- Joined
- Feb 22, 2019
- Messages
- 42,491
- Reaction score
- 29,633
- Location
- The Bay
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I can't help with what you take from the post if you don't understand it.It's what I get from your post. You back it up.
I have not offered any opinions.Don't let facts get in the way of your opinion
True. Not relevant to anything I’ve posted though.. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has them.
Since this isn't a fact...it's an opinion.I have not offered any opinions.
True. Not relevant to anything I’ve posted though.
You don't have a clue about what this thread is about.
Enumerate the lie you claim I've made or stfu.
It is a fact. We know this empirically.Since this isn't a fact...it's an opinion.
"Firearms are completely irrelevant to suicide rates."
I’m standing over the grave site your position is buried inYou should put away the shovel and climb out of the hole you are digging.
So now you're not concerned with all firearms deaths, just those at a certain age?I can't help with what you take from the post if you don't understand it.
Do you understand what is meant by 'age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths' mean?
You can't legislate away due process.Legislation is the first step in due process.
Yeah it's basically saying I'm going to use these stipulations to manipulate the statistics to make it sound really bad.I can't help with what you take from the post if you don't understand it.
Do you understand what is meant by 'age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths' mean?
So, you've got nothing.
Oh...I know exactly what YOU are about...and so does everyone else.
And you know it.
Then why do you have so much trouble providing anything to back up your facts?It is a fact. We know this empirically.
I’m standing over the grave site your position is buried in
I don’t. If you are new to the gun debate forum, you need to educate yourself on the failed and debunked arguments of your predecessors.Then why do you have so much trouble providing anything to back up your facts?
Facts don’t care about your feelings.I'm going with operator error.
For Christ's sake. Can you tell me you don't know what it means without telling me you don't know what it means?So now you're not concerned with all firearms deaths, just those at a certain age?
Your focus should be, as mine is, to enforce current firearms laws to their fullest extent.
Write your congress critters, your county reps, and your city reps your DAs.
I send examples for killers who had been let off or a light slap on firearms charges previously.
You are not accomplishing anything on this forum.
Can you read?You can't legislate away due process.
Do you put any thoughts into your posts?Yeah it's basically saying I'm going to use these stipulations to manipulate the statistics to make it sound really bad.
Your words? blah, blah, blahI don’t. If you are new to the gun debate forum, you need to educate yourself on the failed and debunked arguments of your predecessors.
Facts don’t care about your feelings.
For Christ's sake. Can you tell me you don't know what it means without telling me you don't know what it means?
If incarceration made us safer we wouldn't be having these conversations.
We'd be safer by preventing the weapons from getting into his hands in the first place. If incarceration made us safer, we'd already be safe.Are we safer when a mass murderer is removed from society as compared to if he is at liberty to accomplish his murderous whims?
Your statement is nonsensical.
Crime data, not words.Your words? blah, blah, blah
This has been done in several dozen threads. If you don’t know the basics, you need to refrain from posting.Show me something or admit you're just making shite up.
I'll just go with too lazy or just not telling the truth.Crime data, not words.
This has been done in several dozen threads. If you don’t know the basics, you need to refrain from posting.
We'd be safer by preventing the weapons from getting into his hands in the first place. If incarceration made us safer, we'd already be safe.
View attachment 67576967
I don’t care what you go with, but you remain factually incorrect.I'll just go with too lazy or just not telling the truth.
This has been done in several dozen threads. If you don’t know the basics, you need to stop posting on the subject.Source the data, and if you don't know how, just ask, I'll show you. Teachers teach everyone.
Yeah I'm not manipulated by misrepresentations in statistics.Do you put any thoughts into your posts?
Can you?Can you read?
Point out the misrepresentation. Try to use a complete sentence.Yeah I'm not manipulated by misrepresentations in statistics.
Yes. I completely understand what "Legislation is the first step in due process" means. Can you explain what your response "You can't legislate away due process" means?Can you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?