• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chuck Todd plays "Whack-A-Mole" with Jim Jordan.

Showtime586

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2020
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
11,638
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Watching Jordan constantly dodge and deflect was most amusing. If you watch his constant hyper-activity and animation, it becomes understandable why he has a 2 second attention span.

Jordan railed about "weaponizing the government". Todd showed him 4 or 5 instances, where Trump had targeted individuals. Jordan immediately deflected.

Jordan railed about Trump's home being raided and asked why wasn't Bidens home was raided. Todd smiled and said it wasn't necessary because Biden voluntarily return the documents.

There are other instances of Todd exposing Jordan's typical GOP hypocrisy, but this is a simple sampling of it. Simply a laughable appearance by Jordan.

I will say that he didn't spend his entire segment "slobbering" over Trump, so maybe there is hope for him yet.
 
Well, well. Look what our Congress has come to. We have a total raving lunatic as Chair of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Select Committee.

The interview was highly entertaining. I encourage every American to watch it. Gym Jordan at his finest.
 
On the whole, Chuck Todd is useless and a terrible interviewer.

Brennan is much better at it.
 
Jordan is not a serious person. He is of low intelligence and of high ignorance. He has no desire to govern and does not have the knowledge or skill to govern anyway.

He is putting on the act he was hired to put on.
 
On the whole, Chuck Todd is useless and a terrible interviewer.

Brennan is much better at it.
Chuck has a different style than did Russert, but he holds his own quite well.
Brennan does well too.
 
The better question is why anyone would invite Jim Jordan onto their program to spread lies and propaganda.

Not every voice needs a seat at the table of public discourse.
To expose his lies and propaganda ??
 

Jordan is what you get when people confuse the US government with the WWE.
 
Seriously?

His actions before 1/6 make it obligatory for DOJ to investigate him..

This is why he wants the details of DOJ's investigation.
Thanks. I did not understand that from your post which is why I asked you to elaborate

noonereal said:
And some may be legal, January 6th based.
 
Jim Jordan seems to have issues.
It brings up a point, not discussed in the interview (which did bounce like a basketball). What was the Constitutional authority used by the FBI to investigate the school board allegations? I'm interested as that seems like a state (local) issue.
 
It brings up a point, not discussed in the interview (which did bounce like a basketball). What was the Constitutional authority used by the FBI to investigate the school board allegations? I'm interested as that seems like a state (local) issue.
The authority to investigate terrorist threats against elected officials.
 
It brings up a point, not discussed in the interview (which did bounce like a basketball). What was the Constitutional authority used by the FBI to investigate the school board allegations? I'm interested as that seems like a state (local) issue.
domestic terrorism
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…