Reports: Bush Authorized NSA to Spy in U.S. 9 minutes ago
NEW YORK - The National Security Agency has eavesdropped, without warrants, on as many 500 people inside the United States at any given time since 2002, The New York Times reported Friday.
That year, following the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush authorized the NSA to monitor the international phone calls and international e-mails of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of people inside the United States, the Times reported.
Before the program began, the NSA typically limited its domestic surveillance to foreign embassies and missions and obtained court orders for such investigations. Overseas, 5,000 to 7,000 people suspected of terrorist ties are monitored at one time.
The Times said reporters interviewed nearly a dozen current and former administration officials about the program and granted them anonymity because of the classified nature of the program.
Government officials credited the new program with uncovering several terrorist plots, including one by Iyman Faris, an Ohio trucker who pleaded guilty in 2003 to supporting al-Qaida by planning to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge, the report said.
But some NSA officials were so concerned about the legality of the program that they refused to participate, the Times said. Questions about the legality of the program led the administration to temporarily suspend it last year and impose new restrictions.
Caroline Fredrickson, director of the Washington legislative office of the American Civil Liberties Union, said the group's initial reaction to the NSA disclosure was "shock that the administration has gone so far in violating American civil liberties to the extent where it seems to be a violation of federal law."
Asked about the administration's contention that the eavesdropping has disrupted terrorist attacks, Fredrickson said the ACLU couldn't comment until it sees some evidence. "They've veiled these powers in secrecy so there's no way for Congress or any independent organizations to exercise any oversight."
TimmyBoy said:Here is why you don't ever trust the government or politicans and why you want to limit the scope and size of government. Allow the government to become to large and they will try to destroy freedom:
Secrecy is a means of preventing accountability, honesty and of allowing tyranny to develop:
The ends do not justify the means. In any other court situation a case would be thrown out because of improperly filed warrants.Stinger said:Seems the congress and the courts were fully aware. And in fact a terrorist act was prevented due to the survellience. So how do we monitor our enemies without violating the rights of citizens here? These were international calls some coming into the USA from outside.
TimmyBoy said:Here is why you don't ever trust the government or politicans and why you want to limit the scope and size of government. Allow the government to become to large and they will try to destroy freedom:
Secrecy is a means of preventing accountability, honesty and of allowing tyranny to develop:
http://www.pacifica.org/programs/dn/051215.htmlPentagon Caught Spying on U.S. Anti-War and Anti-Nuclear Activists
Newly leaked Pentagon documents have confirmed the military has been monitoring and collecting intelligence on anti-war groups across the country. Peace protests are being described as threats and the military is collecting data on who is attending demonstrations. We speak with William Arkin, the former Army intelligence officer, who obtained the secret Pentagon documents. [includes rush transcript]
Earlier this week NBC News exposed the existence of a secret Pentagon database to track intelligence gathered inside the United States. The database including information on dozens of anti-war protests and rallies particularly actions targeting military recruiting.
The list included: counter-military recruiting meetings held at a Quaker Meeting House in Lake Forth, Florida. Anti-nuclear protests staged in Nebraska on the 50th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of Nagasaki. An anti-war protest organized by military families outside Fort Bragg in North Carolina. And a rally in San Diego to support war resister Pablo Parades. The Pentagon database described all of these events as threats.
hipsterdufus said:You beat me to the punch posting this thread. Combine that with the recent FBI documents that show the government considers peace protests a threat to national security and its pretty clear that -
http://www.pacifica.org/programs/dn/051215.html
steen said:It is Gestapo all over again. Next, we will ask the kids to spy on their parents and report to the State if the parents are critical of the Government.
TimmyBoy said:George Orwell was a genius as well is Noam Chomsky. However, I do not share their socialist convictions. I believe in free market enterprise and good ole fashion American capitalism.
steen said:It is Gestapo all over again. Next, we will ask the kids to spy on their parents and report to the State if the parents are critical of the Government.
steen said:It is Gestapo all over again. Next, we will ask the kids to spy on their parents and report to the State if the parents are critical of the Government.
Hoot said:What kills me about all this is... Bush had a chance to gain a little more traction and approval...what with the elections in Iraq..etc, but now we have the Patriot Act going down to defeat, and all this stuff about Bush authorizing spying on Americans, and his flip-flop on the torture amendment,
The guy is certainly having a run of bad luck...most of it brought on by himself. Here's hoping 2006 is a better year for all Americans.
Did he own up to just the WMD intel being faulty or all of it being faulty?Pacridge said:I don't know. I see Bush picking up in the approval area. The elections in Iraq are a pretty big thing. Plus I think his owning up to the faulty Intel. thing has also helped him in many circles. I certainly respect that much more then continuing the lies of "there were weapons, we found weapons etc..."
YNKYH8R said:The ends do not justify the means. In any other court situation a case would be thrown out because of improperly filed warrants.
tryreading said:This administration has made too many very poor decisions. I can't find anything redeeming in it anymore. Buying the media, irresponsibly attacking Iraq, torturing, endangering our civil rights... Can we take three more years of this mess?
The Orange/Osceola (here in Florida) county attorney general had an idea last year - he wanted to utilize vendors and service people to check out people's homes while in them doing service on plumbing, A/C, etc. He thought terrorists could be discovered if these folks looked for signs like several men living together (especially of Arabic appearance). He wanted to have us spy on each other. He actually suggested this plan. There was such an uproar that he realized what an idiot he had been to seriously consider this and he shut his ignorant, UnAmerican mouth.
People who are for the 'Patriot' act should understand it is clowns like this public servant who formulate these ideas. They can not be trusted.
I would like to see Congress investigate the President's NSA tactic. I would also like any politician who approved listening to my private phone conversations imprisoned.
scottyz said:Did he own up to just the WMD intel being faulty or all of it being faulty?
Stinger said:And:
The Bush administration had briefed congressional leaders about the program and notified the judge in charge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the secret Washington court that handles national security issues.
Aides to National Intelligence Director John Negroponte and West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, declined to comment Thursday night.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/15/231957.shtml
Seems the congress and the courts were fully aware. And in fact a terrorist act was prevented due to the survellience. So how do we monitor our enemies without violating the rights of citizens here? These were international calls some coming into the USA from outside.
If he tells us, the terrorists win. :shock:tryreading said:What was prevented? The President said 'possible' terrorist acts were prevented:
The president contended the program has helped "detect and prevent possible terrorist attacks in the U.S. and abroad," but did not provide specific examples.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?