section of any law that she did violate.
Story was surfaced in the NYT. Repubs aren't connected there.
:lamoHow lucky for wench Hillary. However she still broke the law.
But why would I care about penalties when I can't find any part of the law she violated, and no one will point me to the relevant section and then say how that section proves she's not in compliance.
Cool. That doesnt change ****.
You're a couple of days behind the news - no one has any clue where the server is, but it's about a 99.999% probability it ain't in her basement. That AP story that alleged that was laughably sloppy - it assumed that because the bills went to her house the server was at her house.
:lamo
"she broke the law even though the law that regulates private email use by federal employees was enacted after she left federal office"
Just means it's likely an oppo research hit by anti-Hillary Dems.
The federal law applies to all official communications regardless of format.
No it doesnt. Not. At. All.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?