GarzaUK said:This coming from the guy that says the insurgenct was in it's "last throes" half a year ago? That the Iraq war would takes weeks not months? Whose right hand man is being indicted?
Ahem :roll:
aps said:Yup. The man is a liar.
KCConservative said:What makes him a liar? It is how he feels about the situation. I swear, you guys are so desperate to regain an ounce of political power, you throw the "liar" word around every day. I agree with him. The distortion and attacks by the left are reprehensible. But you see, that doesn't make me a liar. It makes be opinionated. But then again, I also believe the American people are smart enough to demand evidence. Until they get it, you're spinning your liberal wheels.
aps said:Yeah yeah yeah--we've heard it all. The Bushies think that the senators/congress people questioning the intelligence are "irresponsible," "disingenuous," and now "reprehensible."
But as correctly pointed out by John Kerry: "It is hard to name a government official with less credibility on Iraq than Vice President Cheney."
LMAO :clap:
GySgt said:Let's see what else was "correctly pointed out" about credibility by John Kerry....
“A brutal, oppressive dictator, guilty of personally murdering and condoning murder and torture, grotesque violence against women, execution of political opponents, a war criminal who used chemical weapons against another nation and, of course, as we know, against his own people, the Kurds. He has diverted funds from the Oil-for-Food program, intended by the international community to go to his own people. He has supported and harbored terrorist groups, particularly radical Palestinian groups such as Abu Nidal, and he has given money to families of suicide murderers in Israel.
I mention these not because they are a cause to go to war in and of themselves, as the President previously suggested, but because they tell a lot about the threat of the weapons of mass destruction and the nature of this man. We should not go to war because these things are in his past, but we should be prepared to go to war because of what they tell us about the future.”
(TEXT FROM THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY MADE ON THE SENATE FLOOR October 9, 2002)
http://www.independentsforkerry.org/...erry-iraq.html
Or is "correctly pointed out" only correct when you can use it?
LMAO :clap: :roll: :bravo:
Inuyasha said:By that logic we should be at war with North Korea, Iran, Packistan and a host of African countries.
GySgt said:Let's see what else was "correctly pointed out" about credibility by John Kerry....
“A brutal, oppressive dictator, guilty of personally murdering and condoning murder and torture, grotesque violence against women, execution of political opponents, a war criminal who used chemical weapons against another nation and, of course, as we know, against his own people, the Kurds. He has diverted funds from the Oil-for-Food program, intended by the international community to go to his own people. He has supported and harbored terrorist groups, particularly radical Palestinian groups such as Abu Nidal, and he has given money to families of suicide murderers in Israel.
I mention these not because they are a cause to go to war in and of themselves, as the President previously suggested, but because they tell a lot about the threat of the weapons of mass destruction and the nature of this man. We should not go to war because these things are in his past, but we should be prepared to go to war because of what they tell us about the future.”
(TEXT FROM THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY MADE ON THE SENATE FLOOR October 9, 2002)
http://www.independentsforkerry.org/...erry-iraq.html
Or is "correctly pointed out" only correct when you can use it?
LMAO :clap: :roll: :bravo:
GySgt said:Let's see what else was "correctly pointed out" about credibility by John Kerry....
Inuyasha said:By that logic we should be at war with North Korea, Iran, Packistan and a host of African countries. The US is not the world's policeman and 95% of this country will agree. If we were to fight a war with every dicator on the planet who abuses his own people and promotes any kund of terrorism. we would be at war constantly and have to enlarge our military 10 fold.
We need the military on OUR borders not on the borders of some foreign country. We need to take care of OUR people. Some of whom are still homeless after the hurricane season not to mention other problems that need our government's immediate attention. Best to follow the advice of the father of our nation when he said "Beware of foreign entanglements."
Lucidthots said:Kerry & Bush are part of the same cult:
http://defconmen.com/educate/skull_and_bones-kerry.wmv
aps said:So what? Cheney presented facts as though there was no evidence to the contrary, when there was. That is dishonest.
I quoted Kerry because it is exactly how I feel....and I never claimed that there were WMDs.
GySgt said:Careful. Your posts have already been "Canuck-ish." I'd hate to see you get banned for spamming. Though it would be hillarious at first, it would soon turn tragic, because I know we are all you got.
GySgt said:No, you arbitrarily choose to quote who ever supports your emotions and you chose Kerry, because he is against Bush and you wanted some political support to bash. But by doing that, you also chose to quote an individual who is extremely contradictory to what he believes from time to time.
GySgt said:Both of you have changed your avatars and either way, you have been blown out of the water and exposed to be a fraud.
aps said:You're obnoxious GySgt. I was watching the news yesterday morning and they replayed Cheney's "reprehensible" comment. They then quoted some of what Reid said and that one-liner by Kerry. I laughed out loud. It was that particular piece of news that made me start this thread. I actually did a search on google to find the exact wording that Kerry used.
If anyone made that commentary, I would have quoted them.
Why you think you can tell me how I feel is beyond me, particularly when you don't even know me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?