- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
That doesn't work when you smell like pot.
I'm actually not thinking about cops pulling people over, I'm thinking about cops using pot smoke as a reason to detain kids on the corner.
Oh reduced to personal attacks. FAIL
I say over and over again it should be legal. Put down the bong and pay attention.
sure is. I already stated I don't drink like some smoke. "short term"....
And I agreed that it should be handled like alcohol, short term issues hautey? :lol:
Personal attacks.
What is your point? Do you even remember it
Irrellevant
Where did I say weed smokers bad? I said chronic weed smokers are dirtbags like drunks.
I am neither. My liver is perfect. Thank you for your concern.
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
always been..... though this liver is prolly useless....
is it useless or was it a "funny" please concentrate on your attacks please. Your utter failure is rather humorous given your divergent points about me.
I can not comment due to the VEGAS rule.
More personal attacks. Please exhibit a modicum of self control. thank you.
:lol: is it useless or was it a "funny" please concentrate on your attacks please.
Don't smell like pot?
Wow. Your inconsistency is cute :
And yet your liver is useless.Do you want to try and run that by the logic factory once again? Maybe it'll make more sense the second time around.
Cry baby cry baby.
Seriously. Consistency is NOT your forte.
Of course it's VERY relevant. Substance you can directly die from consuming too much of. Legal. Illegal substance you can not directly die from. Illegal. Use a bit of logic son. Seriously you're making this too easy.
How many non-drunks do you know that have ruined livers due to drinking? Denial much?
[
:rofl It's fun to watch you and your FAIL seizures. You seem to take pride and fun in your ruined liver even though it's useless. Reverend. Seriously. You're stepping up to the wrong intellectual on this forum.
Well thankfully for me I'm not dumb enough to talk about ruined livers upstairs.
Wow. Are you seriously this inconsistent in real life? Or is it once you have to write down your ideas that you're inconsistent? I'm really curious. I mean you seem to lack all sense of coherence after a while and can't wait to snap. I mean it's almost cute. Like a 7 year old screaming Ha-ha even though you haven't said anything relevant in a few posts.
Well, here's the thing, in the summer in some neighborhoods everyone does, so the cops are clearly enforcing the law arbitrarily so they can pick up anyone they think looks "suspicious".
1. The difference between my conclusion and your conclusion is you are trying to act as though my conclusion should lead to yours. The video proves that being moderately high can allow a person who is a regular smoker of marijuana the ability to concentrate better.
When the driver was not high, he could drive and focus on everything else which was because he could pay less attention to the road and still drive ok. When the driver was high, his perception was distorted, not so much to not allow him to do normal tasks but enough that he had to focus himself on a task at hand to get it done.
When high you have to concentrate, which is something people who have a hard time concentrating cannot do on there own, with moderate use of marijuana this is possible. People have to focus on the task at hand, in order to get things done. There is no multitasking involved.
2. You brought up the fact of smoking being bad for your lungs or what not because it is cancerous. I bring up butter because it is not nearly as cancerous form of ingestion as smoking and offers the same effects. Neutralizing your argument of cancer.
Don't smell like pot?
So i can hypothetically be harassed for wearing a scent (cologne/incense) that "someone" perceives as pot?!?!
Ill be going back to Cali this summer to stock up on cannabis enriched food.
Wear your underwear outside your tights too. Otherwise I'll just think your a flamboyant vampire. :lol:
No, the difference between your conclusion is mine is that you are making apologies for someone who is driving while impaired and I am not.
In bold. He said it. You said it. Yet you dismiss it. This is the problem with many pro-legals. HIS PERCEPTION WAS DISTORTED. I do not want him on the road. Same as someone who drinks who's perception is distorted.
You are making a great case for me to alter my position from being pro-legal. When some of you give this type of erroneous information, like saying it is OK for someone with a distorted perception to drive, you make it sound like all you want is your weed. It makes your position very weak, and makes people who are on the cusp reject that position.
No, you have to force yourself to concentrate because your perception is distorted. If you can do that under those conditions, you can do it better when your perception is not distorted.
And driving involves a lot of multitasking. If you are saying that multi-tasking is diminished, that's yet another reason why someone who has smoked should not drive.
Please point out the post where I mentioned smoking and cancer.
1. I was only showing how you can smoke marijuana and still focus, something you got wrong. I am not condoning smoking while or before you drive, just like the video does not promote it. Those were not true driving situations, those were simple tasks to perform, and the video showed how marijuana can be used positively for focusing on simple tasks.
2. You mentions how smoking it is detrimental to your health did you not, and I contradicted that fact by pointing out you do not have to smoke it.
I agree that it is wrong. But given the legal LEO world we live in, does it make it smart?
Although ingesting it in other ways is much safer, similar to heavy alcohol use, heavy marijuana use will cause some of these other health effects.
I would like to know these perceived health risks. Care to elaborate?
seriously just conduct some primary research. get a case of beer and see what you do and how you feel afterwards.
get an eighth and do the same.
You have to think about this though.
Would you rather have legal marijuana sold by convenience stores or violent gangs and cartels based on marijuana distributorship and sales?
With the exception of the health concerns brought on by smoking anything, all others still apply. Increased heart problems, increased psychiatric problems, suppressing the immune system, and memory issues can occur regardless of how the substance is ingested.
Do you honestly think that by legalizing marijuana the drug cartels will be out of business?
Good lord; new argument to legalize drugs: Government get's revenue. :rofl
the standard that weed should be held to is liquor.
so the burden is to prove that weed is worse for you then liquor.
I absolutely believe that weed is completely less harmful then liquor.
It is well documented that black markets restrict discrete supply, and therefore keeps the pricing mechanism in the fashion of an exverted supply curve and an exverted demand curve. Therefore the situations of quantity surpluses will fail to reduce price at almost all levels.
To sum it up, these are super windfall profits for the high risk, high reward illicit drug business.
LOL, i guess it all depends on what "worse" is. In the minds of many, because it is illegal, it is therefore worse!:lol:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?