• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

City Will No Longer Jail People Who Are Too Poor To Pay Their Fines

David_N

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2015
Messages
6,562
Reaction score
2,769
Location
The United States
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
This needs to be adopted in more cities.
City Will No Longer Jail People Who Are Too Poor To Pay Their Fines | ThinkProgress
 
I like that. If they ignore the payment plan, however . . .

For those who can't afford the payment plan, they have community service and debt cancellation/reduction, from what I've read.
 
I like that. If they ignore the payment plan, however . . .

then thinkprogress will demand they simply be forgiven the debt. eventually being a burden to society will just become a form of diplomatic immunity.

personally I think they should serve really short prison sentences at a prison like in the movie "Papillion" about the former french penal colony. 10 days at that place cancels your fine in full....
 
For those who can't afford the payment plan, they have community service and debt cancellation/reduction, from what I've read.

basically as I said, diplomatic immunity for being poor. no accountability. it's like in King County where we don't jail homeless people anymore, the homeless problem has exploded, they piss on the streets, throw trash all over the place, and if you ticket them they don't come to court.

what we need is a work colony....
 
For those who can't afford the payment plan, they have community service and debt cancellation/reduction, from what I've read.

Unless someone has been adjudicated disabled or is above a certain age, I'm completely against debt cancellation.
 

I'm pretty sure "thinkprogress" doesn't have the authority to get people forgiven of their debt. Do you think it helps people when they're trapped in debt and get thrown in jail for it?
 
Unless someone has been adjudicated disabled or is above a certain age, I'm completely against debt cancellation.

I think it depends on the area.
Time will tell what kind of effect the ordinance will actually have on the town, where nearly 30 percent of the population lives below the poverty line.
 
I'm pretty sure "thinkprogress" doesn't have the authority to get people forgiven of their debt. Do you think it helps people when they're trapped in debt and get thrown in jail for it?

The purpose of the criminal justice system is not to "help you" it's to "punish" you.

I would be agreeable to debt cancellation. like I said, 10-30 days at hard labor.
 
The purpose of the criminal justice system is not to "help you" it's to "punish" you.

I would be agreeable to debt cancellation. like I said, 10-30 days at hard labor.

10-30 days hard labor would result in likely job loss which would further make this person a burden on society. It actually makes the situation worse in the long run.

I would go with community service at the pay rate of about $10 an hour towards the fine.
 
So.. community service?

on steroids. I mean shirt off in 95 degree weather digging 10 foot deep holes and felling logs with hand tools labor. the type where they'll lose 15+ pounds at least during their stay.

like I said ever seen the movie "Papillion" about people sentnenced the french penal colony in Ghana? that type of thing. not just casual picking up trash.
 
most of these people have no jobs to start with, because if they had a legitimate job you'd just garnish their wages towards the fine.
 
As long as there is a defined *and* followed plan to deal with alternatives to paying the fine, then I have no problem with this being the standard going forward.
 

That's actually pretty sick. You're essentially advocating that people risk death to do completely unnecessary forced labor.
 

Will the state be responsible for the medical care that people will require during such strenuous activity? Remember, we are a society of easy labor, bodies do not adjust to those conditions without some training.
 
most of these people have no jobs to start with, because if they had a legitimate job you'd just garnish their wages towards the fine.

Not true.
Another resident, D’Angelo Foster, said he experienced the same thing, losing his job while he spent 35 days in jail over owing $1,700.
It's a vicious cycle.
 
most of these people have no jobs to start with, because if they had a legitimate job you'd just garnish their wages towards the fine.

Wage garnishment would be acceptable for those who work. For those who don't, they have time for community service.
 

The community service in lieu of jail time seems to be a reasonable solution but simply waiving the fine does not. Perhaps the best solution would be to assign an hourly value (say the federal MW) to community service time and to allow the convicted to opt to either pay all or part of their fine in either cash or community service time. What must not be allowed to occur is for unequal treatment under the law to become seen as "fair".
 
That's actually pretty sick. You're essentially advocating that people risk death to do completely unnecessary forced labor.

everything carries small risks of death. it's not unnessecary, it's in lieu of paying fines or sitting in jail, it's a choice. just like the initial choice to break the law.
 
Will the state be responsible for the medical care that people will require during such strenuous activity?

of course. if someone's at a state facility the constitution requires adequate medical care.
 
of course. if someone's at a state facility the constitution requires adequate medical care.

The cost of the medical care is going to be more to society than the cost of the person's fine, if they fall ill, is that acceptable to you?
 

$10 per hour is way to much. Let's not forget we are talking about people who have committed a crime. At best it should be minimum wage level, I would go less than that, $5 per hour sounds good to me when you are talking about raking leaves, cutting grass and picking up trash in public areas. Make sure they are wearing bright orange jump suites too.
 

... And most crimes in this case are non-violent. Many related to drug usage.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…