You have a point. AFAIK, no AGW advocate has been an IBM Einstein Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study, as has Nir Shaviv.
How many times has he been on TV opposite a lawyer or politician when discussing science?
save it for those who care about denialism. i don't.
That's because your commitment is religious, not scientific.
as is the case with many of your one liners, false.
[FONT=&][FONT=&]My experience at the German Bundestag's Environment Committee in a pre-COP24 discussion[/FONT]
[/FONT]
I'm not the one avoiding the data.
At quick glance, This appears to be a panel of actual scientists who just disagree with him. Not the scenario I was putting forward.[FONT=&][FONT=&]My experience at the German Bundestag's Environment Committee in a pre-COP24 discussion[/FONT]
[/FONT]
NBC's Chuck Todd at the beginning of "Meet the Press" on Sunday said that his show is "not going to give time to climate deniers" before hosting an hourlong panel with lawmakers and experts about the consequences of climate change.
"This morning, we’re going to do something that we don’t often get to do: dive in on one topic,” Todd said after showing video clips of dramatic weather incidents in the last year. He continued that climate change is “a literally earth-changing subject that doesn’t get talked about this thoroughly, at least on television news."
...
Todd on Sunday said that his show would not not "confuse weather with climate."
The climate panel included multiple scientists and experts, as well as potential presidential contender Michael Bloomberg, climate activist California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) and Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.).
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday...his-show-is-not-going-to-give-time-to-climate
And there you have it ladies and gentlemen ... outside of college campuses you don't often get such in-your-face proud boasting about censorship ... complete with its own self-contradictions (bolded).
If Chuck Todd says "We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The earth is getting hotter and human activity is a major cause, period."
"We’re not going to give time to climate deniers,"..."The science is settled even if political opinion is not." and Bloomberg and Jerry Brown said so ... who are we to argue.
Ironic. Chuck Todd doesn't know enough about climate science to call it settled, but political opinion is what's settled for him.
At quick glance, This appears to be a panel of actual scientists who just disagree with him. Not the scenario I was putting forward.
I'm not the one avoiding the data.
Odd... because in another thread s few minutes ago, you posted a blog excerpt that basically said that if we ignore all the warming in the 21st century, there isn’t any warming.
I mean... it was literally THAT stupid.
He is appearing before the Bundestag (politicians) as are they. You asked whether he had appeared with politicians or lawyers.
Todd has no obligation to promote conspiracy theories on his show.And there you have it ladies and gentlemen ... outside of college campuses you don't often get such in-your-face proud boasting about censorship ... complete with its own self-contradictions (bolded).
Climate change deniers, apparently.If Chuck Todd says "We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The earth is getting hotter and human activity is a major cause, period."
"We’re not going to give time to climate deniers,"..."The science is settled even if political opinion is not." and Bloomberg and Jerry Brown said so ... who are we to argue.
You know this ... how? Because they said so. That ain't science.
Sorry, but your post is a lie.
Yeah but the debate was against other scientists
No. Primary questioner was [FONT="]Lorenz Beutin, MdB (Bundestag member from Die Linke - the "The Left").[/FONT]
Who was the other person answering questions.
Read the link.
There were other scientists answering questions, yes?
Yes. Others were also invited.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?