• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

China could defeat US in East Pacific conflict by 2020: Russian analyst

Has the U.S.A. and China just agreed to be the next major world opponents ? Just to give us something to do ?

:roll:

Now your being cynical.
 

A Chinese civil war is not inevitable, but only a fool would think it out of the question. Especially with a 2 billion population. Just like a famine, resource crisis, disease, and so on. Our own government employs people to consider such dangers for our own nation. And we do not have nearly the population. I am not saying tomorrow, but china needs to face some changes.

As for the "threat." China WILL pose a threat past the China sea. That is in their agenda. They cannot be trusted. I agree with the pentagon assessment, but I take their words with a grain of salt. They are fighting men. They are paid to consider dangers. The Soviet Union was a threat too right? Did we ever get into a shooting war? Not in the open.

The question you should be asking is not about navies. China would not be able to compete with the United States Navy. What you should ask...is would China risk nuclear war for a little bit of land? For communism? And would their people stand behind that? Would our politicians stand up against it?

It all comes down to nukes. Not ships.
 

Well sure. I would not ever place ANYTHING out of the realm of possibility. It's one thing to say China could experience revolution/civil war one day, but quite another to put it in the realm of certainty. I mean we've had both in America, point in fact, we're not doing all that well here right now and one could just as likely predict the same for here. But that's all beside the point that you fellas keep arguing against the growing threat of China's military. But your arguing with the Pentagon, not me.


And what is this that China can't be trusted. What does that mean. And how do you both agree with the Pentagons assessment and take it with a grain of salt?
 
Last edited:
China has a weapon that destroys a carrier with one shot.
 

And this is taken seriously because of Russia's rich tradition of naval power and success?:lamo
 
I don't know. It would appear you should be laughing your ass off at the Pentagon for taking it seriously. And you should arrange a meeting with the Pentagon brass to explain to them that their "serious concerns" are unfounded!
 
I don't know. It would appear you should be laughing your ass off at the Pentagon for taking it seriously. And you should arrange a meeting with the Pentagon brass to explain to them that their "serious concerns" are unfounded!

Since there's no such Pentagon statement in the OP I'll wait to hear from them.eace
 
It's in two threads this one included, but not to worry. I've arranged for them to contact you.
 
It's in two threads this one included, but not to worry. I've arranged for them to contact you.

I have no doubt the Pentagon takes China seriously, but this OP forecast US defeat, and that's well beyond the evidence.eace
 
I have no doubt the Pentagon takes China seriously, but this OP forecast US defeat, and that's well beyond the evidence.eace

Oh, there's no question it's hyperbole, that the Russian analysis goes beyond an otherwise very real threat.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…