• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cato (a right leaning libertarian think tank) provides an extremely honest evaluation of political violence

I'm not making excuses at all. Only showing the lack of evidence the story has. I do this because you lefties do not realize just how frequently you are being lied to. You guys constantly run with lies as fact, without the intelligence to make sure you are not making fools of yourselves. I get a laugh out of this stuff. I tell you guys how you are wrong, nobody has enough sense to verify, and continue on with the lies.

You guys are hilarious.

Go ahead. Find the information I say is missing. prove me wrong.
If you bothered to read the OP's link, in your search for evidence, you would have noticed the author's link to the sources he used for his entry. I assume you missed it, a quite lengthy article also published by the CATO Institute, which I am sure verified its accuracy before publishing.

Is it really that difficult to recognize that Trump, as usual, is lying about who is responsible for political violence?
 
It’s not that it’s effective, it’s the target audience that’s gullible.

It has been very profitable to make people more gullible and enhance group think. For example how tobacco and fossil fuel for many decades eroded the trust in facts and science so they could continue to sell their products. To how Murdoch built a global media empire on lies and division.


 
You have no concept of original sourcing. Where is the root source of that data? Is that is all it ism there is not clear indication how the author determines left and right.

This is meaningless outside of opinion.

He linked to a March article early in the OP's link, but without having read the entire massive report, that appears to only reference foreign-born terrorism.
 
It's important that leaders set positive examples like
Gabriel Boric, the president of Chile. Instead of advocating for violence and hate like Trump.




There Chile along with other countries now form a coalition to defend and strengthen democracy.

 
Back
Top Bottom