• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Changing Attitudes On Veterans Day


You do know this isn't the CT section of this forum right?

And that is where your garbage belongs.
 
The young naked girl wasn't walking away from My Lai, she was walking away from a napalm attack that occurred years later.


You're correct. Revisionist history lies are always skewed as proven by HumblePi's post.
 
You do know this isn't the CT section of this forum right?

And that is where your garbage belongs.

Wrong!

HumblePi has a point that every war hawk should listen too.

I was in Somalia............for what?

I was in Liberia............just to watch them kill themselves?

I was off the coast of El Salvador dropping SEALS....................for what?

Many of my young friends here in Hampton Roads went to Afghanistan and Iraq and a few of them came back quite ****ed up.....................for what?


BIG WHOOP............ I had a couple feel good moments in Grenada and Panama.
 
In '92 we could have elected George H. W. Bush, a veteran, for a second term instead of draft-dodging Bill Clinton. In the last election, the Republican party could have nominated someone other than Trump, who also dodged the draft. Put someone in our highest office who respects the military and maybe there won't be a change in attitude on Veterans Day.


 

Yeah? I was TDY in Grenada for 6 months 1983-84. I very seldom run into anyone else who was there.
 

I was there too.

The tens of thousands we helped feed think it was a good thing.
 

Is always funny how the left didn't care about military service at for presidents while both Clinton and Obama were in office but with Trump it's a huge issue. Wonder what caused the change of heart
 
Is always funny how the left didn't care about military service at for presidents while both Clinton and Obama were in office but with Trump it's a huge issue. Wonder what caused the change of heart

In '92 we could have elected George H. W. Bush, a veteran, for a second term instead of draft-dodging Bill Clinton. In the last election, the Republican party could have nominated someone other than Trump, who also dodged the draft. Put someone in our highest office who respects the military and maybe there won't be a change in attitude on Veterans Day.
 
Yeah? I was TDY in Grenada for 6 months 1983-84. I very seldom run into anyone else who was there.

Ground support (generators) for a week during the invasion.

I flew back to Atlantic Fleet Weapons Training Facility in Roosevelt Roads afterwards.
 
Ground support (generators) for a week during the invasion.

I flew back to Atlantic Fleet Weapons Training Facility in Roosevelt Roads afterwards.

I was helping equip and train the Caribbean Peacekeeping Force. We had a Navy guy with our team. He did admin stuff in the office with the Col., CW3, and SGM. Our team stayed in the Calabash Hotel on Lance aux Epines beach. Had been a 5 star hotel (and would be again) but was a little run down at the time. Still very nice though. Old fashion laid back beach living. Open air bar and dining. Jim Brown stayed there a couple nights and we got to meet him. We got the Embassy rate which was about 140 a day. That would equate to around 350 in 2019 dollars. All on the taxpayer dime though. No complaints from me.
 

Not really.

Part of the reasons Americans fetishize the military is because it is such an uncommon thing. Compare how Americans view our military today versus how the Russians or Israelis (or any country that has conscription) view their armed forces and the difference is palpable. Countries where everyone serves doesn't increase respect for the military. It makes it far more common and less of an anomaly.
 
The Swiftboat veterans cast the first stone. I assume that's where Trump got the gall to belittle a Goldstar family and ridicule McCain for having been a POW. Conservatives must like ridiculing vets because they keep voting for people that do it.

Trump's buffoonery aside......

I served with Engineman and Boatswain mate's Swift Boat veterans in the 1970's who were there in Vietnam in the very same squadron as Kerry. There are still 2 Swift Boat veterans (coxswain & engineman) that I have golfed with for 35 years.

They all say the same thing about Kerry's arrogance and incompetence.

3 Purple Heart's and never missed a day of duty?

Damn, he's a tough SOB! :shock:
 
The willingness of the Western world to engage on the other side of the globe was a win.

Ecofarm:

Not for the other side of the globe, it wasn't. It was a net loss. And what a lovely euphemism you use by calling wars of imperialism and adventure by the benign phrase, "to engage". These were not engagements, they were shotgun and howitzer weddings where the weapons were used on the brutalised brides repeatedly until they were broken and dragged to the alter of imperial capitalism and colonialism. This engagement was done in order to turn four-fifths of the world into the chattel of the other fifth. And it's still happening today.

Veterans should be celebrated for their courage and their service to their states but that does not mean that their political and military leaders who sent them "to engage" had noble or altruistic intents in sending them to war. Veterans should take up the mantle of serving as the guardians of peace and the conscience of the state when they put down their weapons, put aside their uniforms and make a civilian's life while they struggle with their memories of the atrocity of war. Veterans should be the first line of defence against ideologically-driven, greedy or myopic politicians and vainglorious militarists who would lightly plunge the state into wars of choice and unleash the horrors of war on their fellow citizens and those of other states. Those are some of the domestic enemies which veterans should lead their fellow citizens to confront and defeat politically before shots are fired abroad. Starting wars of choice should be very, very hard for those in power to do and so a citizen army, perhaps with a professional cadre for training, is a wiser strategy for peace than an all professional, all volunteer army, or worse still a mercenary army as per Erik Prince's desires, which can frequently wage war without undue political cost. War should never be easy to start.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
Last edited:

One of the things I've experienced during my 18 years of service and counting is that both left and right, except for the extremes on either end, actually do respect veterans and treat us quite well. Honestly, I find it slightly embarrassing sometimes when I have to do something while still in uniform and people thank me for my service as I don't feel like I've sacrificed nearly as much as many. It is still heartening to see gratitude though.

I'm glad that people seem to heave learned to separate Soldiers being used by the government for questionable wars and their sacrifices and service. We still a strong military for our security, even if it gets misused. It's the citizens' duty to vote in people who do not use it inappropriately or to put pressure on to stop them if they do.
 

"The term swiftboating (also swift-boating or swift boating) is a pejorative American neologism used to describe an unfair or untrue political attack."


You must be so proud to know such liars that give all swift boat veterans a bad name.
 

Some people believe the Vietnam War was vital to world development as it established the West's willingness to engage the other side of the globe.

No amount of BS or misconception on your part will change that.
 
"The term swiftboating (also swift-boating or swift boating) is a pejorative American neologism used to describe an unfair or untrue political attack."


You must be so proud to know such liars that give all swift boat veterans a bad name.

You are totally ignorant on what Kerry did to earn that reputation.

And, you have no idea about the character of the of these SB veterans, so you just take the typical air head route and go with your party's parroting.

So typical of you to spout off your ignorance and just follow your party line BS.
 

I'm not impressed with your opinions.
 
Some people believe the Vietnam War was vital to world development as it established the West's willingness to engage the other side of the globe.

No amount of BS or misconception on your part will change that.

Can you expand your statement?
 
Not opinions............your words were.

You are the same ****ing air head that you have always been.

I know you are but what am I. :roll:
 
“The West” should have embraced Uncle Ho in 1945, imo.

Democracy and Western values became global influences, however unclear the local arena. Vietnam was, in some way, the birth of globalism.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…