To be fair, I do think you are missing some part of the heat exchange. But at the same time, I understand the error ranges are great enough so I will not say you are wrong like he claims certainty of. i do think you are interpreting part of it incorrect though.
If I don't know as much as I think I do then why have I been able to show that you and longview are wrong about climate science repeatedly over the years while you have very rarely shown me to be wrong?
I understand the data just fine. That is why all the legitimate studies you keep citing agree with me and contradict you.
And every single climate scientist working in the field believes this to be true. The study you cited last Tuesday explicitly states this is happening several times. It is ONLY YOU who believes otherwise.
This is just more lies. The measured downward longwave energy has been increasing, so the planet is gaining longwave energy. And GHGs do affect the shortwave spectrum both directly and indirectly. Those indirect effects are known as feedbacks.
That is a figment of your imagination. You do not show me wrong. You alter my words to create a straw-man to win against.
What's the matter, Lord? Are you unable to just admit the truth that longview is lying about the science of climate change? Much of what he keeps claiming is directly contradicted by most of the studies he cites.
Yeah... well fortunately for me I can cite peer-reviewed and published studies that back me up. Longview can't cite any that back up his favorite lies.
This is nothing but another of your pathetic lies. I have shown you to be wrong many many times. I never intentionally alter your words. And I know for a fact that you can't cite a single instance where I did.
Yes, you do repeat this lie quite frequently whenever you can't refute the fact that I often prove you wrong.
With empirical results? I think not.
Can you show us a study that shows empirical evidence that CO2 has a net warming using the entire column of the atmosphere with all its feedback mechanisms positive and negative?
Hell, I believe it causes an overall warming. that does not mean it is true. My opinion is not fact. i will not make such a stupid arrogant statement because I understand how the error ranges and other factors involved can change the outcome.
The study surmises that by seeing an approximate 0.2 increased downward forcing of CO2 spectra from 2000 to 2011, for an approximate CO2 increase from 369 ppm to 385 ppm.
If the entire greenhouse effect, cloud return, and other atmospheric variables remained the same with no change, a hotter surface will return more downward longwave. If the surface radiate 0.1% more heat upward, then al,the spectra will increase by 0.1% downward.
You are the one that does not understand how to interpret science.
Buzz words don’t change the observed data!
No, there is data showing an increase in the surface longwave radiation, but that would only matter if it was matched by a decrease in the outbound longwave radiation. Unfortunately the outbound longwave radiation increased in that same timeframe, meaning that net longwave flux (longwave energy imbalance) decreased.
This is just another of your zombie lies that has been debunked numerous times by several different people including myself repeatedly. And every single study you have cited to show the CERES satellite data you base this on says you are wrong.
You have not provided any evidence that I am wrong!
And yet another pathetic lie.
You were wrong then and are still wrong!
Then show us the evidence. Observation shows that it does help warm the atmoshere. However, there seems to be no emperocal evidence that more CO2 in the atmosphere causes any significant increase.
Recent satellite data indicates our current warming is coming from mor absorbed solar energy. Here you go denying science again.
Only on one aspect, but I am not certain he is wrong. I dont carry around the DK effect like you do.
I different interpretation does not make for a lie.
I found an interesting study by some researchers attempting to validate the concept.
They verified what we are observing in the atmosphere, IR backscatter is happening, but the amount is not enough
www.eenews.net
abcnews.go.com
mountainstatespotlight.org
Trump's want agencies to focus on the "benefits" with climate change.
Trump’s next climate move: Show global warming benefits humanity
A new federal report downplaying or denying climate change could drive a reversal of climate rules and expansion of executive authority.
While Republican states are hurt by devastating weather events.
4 dead and 142 injured in Oklahoma wildfires; more than 400 homes damaged statewide
The National Weather Service's Storm Prediction Center warned of "near historic" fire conditions in the Plains.
Days before devastating storms, Gov. Morrisey proposed no flood protection money for West Virginians
Morrisey offered no money in his budget for a special trust to fund flood mitigation projects that has sat empty since it was created.
wmo.int
nca2023.globalchange.gov
So again, do you believe that if the CO2 level stops increasing, that all bed weather events around the world will stop?Climate change leads to more frequent and devastating weather events.
Climate change impacts grip globe in 2024
The year 2024 is set to be the warmest on record, capping a decade of unprecedented heat fuelled by human activities, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Greenhouse gas levels continue to grow to record observed highs, locking in even more heat for the future.
There the National Climate Assessment program have been ongoing since the early 90's. So Republican politicians and their staff have had every opportunity to scrutinize the evidence. With the results that the National Climate Assessment reports have continuned to show the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions.
From 2018:
"The impacts of climate change are already being felt in communities across the country. More frequent and intense extreme weather and climate-related events, as well as changes in average climate conditions, are expected to continue to damage infrastructure, ecosystems, and social systems that provide essential benefits to communities. Future climate change is expected to further disrupt many areas of life, exacerbating existing challenges to prosperity posed by aging and deteriorating infrastructure, stressed ecosystems, and economic inequality. Impacts within and across regions will not be distributed equally. People who are already vulnerable, including lower-income and other marginalized communities, have lower capacity to prepare for and cope with extreme weather and climate-related events and are expected to experience greater impacts. Prioritizing adaptation actions for the most vulnerable populations would contribute to a more equitable future within and across communities. Global action to significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions can substantially reduce climate-related risks and increase opportunities for these populations in the longer term."
Fourth National Climate Assessment: Summary Findings
This report is an authoritative assessment of the science of climate change, with a focus on the United States. It represents the second of two volumes of the Fourth National Climate Assessment, mandated by the Global Change Research Act of 1990.nca2018.globalchange.gov
From 2023:
"The more the planet warms, the greater the impacts. Without rapid and deep reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, the risks of accelerating sea level rise, intensifying extreme weather, and other harmful climate impacts will continue to grow. Each additional increment of warming is expected to lead to more damage and greater economic losses compared to previous increments of warming, while the risk of catastrophic or unforeseen consequences also increases. {2.3, 19.1}
However, this also means that each increment of warming that the world avoids—through actions that cut emissions or remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere—reduces the risks and harmful impacts of climate change. While there are still uncertainties about how the planet will react to rapid warming, the degree to which climate change will continue to worsen is largely in human hands. {2.3, 3.4}"
Fifth National Climate Assessment
The Fifth National Climate Assessment is the US Government’s preeminent report on climate change impacts, risks, and responses. It is a congressionally mandated interagency effort that provides the scientific foundation to support informed decision-making across the United States.