I agree, I am still very disappointed that Bush didn't have the courage to PARDON these two men for doing their job. It is still an injustice that they now have a criminal record in my opinion.
Let me interpret this for the thread participants: “I didn't have any facts and jumped to wild eyed conclusions regarding this case because I would prefer we set murdering drug smugglers free and imprison those trying to protect our borders and American citizens. However, I also refuse to allow the facts to change my rabid partisan views about Bush.”
This, people, is what is wrong with Disney Dudes "chicken little" mentality and is the makeup of many other Bush haters in this country.
When you justify actions of men like this, you demean every one of our officers who discharge their duties according to the law.
Let me correct this statement: When you demean the actions of men like this, you demean the efforts of other officers who discharge their duties according to the law.
The notion that these men violated our laws during their encounter with this thug who was indeed violating them is laughable; at best they broke the law trying to cover up what had occurred, now that would be what is wrong. They had nothing to hide except for the knowledge that the American media and Liberals would be calling for the heads of anyone who dared shoot a thug while trying to escape doing their duty.
Maybe you would too if you actually looked at the physical evidence that basically refuted the agents story.
Says the man who thought they killed the person, that he was somehow proven to be unarmed, and that they tried to "cover up the killing"
How about this...
Go actually research what the **** you're talking about then come back and try to comment on people not knowing about the evidence.
Your initial post was filled with so many inaccurate statements that it is absolutely laughable you're telling anyone that they should look at the evidence. What evidence exactly did you research and learn so well that caused you to think the man was killed.
You're entire premise here is a joke because it was based off obviously idiotic, slanted, partisan hack propaganda put out by extremists on the left mad that a poor poor mexican just got put down by "The Man" of the U.S. again.
Bush commutes sentences of former US border agents - Yahoo! News
Typical of his Presidency....Bush commutes the sentences of the border patrol agents who shot the man in the back.
Granted ... this man was a suspected drug dealer, nevertheless, he was unarmed and shot in the back and killed. Even worse, they lied and tried to cover up the killing.
Bush commutes sentences of former US border agents - Yahoo! News
Typical of his Presidency....Bush commutes the sentences of the border patrol agents who shot the man in the back.
Granted ... this man was a suspected drug dealer, nevertheless, he was unarmed and shot in the back and killed. Even worse, they lied and tried to cover up the killing.
Honestly....why do you believe they deserved pardons?
They shot an unarmed man in the back, lied about it and then tried to cover it up by trying to get rid of the spent shell casing evidence.
I'm curious as to why you believe they deserved to be pardoned.
Because they were chasing down an illegal alien who was also a known drug dealer? I dunno...seems like good enough reason to give them a pass to me.
Although, I do find something confusing. If governors and presidents are in the executive branches of state and federal government, respectively, how do they have the power to overturn or nullify judicial mandates?
Bush commutes sentences of former US border agents - Yahoo! News
Typical of his Presidency....Bush commutes the sentences of the border patrol agents who shot the man in the back.
Granted ... this man was a suspected drug dealer, nevertheless, he was unarmed and shot in the back and killed. Even worse, they lied and tried to cover up the killing.
Says the man who thought they killed the person, that he was somehow proven to be unarmed, and that they tried to "cover up the killing"
How about this...
Go actually research what the **** you're talking about then come back and try to comment on people not knowing about the evidence.
Your initial post was filled with so many inaccurate statements that it is absolutely laughable you're telling anyone that they should look at the evidence. What evidence exactly did you research and learn so well that caused you to think the man was killed.
You're entire premise here is a joke because it was based off obviously idiotic, slanted, partisan hack propaganda put out by extremists on the left mad that a poor poor mexican just got put down by "The Man" of the U.S. again.
Got it wrong again, what a shock :shock::lol: at you defending a criminal savage illegal alien scum
That's a lot more civilized than wanting the pot dealer killed....the truth is that the pot dealer is a criminal and so are the ex-border agents...and they all deserve to be in jail.Meh you want to see to law enforcment agents suffer for 10 years each for shooting the asshole in the ass.
That's a lot more civilized than wanting the pot dealer killed....the truth is that the pot dealer is a criminal and so are the ex-border agents...and they all deserve to be in jail.
Bush commutes sentences of former US border agents - Yahoo! News
Typical of his Presidency....Bush commutes the sentences of the border patrol agents who shot the man in the back.
Granted ... this man was a suspected drug dealer, nevertheless, he was unarmed and shot in the back and killed. Even worse, they lied and tried to cover up the killing.
No, he was a KNOWN drug dealer and he was shot in the ass... because he was trying to evade the border patrol and his impending arrest.
Get your facts straight.
:mrgreen:
Shot in the ass....shot in the back....same diff......the bottom line is, the man's back was to them and yet they claimed "self defense".
Yes, because as we ALL know its physically impossible to turn while you're running and shoot. Absolutely impossible.
Oh wait, its absolutely proven according to your wondrous source that ALSO apparently said that they killed the guy that he didn't have a gun and that the agents were lying. :roll:
Not only was he a drug smuggler he was an invader. All invaders of our nation should be shot on sight. Where I live in Texas you can be shot for being on someones private property. But are BP agents can't shoot invaders crossing our borders illegally. What the hell is wrong with our country's values.
Ramos and Compean are heros as far as I am concerned. They shot a low life piece of ****. The only thing they did wrong is they didn't kill the SOB.
I agree, I am still very disappointed that Bush didn't have the courage to PARDON these two men for doing their job. It is still an injustice that they now have a criminal record in my opinion.
My personal belief is that the dealer was here illegally. (1st law broken)
and he was involved with drugs (2nd law broken)
His injuries would not have occured had he not broken the law in the first place.
As such the officer shouldn't be held accountable.
Didn't your mother ever teach you...."Two wrongs don't make a right".
By your rationale, the police don't have to follow their job description nor the laws of this land as long as they are pursuing another person who broke the law.
Didn't your mother ever teach you...."Two wrongs don't make a right".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?