Woman gets pregnant.
Man does not want child (no opt out in this argument).
Woman has baby anyway.
Man pays 18 years of child support.
At 18 woman is put on a Payback plan to pay the man back because of her choice to have a child he did not want. She spends the next 20 years or whatever paying him back for her choice.
She would not be eligible for any government assistance until she pays off her debt.
Child cared for.
Promotes personal responsibility.
Promotes consequences for an action.
This is a new thought for me and will evolve.
This could and should become law.
The money is not gor the parent with custody but for the offspring of the parents involved.
I support the option to opt out of paternal rights and responsibilities early in the pregnancy. But failing that, no, I do not support this payback proposal.
Fair enough. May I ask why?
Because it is child support. It is for the benefit of the kid, not the mom. If anyone should have to pay it back it should be the kid.
If you don't want to take responsibility for your actions get a vasectomy.
Woman gets pregnant.
Man does not want child (no opt out in this argument).
Woman has baby anyway.
Man pays 18 years of child support.
At 18 woman is put on a Payback plan to pay the man back because of her choice to have a child he did not want. She spends the next 20 years or whatever paying him back for her choice.
She would not be eligible for any government assistance until she pays off her debt.
Child cared for.
Promotes personal responsibility.
Promotes consequences for an action.
This is a new thought for me and will evolve.
This could and should become law.
It is *ostensibly* for the benefit of the child. The egg donor could easily spend the money on nose candy.
Woman gets pregnant.
Man does not want child (no opt out in this argument).
Woman has baby anyway.
Man pays 18 years of child support.
At 18 woman is put on a Payback plan to pay the man back because of her choice to have a child he did not want. She spends the next 20 years or whatever paying him back for her choice.
She would not be eligible for any government assistance until she pays off her debt.
Child cared for.
Promotes personal responsibility.
Promotes consequences for an action.
This is a new thought for me and will evolve.
This could and should become law.
It is certainly is relavant.Irrelevant. The money is being taken from the man forcefully against his will for her decision to not abort,.
Woman gets pregnant.
Man does not want child (no opt out in this argument).
Woman has baby anyway.
Man pays 18 years of child support.
At 18 woman is put on a Payback plan to pay the man back because of her choice to have a child he did not want. She spends the next 20 years or whatever paying him back for her choice.
She would not be eligible for any government assistance until she pays off her debt.
Child cared for.
Promotes personal responsibility.
Promotes consequences for an action.
This is a new thought for me and will evolve.
This could and should become law.
Woman gets pregnant.
Man does not want child (no opt out in this argument).
Woman has baby anyway.
Man pays 18 years of child support.
At 18 woman is put on a Payback plan to pay the man back because of her choice to have a child he did not want. She spends the next 20 years or whatever paying him back for her choice.
She would not be eligible for any government assistance until she pays off her debt.
Child cared for.
Promotes personal responsibility.
Promotes consequences for an action.
This is a new thought for me and will evolve.
This could and should become law.
I support the option to opt out of paternal rights and responsibilities early in the pregnancy. But failing that, no, I do not support this payback proposal.
Man doesn't wear condom in this scenario I am assuming. I am also assuming this is a pro-abortion argument.
Why should you be able to ditch your duty on the rest of society.
You had a chance to opt out.
You didn't take it.
Neither did the woman. If the woman doesn’t want to foot the bill then she too can abdicate her rights and responsibilities.
Nope. Once the deed is done it is too late.
You should have opted out before or taken better precautions.
Which is why both parents are expected to support said child.
Nope. You got several months after the deed is done before it is too late.
Because it is child support. It is for the benefit of the kid, not the mom. If anyone should have to pay it back it should be the kid.
If you don't want to take responsibility for your actions get a vasectomy.
No way! The man is just as culpable as the women in creating a child.
Besides, it requires more than just money to rear a child.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?