• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Buttigieg dodges questions while his press secretary refuses to be on camera in East Palestine

anatta

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
35,355
Reaction score
16,606
Location
daily dukkha
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
a bit long of a redact , but the length the 'press secretary' :rolleyes: is going to not answer a question on camera
(and isnt that what press secretaries do?) is extraordinary...then she gets frustrated..lol
In the video, Hernandez first approached the cabinet secretary and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor as he was speaking with locals. She asked, "Mayor Pete, why did it take you an entire two-and-a-half weeks to actually get here to respond to East Palestine? Will you apologize to the residents of this city for the slow response?"
Buttigieg completely ignored Hernandez and walked into a nearby building as his press secretary called out to the reporter, saying, "I’m his press person, I can help you."
Though as soon as Hernandez’s camera moved to film Arndt, the spokesperson declared,
"I don’t want to be on camera please," and held her hand up to block the image.
While still filming, Hernandez proceeded to ask why it took Buttigieg "almost three weeks to get here," to which the press person replied, "I’m sorry, I don’t wanna do this on camera."

A fellow journalist asked Arndt another question about Buttigieg’s "personal time" that he claimed he was taking just before the trip, though the press secretary still refused to answer on video. She said, "I’m happy to talk to you guys off camera.
Hernandez shot back, "Well if you’re the press secretary of the secretary of the Department of Transportation, don’t you think you should be able ask [sic] questions of the American public that you serve?"


More forcefully, the spokesperson said, "Absolutely, I would like to do it without the camera on." She added that the cameras
are "a little bit aggressive. That’s why." Hernandez then asked why that’s aggressive, after which Arndt went silent, looking visibly frustrated.

A man standing nearby broke up the exchange while responding to a local police officer asking what the commotion was. He claimed the spokesperson asked the journalists "several times" to "turn the cameras off and they will not do it." The officer then invited the spokesperson to step away, which she did after stonewalling on one more question.
 
Last edited:
did he hand out water or caps?
 
SNL should make a skit out of his dodging
 
Norfolk Southern is the problem NOT pete. .... was not his train
 
I’m sure Pete was taking her picture so he could send the hounds after her when the sun went down. He keeps them in his dungeon basement next to the child grooming equipment. All gay men have them. It’s common knowledge.
 
SNL should make a skit out of his dodging
Isn't that filmed in New York City? I'm pretty sure you can get arrested for hate speech if you make fun of gay liberals there.
 
Norfolk Southern is the problem NOT pete. .... was not his train
But he's in charge of railroads and has been for 2 years. Are you saying that he is in a high level cabinet job but doesn't have to be accountable or responsible? But I know where this will go....where it always goes.....criticize him and you are a homophobe. Democrats win again.
 
a bit long of a redact , but the length the 'press secretary' :rolleyes: is going to not answer a question on camera
(and isnt that what press secretaries do?) is extraordinary...then she gets frustrated..lol
In the video, Hernandez first approached the cabinet secretary and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor as he was speaking with locals. She asked, "Mayor Pete, why did it take you an entire two-and-a-half weeks to actually get here to respond to East Palestine? Will you apologize to the residents of this city for the slow response?"
Buttigieg completely ignored Hernandez and walked into a nearby building as his press secretary called out to the reporter, saying, "I’m his press person, I can help you."
Though as soon as Hernandez’s camera moved to film Arndt, the spokesperson declared,
"I don’t want to be on camera please," and held her hand up to block the image.
While still filming, Hernandez proceeded to ask why it took Buttigieg "almost three weeks to get here," to which the press person replied, "I’m sorry, I don’t wanna do this on camera."

A fellow journalist asked Arndt another question about Buttigieg’s "personal time" that he claimed he was taking just before the trip, though the press secretary still refused to answer on video. She said, "I’m happy to talk to you guys off camera.
Hernandez shot back, "Well if you’re the press secretary of the secretary of the Department of Transportation, don’t you think you should be able ask [sic] questions of the American public that you serve?"


More forcefully, the spokesperson said, "Absolutely, I would like to do it without the camera on." She added that the cameras
are "a little bit aggressive. That’s why." Hernandez then asked why that’s aggressive, after which Arndt went silent, looking visibly frustrated.

A man standing nearby broke up the exchange while responding to a local police officer asking what the commotion was. He claimed the spokesperson asked the journalists "several times" to "turn the cameras off and they will not do it." The officer then invited the spokesperson to step away, which she did after stonewalling on one more question.
When people are supposed to have answers but don't have a clue what they're doing they usually don't like to be bothered.
 
When people are supposed to have answers but don't have a clue what they're doing they usually don't like to be bothered.
^ Age old tactic Conservatives have been using for many decades. Most recently when Trump and some of partners in crime refused to testify before the 1/06/2020 Investigative Committee.
 
Actually, those^ are 'your' words. 'Not' @Razoo's words.
You must think Razoo is not very bright. From past threads I'm pretty confident Razoo knows that officials in high level Cabinet positions should be responsible and held accountable.
Of course it is a Biden appointee so most people don't expect much from them except diversity. Joe has done a bang up job in that area.
 
But he's in charge of railroads and has been for 2 years. Are you saying that he is in a high level cabinet job but doesn't have to be accountable or responsible? But I know where this will go....where it always goes.....criticize him and you are a homophobe. Democrats win again.
He is charge of enforcing the laws, duh

How about you hold the Railway Company responsible
 
Trump and some of partners in crime refused to testify before the 1/06/2020 Investigative Committee.
Oh good....the thread has evolved into old news that is irrelevant to the train derailment. Did you hear about that stain on Monica's dress? It was from Bill.
 
Oh good....the thread has evolved into old news that is irrelevant to the train derailment. Did you hear about that stain on Monica's dress? It was from Bill.
Why is Pete responsible??
 
Back
Top Bottom