- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 31,926
- Reaction score
- 29,390
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I'd say that depends on two things: 1) How transparent is the organization, and 2) Do the people you're beholden to demand a high level of ethical behavior?
If the answers are "Very much" and "Yes," then you could feasibly have an institution that's free of corruption.
Not even an organization run by God Almighty, and you're asking about humans?
Bu then wee have the definition of 'corruption' to deal with. It comes in many forms. If I take a bag of coffee from the company stash home one night....
Or the boss uses his expense account to buy diner for his mistress.
In a church I was with. The receptionist had been on the job too many years and had burned out years before. She was incompetent because of it and blocked anything new as she feared it would be additional work and she hated her job, although claimed the opposite.
As a result nothing got done. What was supposed to happening was poorly co-ordinated it became too frustrating and people would abandon the project.
We could not discuss firing her. She had been there too long and needed the income. To me it was charity, with the additional cost of her interfering with everything as she was also a control freak.
That cost the church and its members far more than her salary and went on for over 25 years!
Truth? That's every church in North America, every volunteer company, every small club and even some big ones. And if you think that is not a factor in the halls of power...think again.
Just like it is absolutely impossible for any human journalist to be bias free in their reporting.not as long as they are human
Then the best we can do is compensate for the expected bias, and limit the expected corruption by regulation and prosecution of it.Just like it is absolutely impossible for any human journalist to be bias free in their reporting.
Before I comment, what was your role in this story?Bu then wee have the definition of 'corruption' to deal with. It comes in many forms. If I take a bag of coffee from the company stash home one night....
Or the boss uses his expense account to buy diner for his mistress.
In a church I was with. The receptionist had been on the job too many years and had burned out years before. She was incompetent because of it and blocked anything new as she feared it would be additional work and she hated her job, although claimed the opposite.
As a result nothing got done. What was supposed to happening was poorly co-ordinated it became too frustrating and people would abandon the project.
We could not discuss firing her. She had been there too long and needed the income. To me it was charity, with the additional cost of her interfering with everything as she was also a control freak.
That cost the church and its members far more than her salary and went on for over 25 years!
Truth? That's every church in North America, every volunteer company, every small club and even some big ones. And if you think that is not a factor in the halls of power...think again.
According to Petroleum and coal products manufacturing are the most heavily regulated organization in the US. Pharmaceutical and medical manufacturing are in the top 10. Corrupt people don't follow regulations.Then the best we can do is compensate for the expected bias, and limit the expected corruption by regulation and prosecution of it.
Before I comment, what was your role in this story?
I was a member of the church and on council, head of the finance committee.
Q.F.T.!
I've never seen more incompetence, political ass-kissing, and pettiness, than at religious & small non-profit service orgs!
The small ones can be absolutely terrible to deal with, literally terrible. Petty! Petty! Petty! Yes, "petty" seems to the overarching dominate quality, with "incompetence" not far behind! Be prepared to walk on eggshells when around the unbelievably easily bruised egos often found at these places!
The big ones can be a little better. But the small ones? Forget about it!
That is why we have to enforce them, and do so in such a way that it's less profitable to break them than follow them.According to Petroleum and coal products manufacturing are the most heavily regulated organization in the US. Pharmaceutical and medical manufacturing are in the top 10. Corrupt people don't follow regulations.
Giving people time to cool off from an argument/debate and reconsider their arguments seems like a good thing if it gets too heated.Alcoholics anonymous is the most childish organization in the universe. I was back room service for 15 years and petty? **** we could get into a five hour fight over one word!
But it was all forgotten the next meeting. As childish and messed up it wall was, it worked! No one ever punched anyone and no one ever drank!
In any associative meeting, that's success!
AA has no rules, we have 'traditions'. And when we fight, we fight to win at all cost!
But we have traditions and one of them is when the debate gets too hot as per the chairman's call, the matter is put on hold for one week or a month.
In 15 years of service I never once saw an issue carry over.
In ten years service to the church, I seldom, if ever, saw issues resolved.
Childish? I disagree. Maybe Canada is different, but the tradition you posted isn't one of the 12 traditions here in the US. The meetings I attend there is no cross talk allowed, so there are no arguments. And as successful as AA is, people do relapse. I'm a founding member of our home group, and I wish " nobody ever drank". I haven't drank in 30 years, but wasn't a first nighter. The 12 steps and 12 traditions of AA are our foundation, none of which are "childish". JMHOAlcoholics anonymous is the most childish organization in the universe. I was back room service for 15 years and petty? **** we could get into a five hour fight over one word!
But it was all forgotten the next meeting. As childish and messed up it wall was, it worked! No one ever punched anyone and no one ever drank!
In any associative meeting, that's success!
AA has no rules, we have 'traditions'. And when we fight, we fight to win at all cost!
But we have traditions and one of them is when the debate gets too hot as per the chairman's call, the matter is put on hold for one week or a month.
In 15 years of service I never once saw an issue carry over.
In ten years service to the church, I seldom, if ever, saw issues resolved.
As it has always been. Yes.Then the best we can do is compensate for the expected bias, and limit the expected corruption by regulation and prosecution of it.
Childish? I disagree. Maybe Canada is different, but the tradition you posted isn't one of the 12 traditions here in the US. The meetings I attend there is no cross talk allowed, so there are no arguments. And as successful as AA is, people do relapse. I'm a founding member of our home group, and I wish " nobody ever drank". I haven't drank in 30 years, but wasn't a first nighter. The 12 steps and 12 traditions of AA are our foundation, none of which are "childish". JMHO
Giving people time to cool off from an argument/debate and reconsider their arguments seems like a good thing if it gets too heated.
Having those debates at all is also a good thing, and I suspect that churches tend to be more hierarchical when deciding
Not all, but definitely some.
auf WiedersehenSeig Heil
I opine that the first part of your post answers the question.Humanity's flaws aside for just a moment, how is everyone determining that all human organizations are corrupt?
I would say that some organizations are corrupt, some organizations are not but have corrupt members and some corrupt organizations can have non corrupt membersHumanity's flaws aside for just a moment, how is everyone determining that all human organizations are corrupt?
Can a human organization be free of corruption?
I would say that some organizations are corrupt, some organizations are not but have corrupt members and some corrupt organizations can have non corrupt members
Then there are some that are not corrupt and do not have corrupt members.
Its all fluid though as organizations can change as well as the people who make up the organization.
Heck even individuals can become corrupt or less frequently cease to be
AgreedKinda what I was getting at.
Just about anyone can be subjected to the flaws of humanity and become corrupt (or greedy, or whatever else.) But it seemed the way the OP phrased things suggested a all or nothing when it comes to organizations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?