H. Lee White
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,907
- Reaction score
- 1,014
- Location
- The great lakes
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
As I am sure you have noticed, you were asked to present a rational, objctive argument to support what you believe "should" be - and you have, as yet, completely failed to do so.Interesting how you cannot counter any of my statements....
So, my statement remains.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1061162225 said:I was wondering when "it's Bush's fault" would show up. Sure enough, in the first liberal post to the thread.
Says he who cannot back up his position of what "should" be with an objective argument, thusly garnering support only from the unthinking among us.The only thing that remains is your failure, your incompetence and the corporate chains that encircle your slave ridden limbs
I know. Everything he did vanishes the minute he leaves office. As as Obama goes, nothing he did will matter. I get it.
However, I didn't say Bush. So, your silliness is just that. Silliness.
People knew the number of people on welfare is rising under the current administration and voted for that status quo direction to continue. The "will of the people."
Says he who cannot back up his position of what "should" be with an objective argument, thusly garnering support only from the unthinking among us.
Agreed, sadly. Like Maggie Thatcher observed, it works fine until you run out of other people's money.
Agreed, sadly. Like Maggie Thatcher observed, it works fine until you run out of other people's money.
You're the one that knows he cannot objectively support his opinion, and that only the similarly unthinking will be persuaded by same.You're the one with the guns in your signature....
You're the one that knows he cannot objectively support his opinion, and that only the similarly unthinking will be persuaded by same.
This issue at hand is your ooinion of what "should" be, an opinion that you recognize you cannot back up w/ any objective argument....again you refuse to tackle the issue in hand
Provide for the common defense.Blame it on Obama again? The United States Army is developing a weapon that can reach and destroy any location on earth withing an hour and now you have 50 million americans struggling to survive?
Provide for the common defense.
Promote the general welfare.
Provide and promote do not mean the same thing.
Your intentional intellectual dishonesty is of no interest to me or any other thinking person.Have you ever bothered to read this thing?
Your intentional intellectual dishonesty is of no interest to me or any other thinking person.
I'm sorry.
Actually, adjusted for inflation and cost of living changes over the years, the poverty level mimics the first thresholds released in '63 and '64."Poverty" doesn't mean what it used to mean. To be impoverished for a family of 4, means less than $22,800.00.
Although certainly not wealthy living, to be in "poverty" in the United States, is an income over 300% higher than the average income for nearly 80% of the countries of the world and three times the average income in the world - with that including calculating the wealthiest countries. Our "poor people" are on average 300% better off than over 75% of the people of the world.
It also is notable that what the federal government defines as being in poverty in terms of benefits is HIGHER than the census counts as poverty by 130%.
and of course the banksters never seem to run out of money - and when they stuff up everything with their fascist corporate greed they run to the State for bail outs and subsidies
Interesting how you demand market discipline and rational economics for the state and tax payers, but socialistic corporate welfare and artificial protectionism for the elite unaccountable unelectable Plutocratic fascists that enslave you into your cell of delusional freedom.
Their propaganda is so effective and relentless that you cannot even see the chains that encircle your limbs.
You may want to quote Goerge Orwell rather than the Iron Maiden
(I also notice that you refuse to quote Maggie Thatcher's views on global warming - you are aware that Maggie held a Chemistry degree and warned the world as early as the late 1980s that human induced global warming effects are the biggest threat to human civilisation? I suppose you pick and choose what fascist remarks you wish to publicise - isnt that correct Mr Diogenes - a nick name that has ancient Hellenic integrity - why are you using it in public?)
One should never apologise for an obvious handicap
This is actually the fault of the unions.
They have forced us to send American jobs to China as fast as we can.
Blue collar Americans are overpaid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?