Good for them.At the site you can link to a detailed letter to all members of Parliament. Does anyone realize this is going on?
You are being redirected...
Well it doesn't describe me. And it doesn't describe Trump. Does it describe you?
Racist blogs tend to cherry pick stats to confirm their confirmation bias.
The violence in Islam will go the same of violence in other religions have in the past. Through education and capitalism. Religious extremism diminishes when Abdul has something to actually lose.
They'll remain that way for as long as they live in constant poverty and warlordism.
It's hard to be civil when I'm taught to oppose people who wish to change the moral fabric of the country I swore to defend.
You sure used a lot of big words to say you've accused someone of using an Ad Hom fallacy there, sport.
To which you later resort to using an ad hom yourself instead of trying to answer the question of how discriminating against a religion will somehow protect us from that religion.
That does not happen in European countries. From which racist site did you get that gem of information?
Published in December 2004, her report recommended (pdf) that the "Arbitration Act should continue to allow disputes to be arbitrated using religious law."
She, no doubt, realised it would not be possible to allow Christian and Jewish tribunals to continue but ban Muslim ones.
Faisal Kutty, writing in the New Catholic Times, supported the report's findings.
"Sharia is not coming to Canada and there will be no sharia courts. Muslims simply wish to use Islamic principles to resolve their disputes within the Canadian legal system"
https://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2008/feb/08/sharialawincanadaalmost
I am,you should try it.
Anyone in the Alt-Right who thinks that The massive demographic change which is going on right now and will hit full force before the end of this century won't change the USA and the GOP tremendously is living in an out of touch dream world.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
:lol:
We are not talking about the alt right. We are discussing Canada a kiss away from losing what free speech it has to placate Islam. And you have not been honest about the wide support for Sharia and violence to advance Islam.
You still have not provided any evidence of this.
I would think the letter itself would be evidence. Why write it except for concerns this could happen?
Because they are white supremacists and that is what they do, they fear-monger. There is no talk about this, there is no bill, there is no evidence this is happening.
Here we go again. It has nothing to do with race. Do you think Hindus and Buddhists are white? This is about caving to an ideology masked as a religion and is taking extreme advantage of that fact.
is what I said.
Except you have provided no evidence this is happening. They want to stir fear of Muslims, by lying. I think you would be more at home on StormFront.
I said before the letter is evidence enough. You will realize where the hate comes from eventually. Let's hope it is not too late.
Right. You said Canada would adopt Sharia laws about speech that was offensive to Islam. That's blasphemy laws. There's slightly different versions out there. Do we use the Shi-ite version from Iran or the Sunni from Saudi Arabia for our definition?
We are not talking about the alt right. We are discussing Canada a kiss away from losing what free speech it has to placate Islam. And you have not been honest about the wide support for Sharia and violence to advance Islam.
How is it evidence enough? If I write about something in letter do you instantly believe it?
Quebec Law Would Stifle Criticism of Radical Islam
I wonder why?The leaders of Canada's political parties have so far kept mum on Bill 59.
Bill 59 will permit Muslims to make complaints to the Quebec Human Rights Commission (QHRC) against anyone critiquing Islam or Islamism, triggering lawsuits for hate speech.
I don't believe that Canada will give up free speech to placate Islam any sooner than the USA will give up the 1st Amendment to placate the far-right evangelicals.
Wait and see.
"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch,running out of time,GOP.
We are talking about restricting speech that offends Islam, which is certainly part of Sharia. I think you better brush up on Sharia.
Your predictions aren't exactly written in stone.
I wonder why?
So you can see it is happening but not getting much attention.
From 2015 Quebec Law Would Stifle Criticism of Radical Islam :: Middle East Forum
Care to provide the actual wording of the bill? You know actual evidence. Also there is no way that law would still be on the table.
Do a little research and read some of Trump's recorded statements.
He's not just bigoted against Muslims, he has also shown bigotry towards Mexicans.
Eventually he will pay a price for his bigotry.
Wait and see.
Senseless examples. First if you lose 90% of your goods ya can damn well bet it was more than green people! And WTF is green people??? are 90% of the murders committed by Muslims? What percent of robberies??? No silly almost to the point of ignorance an example...green people indeed...
So is fear of the dark but when I was a grunt we owned the night. So is fearing thunder but unless you are dumb enough to play golf in a storm or stand under the lone tree...
Yeah we do incredibly stupid things for no damned good reason...like it or no... but that is no reason to just shrug and accept ignorance bigotry and hate running our policies...eace
I have followed all that very closely and I have an excellent bull**** meter to judge what is being fairly reported and what is not. In my opinion, Trump doesn't have a racist bone in his body and he has NEVER shown any bigotry toward anybody.
He does, however, tell it exactly what it is. Most of the illegals coming across the southern border are Mexicans. That is a fact, and it is not bigotry toward Mexicans that makes it a fact. Most of the terrorism being committed here and and around the world is committed by Muslims. That is a fact, and it is not bigotry toward Muslims that makes it a fact.
Trump is guilty of honesty in the form of political incorrectness, a cardinal and mortal sin in the eyes of progressives. But that is all he is guilty of.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?