- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 67,782
- Reaction score
- 48,719
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
as is so often the situation, you failed to understand what was being presentedHe chose to post he was going around Rules lawyering service sector employees about his dog.
the DAV with a service dog attempted to inform the ignorant party who sought confirmation the DAV's animal was in fact a legitimate service dog
one which was not obligated by law to wear an indicator, the ignorant party insisted had to be worn
no surprise, you adopted the position of the person who opted to remain ignorant of the rules, and then misconveyed the circumstance