- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
- Messages
- 28,134
- Reaction score
- 15,023
- Location
- Canada's Capital
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Saying " The likelihood of vote fraud occurring is on the order of winning the lottery,” is based on?
So your claim is that Republicans committed voter fraud and it's clear that Democrats committed voter fraud so what is the problem then with voter ID? It seems essential.
DEMOCRATS Arrested and/or Convicted of Voter Fraud | UnPoliticallyCorrect's Blog
It's based-on cold hard facts. Sorry if it does not cater to your pre-conceived notion.
wow dude you mean the only way a Republican has a chance is if there's a clean election?
well then the GOP really is doomed :lamo
Do you really need to have it explained to you? The Republican leader of the House in Pennsylvania said the real reason for voter-id. So the Republicans can win.
Talk about desperation. Your useless proves absolutely nothing.
Again, voter fraud is very rare. You can piss n moan, pout and cry all you want about it. But it will not change the fact that the new ID laws will curb practically nothing. Well, apart from stopping some Americans citizens for not being able to practice their constitutional right.
The Republicans don't want a clean election. They want to reduce the number of votes Democrats get.
It's very simple -- both parties are going off of what I believe to be the faulty assumption that the Democrats benefit under the current system. If they thought it was the Republicans that benefitted, the parties would have the opposite positions to what they currently have.
Sorry Grant, that's not true.And the Democrats want the voter to vote repeatedly so their party might win. That's not news.
Of course, one person, one vote. You don't think women vote?Which system do you think is fairer? One man - one vote, or one man - several votes?
Sorry Grant, that's not true. Edit: Please explain how the Democrats could accomplish this?
Of course, one person, one vote. You don't think women vote?
By having one voter vote several times, just as is reflected in its history, and the charges and convictions which have sometimes followed. The Republicans, as the video showed, feel they can win a fair election, but the Democrats aren't comfortable with that idea.
Again, that's impossible once the spot on the voter roll is signed by a voter it can't be signed again. Haven't you ever voted? LMMFAO
And how would they do that?
It should not even be a partisan issue. It should be a 'what's best for the country and democracy' issue.
Why not fix cracks in the system?
Again its impossible to go to the poll and vote more than once. These convictions are because they used absentee ballots. It's impossible to get away with this.Here's a Google page. Click any one of them. https://www.google.co.cr/search?q=d...lla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&gws_rd=cr
Again its impossible to go to the poll and vote more than once. These convictions are because they used absentee ballots. It's impossible to get away with this.
HAVE YOU EVER VOTED AT A POLLING PLACE, GRANT?
It's impossible to vote more than once at a specific polling place. If you have ever voted at polling place you surely would know this. lolHow many of those did you read??? There were even people working at the polling stations arrested!! It is not just about absentee ballots!
It's impossible to vote more than once at a specific polling place. If you have ever voted at polling place you surely would know this. lol
Give one example where someone voted more than once at same polling place.And if you read the conviction lists you would know otherwise. You believe whatever you want, This is just not interesting.
Voter impersonation is actually the only kind of fraud that requiring IDs would do anything about. That is a small number.
Requiring ID would do nothing about the widespread electoral fraud that both parties engage in on a regular basis. When you think about it, obviously the Republicans would do nothing about that. The whole "ID to fix fraud" is a red herring. It's made to make you think they're doing something to have fair elections, but it really does nothing.
Go ahead and have voter ID in all 50 states. It won't have the impact you think it will. I'd prefer that our legislatures put their efforts into finding real solutions to real problems. If the GOP put half as much effort into fixing electoral fraud as they put into making their sheeple think they are doing something, it would be a thing of the past. But they're not interested in doing that because that would restrict their shenanigans.
Why doesn't the Democrat party propose a solution to fraudulent machine programs and other vote abuses? I'm independent. I don't trust or like EITHER major party.
But before you throw rocks, make sure YOUR party is CLEAN and DOING something!
I'm independent also. The difference, to me, is that the Democrats don't go around saying that we need to fix the system. So they're not proposing a solution because they don't think there's a problem.
I think there's a problem, but it's not going to be solved with ID.
if the democrats think those non-voters are or would be conservative.
And if the Republicans think that too, and think that requiring ID would prod them to vote....well no wonder they'd want it!
isn't elections about what the majority of "THE PEOPLE' want?
or just the barely half who vote?
or is it about getting YOUR party in power by hook or crook?
Anyway, all this discussion is mute!
IDs are here to stay, and I expect MORE states to adopt them.
Maybe as many as 48, Cal and Mass being holdouts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?