iLOL :dohYou know they just threw his ass in there and he landed on his neck.
D'oh!How do you know there was probably cause. You werent there.
Again:
What a lame reply. You are engaged in an off-topic distraction.
As you were already told:
Just stop. You are arguing nonsense in regards to what is applicable here and you know it.
You want to make a constitutional argument against the City of Baltimore, or the State of Maryland take it up with them.
This topic is not about the Constitutionality of the law. Do you really not understand that?
You are engaged in a distraction, nothing more. You know it and I know it.
This topic has nothing to do with a Constitutional argument.
It has to do with City code applied to the circumstances.
In this case, an idiot won. See, you're missing the point. Unless you feel that there are no competent democrats. Are there any competent democrats?
And you are wrong again.As you were already told: The thread is about the legality of the arrest. Constitutional matters are germane to that. You want to avoid that discussion because it means either the police were wrong or the Second Amendment is wrong. You don't get to decide what is and isn't talked about.
And you are wrong again.
Figures.
Pay attention as you were already told multiple times now.
This topic has nothing to do with a Constitutional argument.
It has to do with City code applied to the circumstances.
You have been told multiple times now that you are wrong.You've been told muliple times: It has to do with the legality of the arrest and Constitutional matters enter into that. You don't get to decide what is and isn't discussed here. If you don't want to talk about that, don't, but you are not the King of the forum.
Seems like his arrest was totally illegal. The cops are using "eye contact" as proof that he needed to be detained. He stopped 2 blocks after "eye contact" was made and the cops are using that as justification that he was fleeing. Lets just admit it. They profiled him. Detained him for no reason (because he made eye contact?) and then pretended his weapon was illegal. These cops are not good honorable cops.
We still are waiting on the knife, to see if it was legal or not.
why did they stop him? Eye contact? They detained him because they made eye contact.... Then tried to justify the fact that they made eye contact and didnt get to stop him until 2 blocks away = detainment leading to arrest and tried to skew it as he was running from them, which is obvious he wasnt because he stopped. What was it that led to him being suspicious for detainment? Eye contact. A cop cant stop someone just for glancing at him and making eye contact.
If you look at a cop and he looks at you, then the cop doesnt pull you over until 5 blocks have passed. Does this count as you running from the cops because of eye contact? The victim probably knew he was being stopped for a bull**** reason, but still complied yet because he had the audacity to argue with the cops one of them decided to punish him outside of the law.
So, hypothetically even if he had a gun in his pocket... what was the reason for cops detaining him? Eye contact. That alone, to me, should lead to a voilation of constitution.
He was observed in what appeared to be a drug transaction and then ran.why did they stop him? Eye contact? They detained him because they made eye contact.... Then tried to justify the fact that they made eye contact and didnt get to stop him until 2 blocks away = detainment leading to arrest and tried to skew it as he was running from them,
Just stop.which is obvious he wasnt because he stopped.
:dohprobably knew he was being stopped for a bull**** reason,
Totally biased bs.one of them decided to punish him outside of the law.
Still got it wrong.... what was the reason for cops detaining him? Eye contact.
They did not pretend anything.and then pretended his weapon was illegal.
He's a bad guy, a career criminal, so that's why he got stopped. He's the kind of kind the police should be stopping.
Conservatives have long made it clear that they're comfortable with stopping you because of what you are. Polls have shown that conservatives are quite comfortable with profiling as long as it's not them. That's why you always get complaints from airlines passengers complaining about security scans. "BUT I'M WHITE" they always protest.You don't get stopped because of who you are or what you are.
Conservatives have long made it clear that they're comfortable with stopping you because of what you are. Polls have shown that conservatives are quite comfortable with profiling as long as it's not them. That's why you always get complaints from airlines passengers complaining about security scans. "BUT I'M WHITE" they always protest.
We still are waiting on the knife, to see if it was legal or not.
Here I disagree. You don't get stopped because of who you are or what you are. You get stopped because of what you are doing.
The knife that was found after he had been detained!!!!
Sounds like they had good instincts on this guy.
They definitely had designs on him.
Yep, well better him than someone that will never break the law or cause problems.
Why does the right loathe the constitution so, strange.
You are terribly confused.
It would appear that you are confused about who has been charged in this case and why. And how for some of us, the constitution trumps your pathetic disdain for police conduct codes, and the American rule of law, civil liberty, innocent until proven guilty and every other thing you guys hate about liberty.
It would appear that you are confused about who has been charged in this case and why. And how for some of us, the constitution trumps your pathetic disdain for police conduct codes, and the American rule of law, civil liberty, innocent until proven guilty and every other thing you guys hate about liberty.
Yeah, right! Except for the cops, right? No "innocent until proven guilty" for them, right? The prosecutor made that obvious by overcharging them and with her disgraceful remarks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?