- Joined
- Jul 22, 2025
- Messages
- 233
- Reaction score
- 143
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
This goes to show how dirty Obama and Brennan were.
This is all bullshit.This goes to show how dirty Obama and Brennan were. Brennan ignored his CIA analysts team who concluded there was no solid evidence Putin favored Trump to be president. They both committed Seditious Conspiracy.
How Obama Admin Turned ‘Unverifiable’ Report Into Russiagate Dynamite
The Obama intelligence community’s claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized dirty tricks to try and help Donald Trump win the 2016 election was based onwww.realclearinvestigations.com
Your obsession with Obama is almost erotic, sensual even. You want to tell us more about how dirty you think he was?
The guy is history at this point.
He can't run again and is only slightly involved these days as he's happy not being constantly in the spotlight.
They need to move on already.
The professional CIA analysts couldn't find solid evidence Putin favored Trump to be president. These analysts have now turned into whistleblowers.This is all bullshit.
Nonsensical bullshit.The professional CIA analysts couldn't find solid evidence Putin favored Trump to be president. These analysts have now turned into whistleblowers.
More nonsensical bullshit.When Putin was reading all the lies from Obama he was laughing because he had spies in the USA and the USA had nothing on him.
Your projection suggests it's the other way around. It's actually you who's erotically obsessed with Obama, whom Biden described as "Clean and Articulate" for his type kind of people.Your obsession with Obama is almost erotic, sensual even.
I think it's romantic.
Your projection suggests it's the other way around. It's actually you who's erotically obsessed with Obama, whom Biden described as "Clean and Articulate" for his type kind of people.
This goes to show how dirty Obama and Brennan were. Brennan ignored his CIA analysts team who concluded there was no solid evidence Putin favored Trump to be president. They both committed Seditious Conspiracy.
How Obama Admin Turned ‘Unverifiable’ Report Into Russiagate Dynamite
The Obama intelligence community’s claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized dirty tricks to try and help Donald Trump win the 2016 election was based onwww.realclearinvestigations.com
Your projection suggests it's the other way around. It's actually you who's erotically obsessed with Obama, whom Biden described as "Clean and Articulate" for his type kind of people.
The Moscow informant was instrumental to the C.I.A.’s most explosive conclusion about Russia’s interference campaign: that President Vladimir V. Putin ordered and orchestrated it himself. As the American government’s best insight into the thinking of and orders from Mr. Putin, the source was also key to the C.I.A.’s assessment that he affirmatively favored Donald J. Trump’s election and personally ordered the hacking of the Democratic National Committee.
Paul Sperry is an accomplished highly respected investigative journalist. He has many sources in the intelligence community and on Capitol Hill.Nonsensical bullshit.
If that were the case, the Russians would not have interfered in the election.
Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016
https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the...resources/key-findings-of-the-mueller-report/
- Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1]
- Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3]
- Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]\
The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”
- In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
- Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
- Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
- The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
- The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
- The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]
Right-wing X posters are not evidence. Stop spewing lies.
Nope.Paul Sperry is an accomplished highly respected investigative journalist. He has many sources in the intelligence community and on Capitol Hill.
I'll believe that when it's proven by others beyond a reasonable doubt, not just one conservative poster on a social media site (Sperry).This goes to show how dirty Obama and Brennan were. Brennan ignored his CIA analysts team who concluded there was no solid evidence Putin favored Trump to be president. They both committed Seditious Conspiracy.
How Obama Admin Turned ‘Unverifiable’ Report Into Russiagate Dynamite
The Obama intelligence community’s claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized dirty tricks to try and help Donald Trump win the 2016 election was based onwww.realclearinvestigations.com
But he is their reason for existing as a racist political power. I witnessed it with my own eyes, the boiling racist rage over having to endure eight years of a black president! The confederacy is alive and well (and in power) in the former U.S.A.The guy is history at this point.
He can't run again and is only slightly involved these days as he's happy not being constantly in the spotlight.
They need to move on already.
Most likely that was the CIA's cover story to give some credibility to their 'findings'. I don't think the spy ever existed. Even if he's safely back in America hiding out its not our policy not good spy-craft to shout all this out to the media.This is just not true or if it's true, it's because Brennan was using intel those other agents didn't have access to.
There was an asset that the CIA had at top levels of the Putin regime. The guy was recruited and over the years climbed the ranks. He was able to provide very detailed information on what Putin was saying in insider meetings and what Putin was thinking.
C.I.A. Informant Extracted From Russia Had Sent Secrets to U.S. for Decades (Published 2019)
American intelligence officials had previously tried to extract the source from Russia in 2016, but the informant had initially refused.www.nytimes.com
I know it wont even cause MAGA to even stop and ask "man, how would Gabbard not know this?". You'll just move on to the next lie they throw out there.
Gabbard is, was, and will always be a Russian asset.This is just not true or if it's true, it's because Brennan was using intel those other agents didn't have access to.
There was an asset that the CIA had at top levels of the Putin regime. The guy was recruited and over the years climbed the ranks. He was able to provide very detailed information on what Putin was saying in insider meetings and what Putin was thinking.
C.I.A. Informant Extracted From Russia Had Sent Secrets to U.S. for Decades (Published 2019)
American intelligence officials had previously tried to extract the source from Russia in 2016, but the informant had initially refused.www.nytimes.com
I know it wont even cause MAGA to even stop and ask "man, how would Gabbard not know this?". You'll just move on to the next lie they throw out there.
But he is their reason for existing as a racist political power. I witnessed it with my own eyes, the boiling racist rage over having to endure eight years of a black president! The confederacy is alive and well (and in power) in the former U.S.A.
Trump was seen in pictures with Epstein at wealthy social functions. That's not a crime. Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago as soon as he heard about him with young girls. On the other hand, Clinton continued to hang out with Epstein many times more than Trump plus 100s of others. Ghislaine even attended Chelsea's wedding.I mean, the guy hung out with child rapist Epstein for a decade or more?
That is a lie.Trump was seen in pictures with Epstein at wealthy social functions. That's not a crime. Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago as soon as he heard about him with young girls. On the other hand, Clinton continued to hang out with Epstein many times more than Trump plus 100s of others. Ghislaine even attended Chelsea's wedding.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?