- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,908
- Reaction score
- 489
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Most people point out the problems in other people's beliefs while accepting theirs as the truth. However, there are many unsolved questions which poke holes in many beliefs:
Creationists:
How did life get to Australia if there was a worldwide flood?
If the universe is only thousands of years old, how come we can see billions of light years away?
(Christianity) Why weren't Jesus's miracles recorded by the romans?
(Islam) if Jesus was just a prophet, why is there a religion centered around him?
Evolutionists:
What caused the big bang?
I understand how bacteria evolved into complex life but how did life really begin?
If aliens are out there, why haven't we found them yet (fermi paradox)?
How did complex life survive before they evolved an immune system?
How does a mars like planet (the one which crashed into earth to form the moon) form in earth's orbit without crashing into the earth?
This is not an attack on any belief, this is just something to think about.
The answer to your question is no
Most people point out the problems in other people's beliefs while accepting theirs as the truth. However, there are many unsolved questions which poke holes in many beliefs:
Creationists:
How did life get to Australia if there was a worldwide flood?
If the universe is only thousands of years old, how come we can see billions of light years away?
(Christianity) Why weren't Jesus's miracles recorded by the romans?
(Islam) if Jesus was just a prophet, why is there a religion centered around him?
Evolutionists:
What caused the big bang?
I understand how bacteria evolved into complex life but how did life really begin?
If aliens are out there, why haven't we found them yet (fermi paradox)?
How did complex life survive before they evolved an immune system?
How does a mars like planet (the one which crashed into earth to form the moon) form in earth's orbit without crashing into the earth?
This is not an attack on any belief, this is just something to think about.
No and I'd bet an order of Chicken McNuggets we never will.
My take on this question is a mix of both creationist and evolutionist. I believe that creationists are right about a higher power creating the universe, the reason being because we still don't have a 100% flawless theory on the reasons for the cause of the big bang, this leads me to believe that the higher power caused the Big Bang. However, after that evolutionists have the right idea. I believe the higher power didn't want to directly influence so early on its creation, so he let evolution take its course, thus leading in the creation of man through evolution. When man comes to be, that is when the higher power comes back to influence the world and gives the first human to evolve a name, Adam and he makes it so that the next human to evolve is a female and names her Eve. Adam is given the task by the higher power to name the creatures. and the rest is self explanatory. This is my take on your question.
Most people point out the problems in other people's beliefs while accepting theirs as the truth. However, there are many unsolved questions which poke holes in many beliefs:
Creationists:
How did life get to Australia if there was a worldwide flood?
If the universe is only thousands of years old, how come we can see billions of light years away?
(Christianity) Why weren't Jesus's miracles recorded by the romans?
(Islam) if Jesus was just a prophet, why is there a religion centered around him?
Evolutionists:
What caused the big bang?
I understand how bacteria evolved into complex life but how did life really begin?
If aliens are out there, why haven't we found them yet (fermi paradox)?
How did complex life survive before they evolved an immune system?
How does a mars like planet (the one which crashed into earth to form the moon) form in earth's orbit without crashing into the earth?
This is not an attack on any belief, this is just something to think about.
I believe that creationists are right about a higher power creating the universe, the reason being because we still don't have a 100% flawless theory on the reasons for the cause of the big bang,
Most people point out the problems in other people's beliefs while accepting theirs as the truth. However, there are many unsolved questions which poke holes in many beliefs:
Creationists:
How did life get to Australia if there was a worldwide flood?
If the universe is only thousands of years old, how come we can see billions of light years away?
(Christianity) Why weren't Jesus's miracles recorded by the romans?
(Islam) if Jesus was just a prophet, why is there a religion centered around him?
Evolutionists:
What caused the big bang?
I understand how bacteria evolved into complex life but how did life really begin?
If aliens are out there, why haven't we found them yet (fermi paradox)?
How did complex life survive before they evolved an immune system?
How does a mars like planet (the one which crashed into earth to form the moon) form in earth's orbit without crashing into the earth?
This is not an attack on any belief, this is just something to think about.
4.) I think a lot died and that is what developed the immune system. The thing is with this planet is it can't totally eliminate life, otherwise the Earth would die. So natural processes would be put in place, naturally, to provide conditions for life to survive long enough to create an immune system (Gaia Theory).
5.) So I tend to believe in a God, for theories like these. There are others of course. But in order for the Moon to collide with The Earth, then split off and have the exact mass to stay in orbit where it is, is extremely extremely unlikely. I forget the number. The "moon" rammed at such an angle and velocity to create the masses that were created and have it rest at that distance. Chance right? I mean, the universe is vastly huge, of course something like this was bound to happen. However, it could be argued that life could of existed without the moon, but not like life here on Earth. Gaia adapted to the Moon, and the processes were changed accordingly.
i think what you think is ignorance is actually quite logical, because by "100% flawless theory" i mean that we have a good theory, it just hasn't been proven to what science would call it a scientific law
My take on this question is a mix of both creationist and evolutionist. I believe that creationists are right about a higher power creating the universe, the reason being because we still don't have a 100% flawless theory on the reasons for the cause of the big bang, this leads me to believe that the higher power caused the Big Bang. However, after that evolutionists have the right idea. I believe the higher power didn't want to directly influence so early on its creation, so he let evolution take its course, thus leading in the creation of man through evolution. When man comes to be, that is when the higher power comes back to influence the world and gives the first human to evolve a name, Adam and he makes it so that the next human to evolve is a female and names her Eve. Adam is given the task by the higher power to name the creatures. and the rest is self explanatory. This is my take on your question.
There are no 'scientific laws' which cannot be broken. A scientific law being a statement that cannot be broken, this means that there exist no scientific laws. If you seek total and unquestionable truth, and attempt to placate the lack of the aforementioned with a 'god of the gaps', then you fail to grasp simple logical and scientific concepts
There are four scientific laws that can't be broken.
And what are they? Thermodynamics? Newtonian mechanics? Please enlighten me.
I edited my post with a link. Basically, gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak interaction which happen at an atomic level.
And there's others. The laws of thermodynamics, yes.
Wrong. At a singularity, all 'laws' of physics break down. Also, the four fundamental forces were not always separate. For example, the electromagnetic and weak interactions formed the electroweak interaction. A law has to be consistent across all spatial and time boundaries. Therefore, there are no 'scientific laws', only theories and hypotheses.
And what are they? Thermodynamics? Newtonian mechanics? Please enlighten me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?