Stu Ghatze
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2005
- Messages
- 531
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Moderator's Warning: |
Some folks have trouble understand ing this even though I've tried highlighting each of the items. So, in that light, please don't take offense at how simply I'm going top break this down. It's not directed at you in particular. In order to post someone else's material (copyrighted material in particular) there are a two (2) guidelines that must be followed. That's all, just two. #1 All material posted from copyrighted material MUST contain a link to the original work. All means all and must means must. All such material must contain a link to the original source. Stu Ghatze, your piece did not have a link to the original source. And in ADDITON to this #2 Please do not post entire articles. I'm not sure how to clarify this. But, if needed, I will try. Stu Ghatze, you posted the entire article. Please do not do this. What you should have done: Proper format is to paraphrase the contents of an article and/or post relevant excerpts and then link to the rest. So remember, two guidelines which both must be followed at the same time. These guidelines, as well as others can be found here Forum Rules Thanks, your humble mod, SWM |
Simon W. Moon said:
Moderator's Warning:
Some folks have trouble understand ing this even though I've tried highlighting each of the items. So, in that light, please don't take offense at how simply I'm going top break this down. It's not directed at you in particular.
In order to post someone else's material (copyrighted material in particular) there are a two (2) guidelines that must be followed. That's all, just two.
#1 All material posted from copyrighted material MUST contain a link to the original work. All means all and must means must. All such material must contain a link to the original source.
Stu Ghatze, your piece did not have a link to the original source.
And in ADDITON to this
#2 Please do not post entire articles. I'm not sure how to clarify this. But, if needed, I will try.
Stu Ghatze, you posted the entire article. Please do not do this.
What you should have done:
Proper format is to paraphrase the contents of an article and/or post relevant excerpts and then link to the rest.
So remember, two guidelines which both must be followed at the same time.
These guidelines, as well as others can be found here Forum Rules
Thanks, your humble mod,
SWM
Bush wants to give the Indians Nukes. Not quite the same as "that can be used for".Stu Ghatze said:I simply love it when "some" leading democrats in the democratic party leadership "PRETEND" to be concerned about National Security issues as if they are the progenators of america's security!
When in fact the democrats had to come kicking & screaming to the realization that there IS real terrorism going on, & that 9/11 was real, ..along with their friends in the media have done everything possible to portray Bush as a nazi, a liar, & one who loves exploiting other nations for oil, & how Bush is supposidly mistreating peaceful muslims!
Golly geewhiz, ..only the ''democrats" can save us! Huh huh...! :2razz:
While Bill Clinton was up to his ears in GIVING technology away to the Chinese, ..Bill these days is out "advising" the UAE on how to get the Dubai Port sale done, ..his dear wife Hillary is pretending that the pending port sale is the greatest threat to America's security!
There ain't nothing like the democratic party living in their "alternate reality state"!:smile:
Read on:
Clinton Gave China Chips for Nuclear War
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2003
Newly declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat.
Simon W. Moon said:As long as we're complaining, can we also talk about the chair of GWB's Defense Policy Advisory Board who tried to use his influence at the Pentagon to sell the phone lines that the US Army uses to a Chinese military intelligence agency despite the objections of the FBI and the NSA?
This is the guy giving Bush defense policy advice. Think it abou it.
I wish that there were Good Guys and Bad Guys instead of this ambiguous mix of bad and worse.teacher said:You are damn right. The point being that both sides could really care less about anything as long as their cronies make cash and they stay in power? Incumbency and cash is the root of all evil in this nation.
I want the US to be the OPEC of the next major energy source. I want a Space Race for alternative fuels. If we control the energy and we are the world's market place, folks won't have much choice but to allow our culture into theirs - that's how they'll make their money.teacher said:I get way more play and responce to some idiotic Top Ten then I ever will by pointing out that neither friggin party has done a damn thing to wean us off of foreign oil.
Stu Ghatze said:While Bill Clinton was up to his ears in GIVING technology away to the Chinese, ..Bill these days is out "advising" the UAE on how to get the Dubai Port sale done, ..his dear wife Hillary is pretending that the pending port sale is the greatest threat to America's security!
Clinton Gave China Chips for Nuclear War
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2003
Newly declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat.
Stu Ghatze said:While Bill Clinton was up to his ears in GIVING technology away to the Chinese, ..Bill these days is out "advising" the UAE on how to get the Dubai Port sale done, ..his dear wife Hillary is pretending that the pending port sale is the greatest threat to America's security!
Clinton Gave China Chips for Nuclear War
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2003
Newly declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat.
$$ talks louder than words. Follow the money trail, and all the facts come out.Simon W. Moon said:As long as we're complaining, can we also talk about the chair of GWB's Defense Policy Advisory Board who tried to use his influence at the Pentagon to sell the phone lines that the US Army uses to a Chinese military intelligence agency despite the objections of the FBI and the NSA?
This is the guy giving Bush defense policy advice. Think it abou it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?