- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
When the Ferguson police department released the name of Darren Wilson, they also chose to release video footage which they claimed was of Michael Brown robbing a convenience store for some cigars.
The problem is, the video shows Michael Brown at the register, paying for the cigars.
. Something doesn't add up here.
The title of the article is a bit misleading, but this is interesting.
– Ferguson Police Busted – Attempt To Defame Shooting Victim Blows Up In Their Face (VIDEO)
They never called to report a theft according to their attorney either.
It just seems odd that there'd be a theft that according to the market wasn't a theft. Something doesn't add up here.
Ok, someone is lying here. Page four of the police report states that the owners are willing to press charges, so obviously either a.) something was stolen or b.) the cops are outright lying on their reports.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2014/images/08/15/ferguson-police-report.pdf
You need to follow up you sources better, using your article made me look like a fool on another forum.
So far, I have come up with 2 identical postings from you on this.
The title of the article is a bit misleading, but this is interesting.
– Ferguson Police Busted – Attempt To Defame Shooting Victim Blows Up In Their Face (VIDEO)
They never called to report a theft according to their attorney either.
It just seems odd that there'd be a theft that according to the market wasn't a theft. Something doesn't add up here.
In any case, the investigation should be done by feds and not locals.
The title of the article is a bit misleading, but this is interesting.
– Ferguson Police Busted – Attempt To Defame Shooting Victim Blows Up In Their Face (VIDEO)
They never called to report a theft according to their attorney either.
It just seems odd that there'd be a theft that according to the market wasn't a theft. Something doesn't add up here.
Why? It's local jurisdiction.
So that the probability of a conflict of interest is visibly reduced. We obviously have a situation of civil unrest and failing public order so there are good reasons.
Legitimacy is extremely important and leaving this to a local judge and a police force that is a party to the problems would be careless of the responsibility to the people, foster distrust an provoke further unrest.
I do recall you calling yourself antisemitic and then blaming me for it. Is that what you are talking about?Somehow it got duplicated. Sorry, Mr. Perfect.
Isn't there a thread for you to go calling everybody anti-semitic in here somewhere?
And, the shark has been officially jumped. Hilarious. Yeah, every time I pay for something at a corner store I always take a moment and rough up the clerk a bit before I go. Just makes the day complete. :lamo:lamo:lamo
There's already way too much encroachment of the federal gov't. It's local jurisdiction and the same person that has been re-elected since the 90's should be the one and trusted enough to do so. Obviously locals know the area and with Holder's record of corruption how would that make it more legit.
I do recall you calling yourself antisemitic and then blaming me for it. Is that what you are talking about?
What that has to do with your silly thread here, though, is anybody's guess.
Right, you never do that. Except all the time.
I agree. The federal government has too much to do and gets involved in too many things, perhaps. But that does not mean i would trust the local police, politicians nor the judges in a case like this. And I have no immediate skin in this. I am White and all those things. But they are too inbred.
So if I don't trust them then there are tens of millions of minority members that will believe they are being cheated. Legitimacy will be lost and the injustice of the system will seem proven.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?