• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting


Been there, done that and have a BS degree, yours? It's obvious you need to take your own advice seriously. Ditch the cult reverence and learn to understand what we do know of the system right now. Do that and it will be clear to you that the AGW marketing arm is not giving you the straight poop.
 
Oh, so your argument is, the slow down in global warming is a part of global warming?

Can you possibly imagine how your sound?

How does the "slow down" sound in the face of the past decade being the warmest on record?
 
How does the "slow down" sound in the face of the past decade being the warmest on record?

I can answer that.
The gov't wants to say the Global Warming data is inconclusive and it's not our fault.
Corporate says that we have paid scientists to say that Global Warming is not supported by our data, and it's not our fault.
Big Energy pays $10,000 for each paper by a Phd that suggests Global Warming is not real, and it's not our fault.
Chemical corporations can also pay for Engineers who will state Global Warming data is incomplete, and it's not our fault.
Universities supported by grants from Energy, Chemical, Financial or Corporate benefactors will direct research to support the Grantors requests, and it's not our fault.
The 99% of scientists who acknowledge Global Warming as real went to lesser non-corporate grantor Institutions, and it's the fault of the preceding four and subsequent two.
The Gov't influenced Media will act as stenographers for gov't and corporate who pay their bills, and it's not their fault.
The Military will spout whatever line the political power in charge dictates, word for word, and it's not their fault.
Sounds like logic and reason will not be required this season, eh?
 
Last edited:
How does the "slow down" sound in the face of the past decade being the warmest on record?

How far back does the "record" that you speak of go?

Who's numbers are you relying on?

Look Ditto, responsible people don't go around claiming "hottest on record", they show the data....What is the rise in temp? .0002 of 1 degree?

Yeah, talk to the hand.
 

You exhale that evil Co2 while doing nothing but spewing propaganda...You should think about that.
 

Let me google that for you
 
You exhale that evil Co2 while doing nothing but spewing propaganda...You should think about that.

I am the one that is thinking!
 

I have been.
Hands don't listen so well.

Warmest decade on record


That's according to NOAA.

Now, counter that with a blog written by someone with an agenda, but no scientific backing.

Global warming did not end 15 years ago, period.
 
I have been.
Hands don't listen so well.

Warmest decade on record



That's according to NOAA.

Now, counter that with a blog written by someone with an agenda, but no scientific backing.

Global warming did not end 15 years ago, period.

Maybe not, but you still didn't answer the question...Figures...Anyway, guess what, man's exhaling didn't cause any Global warming, just as my F-150 didn't either...So, like it or not, your attempt to make a declarative statement, end it with "period", and shut the debate on the matter without answering the question posed to you is proof that this is all a bunch of hooey.
 
Obama's Energy declares a "war on coal".... Wonderful....Hope y'all are warm this winter with no power.
 

Your question had nothing to do with carbon dioxide exhaled from your lungs or mine, your F150 or my Tundra. It was about the amount of warming and the source of the information.

It was, to wit:


I believe everything was covered in my link, except perhaps for the amount of warming. While the numbers vary depending on geographical location, the average is somewhere around 1 degree C.
 
That's according to NOAA.

Now, counter that with a blog written by someone with an agenda, but no scientific backing.

OK. Here. BTW are you suggesting that NOAA has no agenda?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…