• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cancerous molar pregnancy and can't get abortion in Oklahoma?

why any woman would vote for republicans is beyond me. and not only because of herself but because of other women.
 
You understand nothing
You see nothing
Spin again.
You are the first person I have ever seen us an appeal to utter bullshit fallacy.

Well, except for EMN.
 
A couple years ago I had to leave the state to get my apendix removed and get in-patient dialysis for a few weeks. Not cancer but still life threatening. I imagin that if I had cancer and needed to drive an houre across a state line to have it removed, that I would just do that and be done with it.
Why did you need to cross state lines to get your appendix out?
 
Why did you need to cross state lines to get your appendix out?
The appendix rupture shut down my kidneys and I would need in-patient dialysis immediately following the operation. My local hospital did not perform in-patient dialysis and the next nearest hospital that could do it was about an hour away across the state line, so that's where they took me. My sister once had to cross the country to get a life-saving operation. My point is that while OK restrictions should be lifted, in the meantime traveling to get a procedure isn't the end of the world, lots of people do it every day.

If anyone has a link to a charity that helps women travel for medical procedures, I would be happy to donate.
 
I will say this again.

Anybody that thinks a woman with a cancerous pregnancy should wait for treatment until she is showing critical signs..............

Should wait for treatment of their own cancer (all forms) until you show critical signs. It is just that simple.

Early treatment of cancer is crucial. Catch it before it causes serious harm or spreads to other places in the body.

This whole thread is a WTH moment for me.
 
I will say this again.

Anybody that thinks a woman with a cancerous pregnancy should wait for treatment until she is showing critical signs..............

Should wait for treatment of their own cancer (all forms) until you show critical signs. It is just that simple.

Early treatment of cancer is crucial. Catch it before it causes serious harm or spreads to other places in the body.

This whole thread is a WTH moment for me.
Yep. Here is where we see very clearly that the anti choicers are typically not actually prolife. They are just anti choice. Because Jebus and heaven.
 
Image
 
"I was trying not to die. I was so out of it. I was hearing the words, but nothing was sticking. I just remember looking over at my husband and his head was in his hands and he was crying, 'Why won't they help you?'" He asked to speak to the ethics board at the hospital but his request was denied."
 
why any woman would vote for republicans is beyond me. and not only because of herself but because of other women.
A lot of women don't care about other women at all.
 
It’s just another moron looking for their 15 minutes of fame.
They need to STFU and solve the problem on their own instead of crying on the Internet.
Wish rape on somebody else you sicko.
It's too late for that woman, but for others the solution is to refuse to date or marry men until they move to states where abortion is legal. Idaho, Texas, etc., can become all male states.
 
Back
Top Bottom